Bob Janova Posted February 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 (edited) Londo basically stated the system. The other way you can get a high tension is if you are too close to another alliance, if you're being pulled towards it by other treaties as well. I don't know which of those is true. I might make those display as negative tensions. E: Yep, updated the web program and you are being pulled 'too close' to NPO by either other treaties or by alliances further 'out' in the web pushing you against them. Updating the OP with a new list that marks negative tension. Edited February 4, 2009 by Bob Janova Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RulertheWhite Posted February 4, 2009 Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 Hey there. This is very cool, but I would like to point out, the CCC is no single color. We are a mixed color alliance. Good job on this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slayer99 Posted February 4, 2009 Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 Londo basically stated the system.The other way you can get a high tension is if you are too close to another alliance, if you're being pulled towards it by other treaties as well. I don't know which of those is true. I might make those display as negative tensions. Positive or negative tensions might explain things a little better. Nice work Bob... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeta Defender Posted February 4, 2009 Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 Out of curiosity, what is the current record for the shortest CN Protectorate Treaty to exist (Time Wise Not Document Word Count)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 Hey there. This is very cool, but I would like to point out, the CCC is no single color. We are a mixed color alliance.Good job on this! I know, but your circle has to be drawn in some colour . I picked the one that seemed to represent most of your top 20 nations, I think. (The same is true of MCXA and possibly some others.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RulertheWhite Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 (edited) Ah, I was confused, I thought it was a list of the alliances actual color Edited February 5, 2009 by RulerII Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 Bob, I thought about pointing out your strange comment about whinging, but I haven't yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 If you read through page 1 and the number of people who took the time to complain here when they could have instead updated the list, you will understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2009 Treaties updated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted February 10, 2009 Report Share Posted February 10, 2009 some missing genesis treaties: ODP -Vanguard -Old Guard ToA -Mushroom Kingdom PIAT -Invicta -Mostly Harmless Alliance -LEN -Echelon or at least thats what it says on our forums. our wiki is very out of date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted February 10, 2009 Report Share Posted February 10, 2009 If you read through page 1 and the number of people who took the time to complain here when they could have instead updated the list, you will understand I think you missed my point about whinging. If you see something missing, don't whinge, add it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2009 I'm still missing it . Maicke: In the time it took you to post that, you could have updated the master list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I'm still missing it .Maicke: In the time it took you to post that, you could have updated the master list you mean the wiki list? cause otherwise i have no idea what list this is. . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 Never mind. I just learned a new word today. I swear, I've never heard it before. And I'm old... in a sense. Carry on. And yeah, maicke, he means the wiki list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElCid Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 I definitely appreciate you making this thread! It always helps when I have to look up such things. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venizelos Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 (edited) International-RIA MDP: MDP with RIA; total NS 6.6M, tension 207 (64 per M NS) it is INT-RIA MDoAP. Edited February 11, 2009 by Venizelos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 Nicely done, even if tension doesn't take enough into consideration to be an accurate measure, it is an interesting stat to get some perspective on the strain of so many alliances having treaties all over the place, with high tension treaties being more likely to force an alliance to choose between allies if a conflict were to arise pulling allies in various directions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 Updated with today's NS and treaty information. Thanks to people who added treaties to the wiki page! However, if you do so please make sure you use tabs and not spaces between the columns, otherwise the web program can't read the row properly and your alliance/treaty will disappear unless I notice and fix it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 okay, i want to update the wiki, but im a little confused (im new to this ) i dont see a genesis section at all on the list. so do i have to put in the genesis part in the order of the strength of alliances? or can i just put it at the end? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 There is a Genesis section, it contains one treaty (your alliance with Polaris). If you wish to add treaties with alliances that are stronger than yours, put them there. If you wish to add treaties with alliances weaker than your own, enter them under the weaker alliance. (If they're outside the top 80 you might have to add them to the NS list and the alliance list too, if you want the treaty to be included on here.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maicke Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 ah, i see. it was so small i missed it updating now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ejayrazz Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 Good work mate. Nicely created. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted February 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Full update. Congratulations to Argent for making it into the top 80 and onto the web! Please check that your treaties are correct. UBD fell out of the top 80 to make way for Argent. They, CCC and Nebula-X are no longer being maintained by me and will be cut from the web unless a member (or someone on their behalf) informs me that they are maintaining their treaties (or you make it back into the top 80). Ordo Verde and Western Empire are being maintained by their memberships. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 (edited) Argent-TOOL MDoAP: MDoAP with TOOL; total NS 8.9M, tension 73 (54 per M NS) Argent-ODN PIAT: PIAT with ODN; total NS 9.4M, tension 23 (17 per M NS) Argent-Invicta PIAT: PIAT with Invicta; total NS 4.9M, tension 21 (15 per M NS) Argent-UCN PIAT: PIAT with UCN; total NS 2.7M, tension 9 (6 per M NS) The above is correct, also below are the additions Argent-IRON PIAT/ODP Argent-Arrow Of Chiron PIAT (Not top 80 though) Argent-FOK MDoAP Edited February 18, 2009 by janax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacingOutMan Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Still missing LEN-CSN MDP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.