Mixoux Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Argh, TOOL is gonna catch us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Cao Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) Nukes per Member - 22/02/09 Changes this week: - Increased pool to include top 50 by score so as to cover much the same alliances as Kroknia. I will continue including anyone in top 20 by nukes or member count who does not also fall within the top 50 by score, but at present no alliance is in this situation anyway. - Initial value in main list is now score rank not NS rank, to fall in line with previous change. This will make very little difference and list is still sorted by nuke count. - Like Kroknia I will keep tracking anybody who has previously qualified but drops out for the main list, for a reasonable period of time. For the >10 list I will keep tracking anyone who falls short of 10 nukes/member unless they drop below 8. - Changed colour ranking back from quartiles to original absolute system, but altered brackets slightly, see below. Quartiles will still be reported but will not affect anything else. All Top-50 Alliances by Score* Alliances are sorted in descending order by nuke count, the initial value is their Score rank to use as comparison. Bold value is nukes/member ratio. Value in brackets is change from last week; any change of less than 0.05 is not shown. Red: >15 nukes/member Orange: 7.5 - 15 nukes/member Blue: 4 - 7.5 nukes/member Green: 2 - 4 nukes/member 2) Independent Republic Of Orange Nations - 4.5 (+0.2) 1) New Pacific Order - 3.5 6) The Order Of The Paradox - 16.6 (+0.2) 11) The Grämlins - 18.8 (+0.1) 3) Multicolored Cross-X Alliance - 2.4 15) FOK - 5.3 (-1.0) 14) The Phoenix Federation - 6.1 (+0.3) 5) Mostly Harmless Alliance - 2.7 (+0.1) 4) Sparta - 2.5 (+0.1) 7) Fark - 4.3 (+0.2) 10) New Polar Order - 3.6 (+0.6) 35) Umbrella - 16.9 (-0.5) 19) Valhalla - 8.7 (+0.1) 13) Viridian Entente - 3.4 41) Poison Clan - 16.9 (+0.7) 9) Ragnarok - 2.4 (+0.1) 42) Global Order Of Darkness - 10.3 (+0.2) 12) The Order Of Light - 2.8 (+0.2) 46) The Order Of Righteous Nations - 10.8 25) Echelon - 6.6 - (+0.3) 8) Orange Defense Network - 1.4 23) Greenland Republic - 3.6 32) RnR - 4.3 48) Vanguard - 9.9 (-1.2) 29) Loss - 3.8 47) Nusantara Elite Warriors - 5.3 34) Random Insanity Alliance - 3.6 30) World Task Force - 4.7 17) The Democratic Order - 1.0 31) M*A*S*H - 3.5 27) Nueva Vida - 2.7 20) The Dark Evolution - 1.7 (+0.1) 28) Monos Archein - 1.9 (+0.1) 37) The International - 2.7 21) Global Democratic Alliance - 1.6 (+0.1) 18) Grand Global Alliance - 1.3 (+0.2) 79) Argent - 8.0 26) The Legion - 1.3 50) Fellowship Of Elite Allied Republics - 4.1 22) United Purple Nations - 1.5 (+0.1) 45) The Centurion Brotherhood - 2.2 40) The Templar Knights - 2.6 38) NATO - 1.7 43) The Foreign Division - 2.3 39) Commonwealth Of Sovereign Nations - 2.2 36) Invicta - 1.6 33) North Atlantic Defense Coalition - 1.6 24) Mushroom Kingdom - 1.8 49) We Are Perth Army - 1.1 44) Ubercon - 1.4 16) Green Protection Agency - 0.2 (+0.1) Quartiles: Q1 = 1.74, Q2 = 2.74, Q3 = 4.67 Mean: 4.56 * Any alliances not in top 50 by score but in top 20 by either nuke count or member count also qualify. In addition, alliances who have previously qualified will remain in the list for a reasonable period of time. All listed alliances with over 10 nukes/member Bold value is nukes/member; value in circular brackets is change from last week; values in square brackets are rankings for nuke count and total NS respectively. The Grämlins - 18.8 (+0.1) --- [4, 11] Umbrella - 16.9 (-0.5) --- [12, 35] Poison Clan - 16.9 (+0.7) --- [15, 41] -- Overtake TOP The Order Of The Paradox - 16.6 (+0.2) --- [3, 6] Molon Labe - 14.7 (+0.1) --- [25, 62] Aircastle - 12.1 (+1.0) --- [48, 121] -- Overtake Vanguard; Overtake Old Guard OMFG - 11.8 (+1.0) --- [63, 111] -- Overtake TORN; Overtake Old Guard Old Guard - 11.4 --- [34, 52] The Order Of Righteous Nations - 10.8 --- [19, 46] -- Overtake Vanguard Global Order Of Darkness - 10.3 (+0.2) --- [17, 42] -- Overtake Vanguard Vanguard - 9.9 (-1.2) --- [24, 48] -- Out but tracked while still above 8 Miscellaneous Stats - The global average nukes/player is 2.16, an increase of 0.09 from last week. - The 50 alliances considered in the main list together comprise 45% of the global membership, and hold 77% of the global nukes. - The eleven alliances to have >10 nukes/member together comprise 2.9% of the global membership, and hold 19.2% of the global nukes. - Biggest weekly gainer in terms of nukes/member is OMFG with +1.04. In the main list it's Poison Clan with +0.66. - Biggest weekly loser in terms of nukes/member is Vanguard with -1.22. (NB: I somehow had Viridian Entende's nuke count wrong last week, so gain is not given) All data as at 22/02/09 AM Edited February 22, 2009 by Chairman Cao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diomede Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Thanks for the updates. Any chance of adding Argent to the nukes per member update please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Cao Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Thanks for the updates. Any chance of adding Argent to the nukes per member update please? Since you ask nicely and have an impressive ratio, done I will probably extend the list next week to include anyone in top 50 by nuke count, which would be quite reasonable while only extending the list by a handful of alliances such as yours who deserve to be in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diomede Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Thanks, Cao. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiphosis Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 The misc stats are the best part imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiabelly Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 I think MK should be the largest gainer...we went up 277 since last week. Thanks for doing this, and for including us when we are not top 50 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Wow, any guesses on how high Polaris gets before they come to a halt? Or near to a halt. My guess is somewhere near FOK, probably a bit below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyCallMeJeezy Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Well our capacity is 1855 right now, so we'll see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Ozujsko Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Dark Templar has got some nukes...A nice amount too, for only 44 members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) It may be easier to understand and a better gauge if you simply had the to 30 (or so) highest nuke per member count in a chart of their own. I also say it because GRAN has 5.3 nukes per member and yet no mention on any charts and I'm jealous :lol: Edited February 22, 2009 by Captain Flinders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 So bets on biggest gainer for next update, MK or Polaris? It'll be close... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trace Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 So bets on biggest gainer for next update, MK or Polaris? It'll be close... So far we're up 50, they're not even up 20. No contest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petrovich4 Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 So far we're up 50, they're not even up 20. No contest Go MK Very impressive Polaris - you have good planners with you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willaim Kreiger Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 So far we're up 50, they're not even up 20. No contest Well to be fair we exhuasted our maximum possible gains a while ago when most of our nuclear capable memebers maxed out at 20 Ya'll can have this one, we've owned the last month or two Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trace Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Well to be fair we exhuasted our maximum possible gains a while ago when most of our nuclear capable memebers maxed out at 20 Ya'll can have this one, we've owned the last month or two Whelp, now its our turn to have it for a month or so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 So far we're up 50, they're not even up 20. No contest Well then, looks like that bet's over. )): nukes )): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hertugen Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 I for one am happy it is MK getting biggest gainer for a couple of updates... We in Polaris had a good run. Have fun MK. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Cao Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Dark Templar has got some nukes...A nice amount too, for only 44 members. Indeed, but you're an ally of ours, it goes without saying that you're elite It may be easier to understand and a better gauge if you simply had the to 30 (or so) highest nuke per member count in a chart of their own. I also say it because GRAN has 5.3 nukes per member and yet no mention on any charts and I'm jealous :lol: I'll consider this for future, it's not a bad suggestion but would be purely of academic interest. The reason I have so far limited it by size and nuke count is because they're both indications of power, whereas an alliance with say 10 nukes/member but only 20 members would score very high in the rankings and probably do very well on an individual basis, but still won't have much sway globally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) Argh, TOOL is gonna catch us. Catch you? we'll pass you in no time at the rate we're going Edit: We're ahead by 12 nukes now Edited February 23, 2009 by Ricardo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoomzoomzoom Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 TOOL to join the 1k nukes club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great King D Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 TOOL to join the 1k nukes club I got no nukes but in TE i got like 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 whereas an alliance with say 10 nukes/member but only 20 members would score very high in the rankings and probably do very well on an individual basis, but still won't have much sway globally. But they would have much sway in a nuclear battle on a per capita level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistedRebelDB47 Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 - Biggest weekly gainer in terms of nukes/member is OMFG with +1.04. In the main list it's Poison Clan with +0.66. Poison Clan? Who dey? It's yo boys! Great to see Polar and MK rebounding as well, I look forward to seeing you guys flying up the lists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great King D Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Poison Clan? Who dey? It's yo boys! Great to see Polar and MK rebounding as well, I look forward to seeing you guys flying up the lists. wow...lots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.