Jump to content

IC reprecussions for rule breaking


shopt

Recommended Posts

Firstly, I would like to say that this doesn't apply to any current situation. This is a hypothetical situation.

I would like to ask whether IC repercussions are allowed for breaking game rules. These are the 3 scenarios I can think of. In no cases are moderation being threatened, and in all cases the ZI is as a result of the perceived rule breaking. Personally I think B and C are okay, and A isn't, but I would like clarification.

Scenario A:

Party X feels party Y has broken a game rule (eg. slot filling), and instead reporting it to moderation, decides to ZI them.

Okay or not?

Scenario B:

Party X feels party Y has broken a game rule (eg. slot filling), reports it to moderation and ZI's them without waiting for a response from moderation.

Okay or not?

Scenario C:

Party X feels party Y has broken a game rule (eg. slot filling), reports it to moderation, feels that moderation's response was inadequate, and so decides to ZI them.

Okay or not?

Edit: maybe this should have been in the moderation forum.

Edited by shopt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...