commander thrawn Posted August 4, 2008 Report Share Posted August 4, 2008 What are the distinguishing factors between cautious aggressive etc. I know I saw a guide with this once but I have been unable to find it. Does any one type focus more on say killing soldiers or on capturing land or tech? :jihad: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Rupert Posted August 4, 2008 Report Share Posted August 4, 2008 The main distinguishing characteristic is casualties. Standard is the base. Cautious does fewer casualties, Planned and Aggressive does more casualties with Aggressive producing the greatest number of casualties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted August 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2008 The main distinguishing characteristic is casualties. Standard is the base. Cautious does fewer casualties, Planned and Aggressive does more casualties with Aggressive producing the greatest number of casualties. Is that attacking and defending? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Irwin Posted August 5, 2008 Report Share Posted August 5, 2008 (edited) I was just defeated in battle when I attacked, and yet I still managed to steal a little tech and destroy some infra and land. Does this have anything to do with the attack being "Aggressive"? Edited August 5, 2008 by King Irwin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyria Posted August 5, 2008 Report Share Posted August 5, 2008 Is that attacking and defending? yes. @ king irwin: there are results where you steal tech/land and destroy infra but 'lose' the battle. perfectly normal, it doesn't have anything to do with the attack style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted August 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2008 (edited) yes. @ king irwin: there are results where you steal tech/land and destroy infra but 'lose' the battle. perfectly normal, it doesn't have anything to do with the attack style. I need to be in more wars. But then again, nah not really. I guess that means I have done my job as a govt member. Edited August 5, 2008 by commander thrawn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Better to lose the battle and gain the land and tech than to win the battle and have nothing to show for it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.