geneclar Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 You know, the Sanction Race is essentially covered in the Rankings by Score chart (second from the top every day). Just look at who is highlighted in Green, those are the 12 alliances who would be sanctioned were it to happen today. The graphs are more difficult to read when you're trying to tell where the alliances are in respect to each other. You can get an idea, but it's nice to have numbers. Of course, I'd have no objection if you provided some. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anu Drake Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 335%? That's not right. Meant to say by 335k on the NATO jump for the previous update. Less on the one up now. And the sanction race is just that and has a little commentary. Both are absolutely essential and great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 (edited) The graphs are more difficult to read when you're trying to tell where the alliances are in respect to each other. You can get an idea, but it's nice to have numbers. Of course, I'd have no objection if you provided some. The yearning for commentary I get (no time for that most days anymore), but I'm not sure I grok this critique. If you read only columns one and two of the Score Rankings looking at who is green, you see who would get sanctioned as of today in order from biggest and baddest on down. I'm not opposed to more stats threads, but duplication of effort offends the engineer in me. What I'm getting at is, how might I improve that chart if you find it lacking?Edit: Now that I think about it, the chart is nothing BUT numbers. Edited September 5, 2007 by Unspeakable Evil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geneclar Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 (edited) The yearning for commentary I get (no time for that most days anymore), but I'm not sure I grok this critique. If you read only columns one and two of the Score Rankings looking at who is green, you see who would get sanctioned as of today in order from biggest and baddest on down. I'm not opposed to more stats threads, but duplication of effort offends the engineer in me. What I'm getting at is, how might I improve that chart if you find it lacking?Edit: Now that I think about it, the chart is nothing BUT numbers. What I meant was that I personally like to see numbers, rather than lines. It gives me a better idea of where things stand, especially when the graphs have to be split because of how many lines there are. Your work is really useful and impressive, don't get me wrong. EDIT: Oh, I see what you're saying. I skipped the charts, I'm not sure why. I apologize, I can't believe I didn't see them at all. Edited September 5, 2007 by geneclar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleksanderr Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Ahhhh Yeaaaaaa..... I was waiting for this to get posted on these forums. The itch has finally stopped, now that I have my UE fix of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amiles Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 I guess some people have way too much time up their hands. I thought I was sad when I used to make one graph for my alliance. But yikes! Oh wall thanks for doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCToker Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 He said on the IF forums (just before they got shut-off) that doing this only takes him like 30-minutes or so a day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFedistan Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Wonderfully useful, thank you! It's data-tacular. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 Updated 2007-09-05. I guess some people have way too much time up their hands. I thought I was sad when I used to make one graph for my alliance. But yikes! Oh wall thanks for doing it. Everyone who thinks I should continue to waste my time, please declare war on amiles here. Thanks. He said on the IF forums (just before they got shut-off) that doing this only takes him like 30-minutes or so a day. About 20 minutes today, from start to now. Wonderfully useful, thank you! It's data-tacular. Anytime. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garbunkel Posted September 5, 2007 Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 OOC: Thank you your your time and effort, these are a great way to look at CN differently. I'm glad we have someone with your abilities to be able to provide this! ALSO, you have not shown the non-aligned stats? With the potentially largest group, it would interesting to see these also! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 5, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2007 You have not shown the non-aligned stats? With the potentially largest group, it would interesting to see these also! Unaligned to whom? My goal is to try and hit the biggest X alliances (where X is currently 57). There may well be 100M NS outside of these alliances*, but it isn't really feasible to harvest the data for 1,000 2-10 man alliances to get it. ---- * No, there isn't. There are 15,345 nations in the alliances I tracked today weighing in at 173,117,876 NS. According to the World Demographics page there are 31,421 nations on Bob. The nations (in general) outside of the top 57 are very likely much weaker. If you don't believe me, ask \m/ why they complain about there not being enough tech raid targets in their range. If there were 10 member nobody alliances with Gramlins-style average strength, they'd have been harvested months ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pseudodragon Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 Great job! But you need to change the scale on the Alliance Nukes per Nation chart. TOP broke the graph. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DictatorPhilTaylor Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 Who is keeping track of the Power Bloc's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 Updated 2007-09-06. Who is keeping track of the Power Bloc's? Not I. I probably track everyone in WUT/UJP and what used to be GUARD. As far as I know, the other power blocs are kind of not big enough for me to really care about enough to track their constituent alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midkn1ght Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not that it matters overall, I suppose, but GOD's color is listed as red, when we really increased according to the numbers. Threw me in a fit for a second looking for a deserter, lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 Not that it matters overall, I suppose, but GOD's color is listed as red, when we really increased according to the numbers. Threw me in a fit for a second looking for a deserter, lol I'm going to assume you are talking about GOD being red on the rankings by nation strength. That's because their growth was below average (2.43% from last Thursday) is below the average growth (2.87%). If that isn't what you meant, please clarify. I'm helpful like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cylon Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 Nice UE, Glad to see you moved along with the new forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 Updated 2007-09-07. Some big numbers for my Goonicans yesterday. It's almost like they were preparing for some kind of surprise party. I hope it was one with cake. And beer. And ice. And steak. The world may never know. :iiam: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soviet Canuckistan Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 (edited) Oh man, I'm liking that GOONS line today. GATO's also going to pass GOLD, that's amazing. Edited September 7, 2007 by Soviet Canuckistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boscher Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 I really enjoy these stats, thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 OOC: I don't believe I post this prior, but thats a very nice effort there working on this all, UE. And a excellent work it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickenzilla Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 Atlantis and NATO are going up like madness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyman Posted September 7, 2007 Report Share Posted September 7, 2007 looks hmm interesting, nice work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCToker Posted September 8, 2007 Report Share Posted September 8, 2007 Well... on the IF forums, you said to let you know when RnR hits 1 mill, well, we did it last night: http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance...sp?Alliance=RnR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted September 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2007 Updated 2007-09-08. Well... on the IF forums, you said to let you know when RnR hits 1 mill, well, we did it last night:http://www.cybernations.net/stats_alliance...sp?Alliance=RnR I've been tracking since the last RnR guy pointed out you were around 950k or so. Monday or Tuesday you should start showing up on the rankings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.