sayton Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 I am just curious.. Cause i dont know any of these weird miltary wonders just yet... :-D sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardoon Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Anti Air Defense, and then Foreign Air Force Base IMHO. Unless you plan to go Nuke Rogue - then Hidden Silo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted February 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Anti Air Defense, and then Foreign Air Force Base IMHO.Unless you plan to go Nuke Rogue - then Hidden Silo. i dont really plan to be going rogue any time soon.. :-D and as for the AAD i dont think ive ever really gotten attked much with aircrafts.. soo i dont know.. maybe its pointless.. but i HAVE attked alot with aircrafts.. soo i thought the FAFB would be better.. i dunno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardoon Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 i dont really plan to be going rogue any time soon.. :-Dand as for the AAD i dont think ive ever really gotten attked much with aircrafts.. soo i dont know.. maybe its pointless.. but i HAVE attked alot with aircrafts.. soo i thought the FAFB would be better.. i dunno AAD saves you infra regardless of whether it's nukes or cms. FAFB increases the amount of damage you can do. By my philosophy, preserve your nation first and then destroy others. AAD followed by FAFB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Rupert Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 AAD saves you infra regardless of whether it's nukes or cms. Not sure this statement is factual though. The description states: Reduces aircraft attack damages against your nation -10%. I don't see nukes or cms being considered aircraft in this regard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted February 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 Not sure this statement is factual though. The description states:I don't see nukes or cms being considered aircraft in this regard. yea me neither Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 AADN and FAFB are both good buys. Buy one, then the other. I personally would go with FAFB because then you can both send more fighters (10 I think), but you can have 20 more to defend. AADN only defends, while FAFB helps attacking and defending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myruler Posted February 28, 2008 Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 HNS. Those extra 5 nukes can do some harm in a major battle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted February 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2008 HNS. Those extra 5 nukes can do some harm in a major battle. i havent been in any nuke wars yet.. lol thank god.. i dont know if i ever will.. well see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viluin Posted February 29, 2008 Report Share Posted February 29, 2008 (edited) I'd pick the Foreign Air Force Base. It increases your offensive capabilities and your defense against aircraft. Those 20 fighters will drastically decrease the chance of someone destroying your infra unless they too have this wonder. 50 planes vs 70-80.. Edited February 29, 2008 by Viluin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted March 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 I'd pick the Foreign Air Force Base. It increases your offensive capabilities and your defense against aircraft. Those 20 fighters will drastically decrease the chance of someone destroying your infra unless they too have this wonder. 50 planes vs 70-80.. i think im sticking to FAFB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esukaresu Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 FAB or Pentagon. The first is pretty self explanatory, but the 2nd one is just under-rated by a majority of players. An extra 10% can mean the difference between victory and defeat in a war. That being said, losing 75 miles of land, 20 infra, and maybe 1mil can hurt quite a bit. It's kinda like the SDI really, it'll pay off itself once you win a number of ground attacks, and you're able to put it to more use than the SDI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HordeOfDoom Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 (edited) Hidden Silo then FAFB then Pentagon Silo not for the extra 5 nukes, but for the way in which modern wars are being fought - I'd get that wonder for the ability to have 5 spy-immune nukes. Especially in the GPA and NADC wars, we've seen nukes destroyed in the hundreds in the first days of the war, so to retain an effective arsenal a hidden silo is a must. FAFB and Pentagon for reasons others have explained. AADN is useless, cause with a FAFB, you'll never be defeated in the air anyways, so why do you need less damage taken? Edited March 3, 2008 by HordeOfDoom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enderland Posted March 4, 2008 Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 FAB or Pentagon. The first is pretty self explanatory, but the 2nd one is just under-rated by a majority of players. An extra 10% can mean the difference between victory and defeat in a war. That being said, losing 75 miles of land, 20 infra, and maybe 1mil can hurt quite a bit. It's kinda like the SDI really, it'll pay off itself once you win a number of ground attacks, and you're able to put it to more use than the SDI. If it actually provided 10% odds increase, then yes, I would agree that it's underrated. Unfortunately it does not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted March 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2008 FAB or Pentagon. The first is pretty self explanatory, but the 2nd one is just under-rated by a majority of players. An extra 10% can mean the difference between victory and defeat in a war. That being said, losing 75 miles of land, 20 infra, and maybe 1mil can hurt quite a bit. It's kinda like the SDI really, it'll pay off itself once you win a number of ground attacks, and you're able to put it to more use than the SDI. 7 days of a war.. times 2 spy ops per day MAX nukes i can lose is 14... out of 20... but keep in mind.. i have EIGHT HUNDRED spies.. i dont think any spy ops done against me will be successfull none the less and anyone tries is retarded.. I dont know, i think im sticking to FAFB now, and then missle silo... does that sound good?? ps: as for pentagon... my soldiers already do massive dmg and are strng enuff laready.. i dont doubt their strength.. :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 (edited) 3-5-2008 - Four new wonders will be added to the game soon as indicated with Green Text in the Information Index. These wonders are designed for the very late game and include infrastructure level requirements of 12K and up. i think i have made my choice :-) Edited March 5, 2008 by sayton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 FAB or Pentagon. The first is pretty self explanatory, but the 2nd one is just under-rated by a majority of players. An extra 10% can mean the difference between victory and defeat in a war. That being said, losing 75 miles of land, 20 infra, and maybe 1mil can hurt quite a bit. It's kinda like the SDI really, it'll pay off itself once you win a number of ground attacks, and you're able to put it to more use than the SDI. "Increases ground attack battle strength +10%." I think Pentagon only helps you attack, I don't think it helps you defend. 7 days of a war..times 2 spy ops per day MAX nukes i can lose is 14... out of 20... but keep in mind.. i have EIGHT HUNDRED spies.. i dont think any spy ops done against me will be successfull none the less and anyone tries is retarded.. I dont know, i think im sticking to FAFB now, and then missle silo... does that sound good?? ps: as for pentagon... my soldiers already do massive dmg and are strng enuff laready.. i dont doubt their strength.. :-D Nations with equal spies should get about 40% odds against each other (assuming they all are on severe alert). That's about 5 or 6 nukes lost during the war assuming someone equal to you tries to spy on you every day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 i dont think anyone will really ave 800 spies attking me :-D its ok.. im fine.. well see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 3-5-2008- Four new wonders will be added to the game soon as indicated with Green Text in the Information Index. These wonders are designed for the very late game and include infrastructure level requirements of 12K and up. i think i have made my choice :-) Could you link me to that Sayton? Thanks Damn, I was stopping at 9k infra and just building my warchest but I may be forced to go to 12k infra now if these wonders look any good. Bye-bye $300 million warchest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayton Posted March 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 yea those wonders are DEFINITELY GANNA be worth it.,. just click "wonders" panel in your home page on your nation.. lol the new ones are in green.. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Nice Looks interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.