Jump to content

Pigs and Lead issue

Antartica North

Recommended Posts

Soldier Upkeep Cost [per soldier]

I was looking over the resources sheet and thought to myself it was possible that if Improvements are applied before resource bonuses, that upkeep costs would go into the minuses.

I dilligently contacted some other nations with Pigs and Lead as a resource and was dissapointed. However, I did find something else.

Lead – Lowers initial cruise missile and nuclear weapon cost and upkeep cost -20%, lowers aircraft upkeep cost -25%, lowers tank purchase and upkeep costs -8%, lowers soldier upkeep cost -$0.50.

Pigs - Lowers soldier upkeep cost -$0.50, increases solder efficiency +15%, and increases population +3.5%.

It seems that nations that trade pigs and lead, only $0.50 is taken from the upkeep, rather than the full $1 which having both Pigs and Lead ought to do.

-barracks -10%, g.camps -10%

-lead -$0.50, pigs -$0.50

base = $2

with pigs + lead = 1.5 = This should be 1.0 if both pigs and lead are applied.

with 5barracks = 1.0

with 5barracks + pigs + lead = 0.75

with 5barracks and 4g.camps = 0.6

with 5barracks and 5g.camps = 0.5

with 5barracks and 4g.camps + pigs + lead = 0.45

Hope this information is useful


Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, thats imho a flaw, because if you already have pigs, lead is even less useful and its not a good resource anyway... these boni should stack, like for Iron and Oil. At least I see no reason why Iron, Oil and Pigs stack and Lead not -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...