Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Claude

DUmb war story

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, General Kanabis said:

After a momentary setback, people from both sides have come together to make this happen.

Presenting the official war wiki- name tbd- 

https://cybernations.fandom.com/wiki/Roll_For_Initiative_-_COBRA_War

 

I'd like to thank @Walshington @J Andres @Bobogoobo and especially @Smitty256 for his cooperation.

 

2y12gd.gif

 

 

 

I'm just glad we were able to work together on it.  Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, DeathAdder said:

 

I think you're going for "Shoddy"

haha  that's it.... :facepalm:

 

O death what would I do without you!

 

Al Bundy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/8/2019 at 2:00 AM, General Kanabis said:

After a momentary setback, people from both sides have come together to make this happen.

Presenting the official war wiki- name tbd- 

https://cybernations.fandom.com/wiki/Roll_For_Initiative_-_COBRA_War

 

I'd like to thank @Walshington @J Andres @Bobogoobo and especially @Smitty256 for his cooperation.

 

2y12gd.gif

 

 

 

Maybe the wiki departments of the respective alliances should fun the FA department!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Walshington said:

 

Maybe the wiki departments of the respective alliances should fun the FA department!

 

Ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess not, makes sense really.

 

Cause y'know if they did, that might escalate things to a point where RFI can't hold their own against who might join to assist NG.

 

I suppose the point is it's quite laughable that FTW felt the need to activate RFI against a few micros in order to curbstomp them. Now they've got the more threatening COBRA front covered with RFI support I guess they feel they can take NG on solo!

 

Godspeed and all that!

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:

I guess not, makes sense really.

 

Cause y'know if they did, that might escalate things to a point where RFI can't hold their own against who might join to assist NG.

 

I suppose the point is it's quite laughable that FTW felt the need to activate RFI against a few micros in order to curbstomp them. Now they've got the more threatening COBRA front covered with RFI support I guess they feel they can take NG on solo!

 

Godspeed and all that!

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chicken Hawks I guess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:

I guess not, makes sense really.

 

Cause y'know if they did, that might escalate things to a point where RFI can't hold their own against who might join to assist NG.

 

I suppose the point is it's quite laughable that FTW felt the need to activate RFI against a few micros in order to curbstomp them. Now they've got the more threatening COBRA front covered with RFI support I guess they feel they can take NG on solo!

 

Godspeed and all that!

If you're going to talk out of your butthole, I will just respond with memes. This format is the gift that keeps on giving!

2z6rzt.jpg
(My former allies in NG disbanded like last year)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Tevron said:

If you're going to talk out of your butthole, I will just respond with memes. This format is the gift that keeps on giving!

2z6rzt.jpg
(My former allies in NG disbanded like last year)

 

Hey man not cool, I had an operation to replace my mouth with my butt hole after a horrible accident and I'm pretty sensitive about it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Tevron said:

If you're going to talk out of your butthole, I will just respond with memes. This format is the gift that keeps on giving!

2z6rzt.jpg
(My former allies in NG disbanded like last year)

 

That wouldn't be a problem if you guys didn't claim to defend your allies against ANYONE who attacked them (disbanded/or otherwise) but The Legion for example, was very adamant about that. RFI policy change since then?

Article III: Rolling for InitiativeEdit

If any member of RFI is attacked, all players shall enter combat. Roll for Initiative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, General Kanabis said:

 

That wouldn't be a problem if you guys didn't claim to defend your allies against ANYONE who attacked them (disbanded/or otherwise) but The Legion for example, was very adamant about that. RFI policy change since then?

Article III: Rolling for InitiativeEdit

If any member of RFI is attacked, all players shall enter combat. Roll for Initiative.

Apparently, legion, GaTO, claws et al are too tied up with micros to handle fulfilling the treaty obligations they so nobly emphasized they had to honor against TIE, RSA, Sellswords, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, General Kanabis said:

 

That wouldn't be a problem if you guys didn't claim to defend your allies against ANYONE who attacked them (disbanded/or otherwise) but The Legion for example, was very adamant about that. RFI policy change since then?

Article III: Rolling for InitiativeEdit

If any member of RFI is attacked, all players shall enter combat. Roll for Initiative.

 

It isn't a problem at all, who is this a problem for exactly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tevron said:

 

It isn't a problem at all, who is this a problem for exactly?

 

For RFI apparently because they need to be "activated" to defend their ally, except of course for when it is convenient to claim otherwise.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, General Kanabis said:

 

For RFI apparently because they need to be "activated" to defend their ally, except of course for when it is convenient to claim otherwise.

 

 

For reference, here's what was said in another DoW thread by RFI:
 

Quote

 

Excuse us for honoring a mutual defense pact in defense of an ally!

From the same thread:

Quote

I genuinely couldnt care less about you or your non AA. Legion will defend our allies to the last pixel in any circumstance and i think your actually the one who is bitter because you have no ally who would do the same for you. Ave Legio forever!

Quote

 At least our allies actually honor the treaties they made with us, unlike TIE.


And so now, when another party declares war on an ally, you all haven't jumped in like you did when it was the likes of TIE and SRA.
I'll just leave this quote from a disinterested third party to explain why this make you all look bad.

Quote

This seems  a little backwards.  This small alliances went to war for an all ally against a much larger alliance with much larger allies.  That is far more impressive than jumping in to attack somebody who is already out manned and out gunned.  So not try and play this is off as some noble defense of an ally.  They were never in any danger unless you think your ally is completely incompetent.  The fact is your bored and saw a war you could role into that would cost you nothing.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Tankobite said:

For reference, here's what was said in another DoW thread by RFI:
 

From the same thread:


And so now, when another party declares war on an ally, you all haven't jumped in like you did when it was the likes of TIE and SRA.
I'll just leave this quote from a disinterested third party to explain why this make you all look bad.

 

 

This is the correct take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very problematic conflicting statements in a document. 

 

Guess they should revise the charter mid-war to better reflect policy. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/23/2019 at 8:13 AM, Lucius Optimus said:

Very problematic conflicting statements in a document. 

 

Guess they should revise the charter mid-war to better reflect policy. 

 

 

Have you notice how, whenever called on their hypocrisy, they go radio silent?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Tankobite said:

Have you notice how, whenever called on their hypocrisy, they go radio silent?

To be fair, it's hard to measure radio silence levels accurately with all the tumbleweed flying around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Tankobite said:

Have you notice how, whenever called on their hypocrisy, they go radio silent?

Disagreeing with how someone does something does not it hypocritical make.

 

The deep irony of you as a TIE member talking about honoring treaties is not lost on anyone here, not even the tumbleweeds.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Tevron said:

Disagreeing with how someone does something does not it hypocritical make.

 

The deep irony of you as a TIE member talking about honoring treaties is not lost on anyone here, not even the tumbleweeds.
 

Ah, but the silence surrounded nongrata’s attacks on your treaty ally speaks volumes about what worth your honor is.   Our choice to stand with our ally—the little guy, no matter the cost to us, is thunderous about ours.

 

RFI is a lion when attacking a chipmunk, but when there’s a chance they might have to fight another major power, they’re a pussycat.

 

 

edit: And from the commentary I’ve seen, the world knows it. 

Edited by Tankobite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Tankobite said:

 

RFI is a lion when attacking a chipmunk, but when there’s a chance they might have to fight another major power, they’re a pussycat.

 

 

Tankobite,

 

To what do you refer? I'm unaware of any meaningful alliance that has attacked any signatory of RFI?

 

Sincerely,

Joseph M. Black

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tevron said:

 

 

The deep irony of you as a TIE member talking about honoring treaties is not lost on anyone here, not even the tumbleweeds.
 

If you didn’t read the earlier post, here’s what a third party had to say regarding our choice to defend an ally vs yours.

 

“This seems  a little backwards.  This small alliances went to war for an all ally against a much larger alliance with much larger allies.  That is far more impressive than jumping in to attack somebody who is already out manned and out gunned.  So not try and play this is off as some noble defense of an ally.  They were never in any danger unless you think your ally is completely incompetent.  The fact is your bored and saw a war you could role into that would cost you nothing.“

 

This is what isn’t lost on anyone here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Joseph Black said:

 

Tankobite,

 

To what do you refer? I'm unaware of any meaningful alliance that has attacked any signatory of RFI?

 

Sincerely,

Joseph M. Black

Ah, ok. I didn’t realize delusion was a foreign policy principle of RFI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...