Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
im317

rankings bug

Recommended Posts

Jerel is the #1 nation by NS with 1,928,672.88. oddly he is listed at #2 when you sort by strength. conversely Cuba has 1,831,764.03 NS and is listed at #1

https://www.cybernations.net/allNations_display.asp?Page=1&Order=DESC&Field=Strength

 

this might just be a display error, but deepening on how the +/-250 is done it could affect that too depending on what it checks for the rankings.

Edited by im317

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably because NS is capped, Cuba is first because he achieved 1,000,000.000 first. The 1,928,672.88 and 1,831,764.03 NS numbers do not exist in the game because of the cap so can't be used to do the ranking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then why are the rankings on there nation pages correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its also incorrect on the top 10 listing you see when logged out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, im317 said:

then why are the rankings on there nation pages correct?

 

On their nation pages they both say Ranked #1 of 3,193 Nations, so the game is seeing them as tied and the order of ranking is being decided by something else.

Could be that cuba got their first, it could be that cuba's nation is a tiny bit older or it could be something else. When senators tie in elections it is not clear how it picks who gets the last seat if there are 4 other people with more votes than them (it's not oldest nation or first to collect that many vote).

Edited by Galerion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in senate it is who has more NS. i dont see why we have an NS cap anymore. its not like it adds to the number of nations that can hit or be hit. removing it would clear this up without having any other effect. these are not the days of a 35k NS cap when it increased the number of nations that the capped nations could hit or be hit bye. now its just +/-250. and if anything the range that can be hit should be decreased both due to the dramatically smaller player base and the massively increased gap between the top nations and the low end of there declaration range. of course that is a subject for another thread, but fixing this can be done fairly easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, im317 said:

in senate it is who has more NS.

 

Fairly sure it isn't NS, I've witnessed a few tie situations in the past and I believe I've seen a tie where a lower NS got the seat because that was what I originally thought would decide it.

Edited by Galerion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

99% sure its NS. Maroon senate has had some close races the past few months. 3 nations at 68 now and they are in order by NS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the run up to the end if the are tied it ranks them by NS but I think I remember Hardin getting on brown despite being shown as 6th place while tied before the vote closed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it sure would be nice if someone could give us a definitive answer to these things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...