hartfw Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 (edited) Some people feel neutrals should be protected, like delicious animals with government support like solar power. Some people feel like neutrals should be rolled for their land, like fat cows in need of milking. Some people feel the need to sign pacts of neutrality with neutral alliances. Cowboys at this time have no stance on neutrals. Thanks for bearing with tonights FA updates. Tomorrow promises more of the same. Edited July 1, 2016 by hartfw
The Zigur Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 Now I feel like doing this, but with big walls of text and lots of producerism.
Lord Hitchcock Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 1 minute ago, Immortan Junka said: Now I feel like doing this, but with big walls of text and lots of producerism. please do, that would be a valid CB for M Inc to hit POSSE
Auctor Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 While I don't fully agree with this position, I'm sure Cowboys thought about it long and hard and had a serious debate before arriving to this conclusion.
The Zigur Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 16 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said: please do, that would be a valid CB for M Inc to hit POSSE How are you going to bandwaggon every war if you are in anarchy another two months?
Lord Hitchcock Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 Just now, Immortan Junka said: How are you going to bandwaggon every war if you are in anarchy another two months? test the waters my friend. and watch your fate occur
autosave36 Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 I applaud your bold stance on neutrality. Ride on Cowboys.
White Chocolate Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 12 hours ago, hartfw said: . Cowboys at this time have no stance on neutrals. Would Cowboys take a stance on neutrals if Jack officially recognized them?
Lord Hitchcock Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 45 minutes ago, White Chocolate said: Would Cowboys take a stance on neutrals if Jack officially recognized them? Jacks recognition has been so diluted down that it doesn't have much of a prestigious effect anymore
hartfw Posted July 1, 2016 Author Report Posted July 1, 2016 1 hour ago, White Chocolate said: Would Cowboys take a stance on neutrals if Jack officially recognized them? I don't really like dealing in hypotheticals if they can be avoided.
Wyatt Earp Posted July 4, 2016 Report Posted July 4, 2016 On 01/07/2016 at 2:26 PM, hartfw said: Cowboys at this time have no stance on neutrals. Thanks for bearing with tonights FA updates. Tomorrow promises more of the same. No stance and no content. I recommend you get back to the quality we know you can produce. Locked
Recommended Posts