AlmightyGrub Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 4 minutes ago, Van Hoo III said: To be fair, Chim and Ava got into peace mode when MI6 was hit. I would love to say that this will help Polar and NADC move on from their grudges, but I know that it won't. What do you say when an ally attacks an ally? "Good luck"? No. "Have fun!"? No. I'm at a loss. I hope for a draw. I am currently in a coupe of wars, so not exactly hiding in Peace Mode. Given their supposed hate, a normal observer would conclude they want a piece of Grub, but they are driven by fear not hate. They are right to fear me, they have met me before. Sorry Hoo, there will not be a draw today or any other day, just the death gurgle of a once mediocre alliance passing its last breath. NADC wanted this match up, they signed a treaty to get this match up and now this match up will be their epitaph. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zygon Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 2 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said: I am currently in a coupe of wars, so not exactly hiding in Peace Mode. Given their supposed hate, a normal observer would conclude they want a piece of Grub, but they are driven by fear not hate. They are right to fear me, they have met me before. Sorry Hoo, there will not be a draw today or any other day, just the death gurgle of a once mediocre alliance passing its last breath. NADC wanted this match up, they signed a treaty to get this match up and now this match up will be their epitaph. You boiz see this salt? I think we got us a goofy goober! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxHouseArrestXx Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 2 minutes ago, Zygon said: You boiz see this salt? I think we got us a goofy goober! I laughed just a bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Hershey Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 NADC's actual casus belli of this war, could this be the beginning of a blue civil war?!: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Quality comics lately Hershey, kudos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxHouseArrestXx Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 6 minutes ago, Lord Hershey said: NADC's actual casus belli of this war, could this be the beginning of a blue civil war?!: That was wonderful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cazaric Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Lord Hershey said: NADC's actual casus belli of this war, could this be the beginning of a blue civil war?!: Well, darn it. I have to vote for Aurelius now. That was fantastic. Edited June 13, 2016 by Cazaric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 24 minutes ago, XxHouseArrestXx said: That was wonderful. Not even a fantasy writer could come up with such wishful thinking. I just see bravado, that feeling when you get a few of your ''mates'' together, gee each other up and charge headlong into the gates of hell. You sound pretty convincing, but then you die as expected. Welcome to hell, may your stay be long and eventful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Hitchcock Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 It just saddens be that NADC had never attempted to work with Polar diplomatically Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XxHouseArrestXx Posted June 13, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 7 minutes ago, AlmightyGrub said: Not even a fantasy writer could come up with such wishful thinking. I just see bravado, that feeling when you get a few of your ''mates'' together, gee each other up and charge headlong into the gates of hell. You sound pretty convincing, but then you die as expected. Welcome to hell, may your stay be long and eventful. Please try harder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zygon Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 1 minute ago, Lord Hitchcock said: It just saddens be that NADC had never attempted to work with Polar diplomatically lol k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chunky Monkey Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 2 minutes ago, Lord Hitchcock said: It just saddens be that NADC had never attempted to work with Polar diplomatically Ah, another case of your sources failing you. We sent a diplomat over after the senate issue but said diplomat was flatly told that Polar had no interest in resolving the issue diplomatically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 20 minutes ago, Chunky Monkey said: Ah, another case of your sources failing you. We sent a diplomat over after the senate issue but said diplomat was flatly told that Polar had no interest in resolving the issue diplomatically. Not precisely true but effective enough. We are resolving the issue exactly how we wanted to. Enjoy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I, umm. Conflicted. :/ Guess I'll just drop a "Sengoku sucks ass" and be on with my day... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Buscemi Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 11PM blitz, lol. I guess NpO gets to roll NADC again for old times sake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 God speed NADC. Ehum de Allah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helbrecht Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 I am with Gibs on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duderonomy Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Blue on blue crime is an answer. NpO gonna bring it to ya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isolatar Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Good luck to my friends in NADC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 9 hours ago, Van Hoo III said: To be fair, Chim and Ava got into peace mode when MI6 was hit. I would love to say that this will help Polar and NADC move on from their grudges, but I know that it won't. What do you say when an ally attacks an ally? "Good luck"? No. "Have fun!"? No. I'm at a loss. I hope for a draw. Once upon a time a valiant warrior left his AA when the AA's leader made a choice not to defend his ally from a curb stomp just because he had allies on the curbstomping side. (If you are confused because I am tired and not being clear, Hoo left RoK to defend NpO even though RoK and SF were connected to the offensive side) So Hoo, at the time you went with the ally that needed help and was hit with a shoddy CB, what changed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edward Reed Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 Have fun out there NADC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van Hoo III Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 (edited) 57 minutes ago, berbers said: Once upon a time a valiant warrior left his AA when the AA's leader made a choice not to defend his ally from a curb stomp just because he had allies on the curbstomping side. (If you are confused because I am tired and not being clear, Hoo left RoK to defend NpO even though RoK and SF were connected to the offensive side) So Hoo, at the time you went with the ally that needed help and was hit with a shoddy CB, what changed? Sup berbers. There are a few differences. I was not leading RoK at the time* and didn't have a hand in Taut's decision to give VE the green light (which he later attempted to rescind lol ) to hit their own allies in Polar ... but I am leading (along with Shuru and Rampage) TBC, so the decision to go to war and against whom is partially mine. We're also already at war with MI6, so me leaving to defend someone else (or influencing TBC to change course, if that's the question) wouldn't really be appropriate or fair to our allies that we agreed to attack with or our members. In the prior situation, Polar didn't choose to go to war but were instead declared on due to RoK's decisions. VE made it pretty clear to me that had Taut said "No, that's not cool" that they either wouldn't have attacked or would have found another way. Polar was wronged (and VE as well, though they weren't attacked for it) and I could not in good conscience sit and let them burn for it, especially when the treaty had my own name on it. In this situation, NADC made a choice to fight. While I understand their reasons and am perfectly fine with it, we didn't wrong them or make a decision that caused this. They aren't being unfairly attacked, but are simply assisting an ally in defending one of theirs. NADC and TBC are on opposite sides here, but it's something we've known was probably going to ultimately end up that way. We both understand why and how this all happened and it doesn't really negatively impact our relationship. Lastly, I (for some reason) have a love affair with parenthesis today. * Had I been, obviously none of that would have happened. Edited June 13, 2016 by Van Hoo III Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orville Reginbacher Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 7 hours ago, Steve Buscemi said: 11PM blitz, lol. I guess NpO gets to roll NADC again for old times sake. I heard NADC was going to bring GUARD back after this war to help rebuild. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 NADC probably has bigger warchests than Polar tbh. All they have to do is nuke turret the whole war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helbrecht Posted June 13, 2016 Report Share Posted June 13, 2016 1 hour ago, Van Hoo III said: Sup berbers. There are a few differences. I was not leading RoK at the time* and didn't have a hand in Taut's decision to give VE the green light (which he later attempted to rescind lol ) to hit their own allies in Polar ... but I am leading (along with Shuru and Rampage) TBC, so the decision to go to war and against whom is partially mine. We're also already at war with MI6, so me leaving to defend someone else (or influencing TBC to change course, if that's the question) wouldn't really be appropriate or fair to our allies that we agreed to attack with or our members. In the prior situation, Polar didn't choose to go to war but were instead declared on due to RoK's decisions. VE made it pretty clear to me that had Taut said "No, that's not cool" that they either wouldn't have attacked or would have found another way. Polar was wronged (and VE as well, though they weren't attacked for it) and I could not in good conscience sit and let them burn for it, especially when the treaty had my own name on it. In this situation, NADC made a choice to fight. While I understand their reasons and am perfectly fine with it, we didn't wrong them or make a decision that caused this. They aren't being unfairly attacked, but are simply assisting an ally in defending one of theirs. NADC and TBC are on opposite sides here, but it's something we've known was probably going to ultimately end up that way. We both understand why and how this all happened and it doesn't really negatively impact our relationship. Lastly, I (for some reason) have a love affair with parenthesis today. * Had I been, obviously none of that would have happened. You said you were not gonna wall of text anymore!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.