gold2855 Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 War has been declared on United Sovereign nations. TO VICTORY!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 That would be interesting, but doesn't explain why you are also fighting VE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gold2855 Posted December 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Those two nations have proven to be unworthy to be a part of VE so they must be destroyed. TO VICTORY!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Margrave Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I think someone needs a prescription of scope and self awareness, stat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I think someone needs a prescription of scope and self awareness, stat. True, very true, but Chairmen Xiao would approve of his primary target just on irony and comedic value alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I like the idea of random people within an alliance declaring war on whoever they feel like, chaos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I like the idea of random people within an alliance declaring war on whoever they feel like, chaos. Loose translation; Mogar is issuing a FOI request for the communique between who ever runs USN these days and VE's FA dept so he can lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgrum Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I like the idea of random people within an alliance declaring war on whoever they feel like, chaos. I rather like the sheep waiting to be told what nations to hit from a list provided by some random gov official. Sitting on an AA waiting for the annual war is the equivalent to rotting. Apathy wins and more people depart, then you get the horrific conditions of alliances who simply exsist for the formality of supposed online friendship. Its an anguish cycle that should be destroyed as soon as possible for the benefit of the world as a whole. It wont be of course but waxing poetic is about all thats left, 3 min of your life you will never get back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I rather like the sheep waiting to be told what nations to hit from a list provided by some random gov official. Sitting on an AA waiting for the annual war is the equivalent to rotting. Apathy wins and more people depart, then you get the horrific conditions of alliances who simply exsist for the formality of supposed online friendship. Its an anguish cycle that should be destroyed as soon as possible for the benefit of the world as a whole. It wont be of course but waxing poetic is about all thats left, 3 min of your life you will never get back. I am sorry that your experience within alliances has not matched up to mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick GhostWolf Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I rather like the sheep waiting to be told what nations to hit from a list provided by some random gov official. Sitting on an AA waiting for the annual war is the equivalent to rotting. Apathy wins and more people depart, then you get the horrific conditions of alliances who simply exsist for the formality of supposed online friendship. Its an anguish cycle that should be destroyed as soon as possible for the benefit of the world as a whole. It wont be of course but waxing poetic is about all thats left, 3 min of your life you will never get back. quit whining and play TE if you want more fights. while you sit and wait for the "yearly war" we get in two wars a month. the people who are capable of changing the status quo here in CN aren't going to because they stand to lose if they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I get in two wars a month here :awesome: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick GhostWolf Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I get in two wars a month here :awesome: yeah, i know, you brag about each one like they were the battle of the bulge. i build your NS in one day in TE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 yeah, i know, you brag about each one like they were the battle of the bulge. i build your NS in one day in TE. I reject your Infrastructurist mentality. Nation strength is not the ends, its the means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick GhostWolf Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 (edited) I reject your Infrastructurist mentality. Nation strength is not the ends, its the means. look, if you're gonna sit around and act like a bad-ass because you hide at an NS reserved for the newbies you like to prey upon to boost your ego, i got bad news for you: nobody is buying it. also, did you actually just use the word "infrastructurist"? Edited December 26, 2015 by Nick GhostWolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 look, if you're gonna sit around and act like a bad-ass because you hide at an NS reserved for the newbies you like to prey upon to boost your ego, i got bad news for you: nobody is buying it. also, did you actually just use the word "infrastructurist"? Cool, lets do this. I sit in the low tier for two reasons: first, at this strength my nation is a perfect command bunker, I don't have to waste time dealing with a constant stream of rogues trying to gain reputation. At this size, no matter who engages me, the damage done is meaningless and certainly offset by my own capabilities. Second, it allows me to control the activity of our low tier more effectively, as I can directly intervene in wars that are disruptive to tech production without having to rely on noobs and a delayed bureaucratic reaction. And yes, infrastructurism is a thing in SNX. Maybe if you studied it, Polar would not still have asinine warchest requirements for low-tier members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radoje Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Hey guys, calm down, take it easy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick GhostWolf Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Cool, lets do this. I sit in the low tier for two reasons: first, at this strength my nation is a perfect command bunker, I don't have to waste time dealing with a constant stream of rogues trying to gain reputation. At this size, no matter who engages me, the damage done is meaningless and certainly offset by my own capabilities. Second, it allows me to control the activity of our low tier more effectively, as I can directly intervene in wars that are disruptive to tech production without having to rely on noobs and a delayed bureaucratic reaction. And yes, infrastructurism is a thing in SNX. Maybe if you studied it, Polar would not still have asinine warchest requirements for low-tier members. 1. so you're saying, "nothing risked, nothing lost" is your modus operandi? coward. by your own logic, the damage you do is also meaningless. 2. there shouldn't be any bureaucratic action, if you're the leader. you are the leader, right? you give the order, it gets done. or are you having trouble with that? Polaris certainly doesn't have a problem with wars disrupting tech production. 3. 30 days of bill payments is not "asinine". or are you trying to say that you couldn't even meet that very minimal requirement? and slow it down there sparky, i was talking about TE - and yes, you do need to have infrastructure and you're on a limited time frame to get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 1. so you're saying, "nothing risked, nothing lost" is your modus operandi? coward. by your own logic, the damage you do is also meaningless. 2. there shouldn't be any bureaucratic action, if you're the leader. you are the leader, right? you give the order, it gets done. or are you having trouble with that? Polaris certainly doesn't have a problem with wars disrupting tech production. 3. 30 days of bill payments is not "asinine". or are you trying to say that you couldn't even meet that very minimal requirement? and slow it down there sparky, i was talking about TE - and yes, you do need to have infrastructure and you're on a limited time frame to get it. I'm not going to waste time explaining low-tier (ooc: CNSE) military doctrine on here. I only discuss that with treaty partners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick GhostWolf Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I'm not going to waste time explaining low-tier (ooc: CNSE) military doctrine on here. I only discuss that with treaty partners. that, and it's completely irrelevant to most people. everyone knows you are hiding from those who want to curbstomp your nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Haha and hear I thought this would be another Merry Christmas thread... :facepalm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSoul Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 I rather like the sheep waiting to be told what nations to hit from a list provided by some random gov official. Sitting on an AA waiting for the annual war is the equivalent to rotting. Apathy wins and more people depart, then you get the horrific conditions of alliances who simply exsist for the formality of supposed online friendship. Its an anguish cycle that should be destroyed as soon as possible for the benefit of the world as a whole. It wont be of course but waxing poetic is about all thats left, 3 min of your life you will never get back. Says the one who, until recently, sat on an AA doing the exact same thing. But please, do explain to us how enlightened you are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samwise Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Haha and hear I thought this would be another Merry Christmas thread... :facepalm: Merry Christmas, and have a Happy New Year! *the OP does not speak on behalf of VE, and has since been removed from the AA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonewall14 Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Merry Christmas, and have a Happy New Year! *the OP does not speak on behalf of VE, and has since been removed from the AA. And Merry Christmas to you and yours... :awesome: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keelah Posted December 27, 2015 Report Share Posted December 27, 2015 Back on topic or warns will be handed out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Holton Posted December 27, 2015 Report Share Posted December 27, 2015 Merry Christmas, and have a Happy New Year! *the OP does not speak on behalf of VE, and has since been removed from the AA. Wow VE attacks our ally and we don't get reps? :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.