Jump to content
GeniusInc

To be named War Chart

Recommended Posts

Pedro's war for Argent Affection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like the last few wars, I'll be keeping a war chart and timeline of the war in the OP.

 

Edit: dang you are fast hartfw :P

Edited by GeniusInc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The War After Rey Got Peace from Argent is my favorite submission so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The War After Rey Got Peace from Argent (with Sengoku's help) is my favorite submission so far.

 

Lets not slight our role.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some metrics that this war chart hasn't caught onto. Such as

xnoZRdY.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only seven alliances versus one?

 

Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only seven alliances versus one?
 
Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup.


This is the best post the owf has seen in a long time. Wished I thought of it fist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only seven alliances versus one?
 
Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup.


Never know these guys might need the back up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only seven alliances versus one?
 
Smart holding back a couple of alliances - you never know with the 10+ to 1 advantage when you will require that backup.

You spread the damage out the thinnest, independent of the arithmetic of this war. Its a good policy to have for any grouping or sides, you tend to aim for maximum advantage. Despite all the hupla hoo of one sided wars etc, everyone shouting that or vice versa have always aimed for maximum advantage in the past at coalition levels. Winners and losers change, but coalitions always aim for maximum advantage, not equality. This was true in the past, it is true now and it will remain as such, everyone has shouted the war isn't equal argument, those attacking have done it, those getting attacked have done it too, so, in the end, it is what it is. The argument was stupid before, it is stupid now. Its merely an emotional outlet to satisfy your inner self that the big bad guy is on to you, and you're fighting the good under dog fight, and that if the big guy had the balls/honor/moral/whatever he'd come on to you in an equal fight, so you are fighting injustice and evil. Its just that, a silly line that is always associated mostly with smaller side, regardless of actors in the smaller side. Same actors have pressed for maximum advantage when they were in position of strength and actors in strength have shouted the equal war argument in the past too when they were in smaller sides. Edited by shahenshah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You spread the damage out the thinnest, independent of the arithmetic of this war. Its a good policy to have for any grouping or sides, you tend to aim for maximum advantage. Despite all the hupla hoo of one sided wars etc, everyone shouting that or vice versa have always aimed for maximum advantage in the past at coalition levels. Winners and losers change, but coalitions always aim for maximum advantage, not equality. This was true in the past, it is true now and it will remain as such, everyone has shouted the war isn't equal argument, those attacking have done it, those getting attacked have done it too, so, in the end, it is what it is. The argument was stupid before, it is stupid now. Its merely an emotional outlet to satisfy your inner self that the big bad guy is on to you, and you're fighting the good under dog fight, and that if the big guy had the balls/honor/moral/whatever he'd come on to you in an equal fight, so you are fighting injustice and evil. Its just that, a silly line that is always associated mostly with smaller side, regardless of actors in the smaller side. Same actors have pressed for maximum advantage when they were in position of strength and actors in strength have shouted the equal war argument in the past too when they were in smaller sides.


I think we can safely infer from this post that another 5 allainces will be declaring on Mi6 shortly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You spread the damage out the thinnest, independent of the arithmetic of this war. Its a good policy to have for any grouping or sides, you tend to aim for maximum advantage. Despite all the hupla hoo of one sided wars etc, everyone shouting that or vice versa have always aimed for maximum advantage in the past at coalition levels. Winners and losers change, but coalitions always aim for maximum advantage, not equality. This was true in the past, it is true now and it will remain as such, everyone has shouted the war isn't equal argument, those attacking have done it, those getting attacked have done it too, so, in the end, it is what it is. The argument was stupid before, it is stupid now. Its merely an emotional outlet to satisfy your inner self that the big bad guy is on to you, and you're fighting the good under dog fight, and that if the big guy had the balls/honor/moral/whatever he'd come on to you in an equal fight, so you are fighting injustice and evil. Its just that, a silly line that is always associated mostly with smaller side, regardless of actors in the smaller side. Same actors have pressed for maximum advantage when they were in position of strength and actors in strength have shouted the equal war argument in the past too when they were in smaller sides.

 

While this may be true, it has been a long time since we seen 7+ alliances against a single alliance. Not since the last time NPO led a bloc actually. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you think we're leading this bloc?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you think we're leading this bloc?


NPO leading anything would shock me. Last war you guys were the alliance that took orders. All that NS that tech, aid slot % and just slaves to others

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...