Starfox101 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 We've destroyed SUN. Invicta is next on the X-Men hit list. It started with SUN, and best believe, it will end with you Invicta. So intense Kashmir has 11 nations over 20k. SUN has 34. You got some work yet kiddo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Conrad Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Yes, but ours can actually fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Yes, but ours can actually fight. Starfox just dislikes loki, you should let the two of them duke it out, gonna be great Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Yes, but ours can actually fight. Don't be fooled by a blitz, however admirably coordinated it was. However, we are flattered you seem to have such a fixation on us...we're feeling the love. :wub: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Layton Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 I think you need to actually be winning before you can start bragging. Perhaps when your nations do more than lob four cruise missiles at me and then give up, I can concede that SUN is actually trying to fight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Must be fighting the inevitable chaff before the breeze. Ask Haflinger what he thinks about glowing green presents I left for him. B-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 (edited) OK, I will then. http://www.cybernations.net/war_information.asp?ID=770876 :. War Details About Wars War Status: War Expired War Reason: Fenris is here War Declaration Date: 11/18/2014 10:24:25 PM War End Date: 11/26/2014 Total Attacks: 130 XP Option: Experience Enabled War Declared By War Declared On Nation Name: Llonach The Forgotten Ones Ruler Name: Haflinger Subtleknifewielder Alliance: The JavaHouse League State Of Unified Nations Soldiers Lost: 504,026 271,629 Tanks Lost: 46,730 34,690 Cruise Missiles Lost: 0 0 Aircraft Lost: 675 536 Navy Lost: 42 35 Infrastructure Lost: 1,059.23 2,349.13 Technology Lost: 749.74 1,031.68 Land Lost: 1,062.195 3,064.505 Land/Tech/Infra: 8,519.66 Strength Lost 16,802.53 Strength Lost Destruction Rank: This war was more destructive than 3,257 of 3,420 existing wars. EDIT: Well, that pasted horribly. The point is he won. Edited November 26, 2014 by Max Power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Shabazz Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Hi there. Who's destroyed again? :ehm: You have sixty-something nations, and last time I checked, 53 are in anarchy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Shabazz Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 So intense Kashmir has 11 nations over 20k. SUN has 34. You got some work yet kiddo And they still suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Boris Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 You have sixty-something nations, and last time I checked, 53 are in anarchy. Trying to use anarchy stats as a benchmark of success is generally moronic and you should feel bad for using it. Since the paradigm shift in war to the stance of nuking all the time, every time, you're doing something pretty damn wrong if you're not putting people into anarchy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Shabazz Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Trying to use anarchy stats as a benchmark of success is generally moronic and you should feel bad for using it. Since the paradigm shift in war to the stance of nuking all the time, every time, you're doing something pretty damn wrong if you're not putting people into anarchy. They're not winning. Get over it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Trying to use anarchy stats as a benchmark of success is generally moronic and you should feel bad for using it. Since the paradigm shift in war to the stance of nuking all the time, every time, you're doing something pretty damn wrong if you're not putting people into anarchy. True in most cases. I assume he picked up the metric when we mentioned we anarchied about half of SUN on the first day, before nukes. But w/e, carry on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Kashmir vs. SUN 1v1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 starfox vs. oya 1v1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 starfox vs. oya 1v1 That escalated fast The idea I would even have a nation that large is preposterous sir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 That escalated fastThe idea I would even have a nation that large is preposterous sir Heh yeah I know. Just making the point that were that fight possible, you would be at a significant disadvantage just as we would be 1v1 with SUN. I get your point that we have made a certain amount of noise about our performance, the reason though is not that we think we're beating them by ourselves, the efforts of others on this front are obviously indispensable. Conversely it springs from the fact that are we significantly smaller than SUN and yet have performed quite well thus far. It is a subjective pride rising from our relative size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurthwaite Posted November 26, 2014 Report Share Posted November 26, 2014 Conversely it springs from the fact that are we significantly smaller than SUN and yet have performed quite well thus far. It is a subjective pride rising from our relative size. o/micros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 Heh yeah I know. Just making the point that were that fight possible, you would be at a significant disadvantage just as we would be 1v1 with SUN. I get your point that we have made a certain amount of noise about our performance, the reason though is not that we think we're beating them by ourselves, the efforts of others on this front are obviously indispensable. Conversely it springs from the fact that are we significantly smaller than SUN and yet have performed quite well thus far. It is a subjective pride rising from our relative size. Honestly it's just Loki. You have this dude in here acting as if he is DBDC himself. Kashmir is cool in my book still though for the most part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 We wouldnt be here today without Loki's month-old nation hello! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted November 28, 2014 Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 Yes we're prideful, so what. Not like it isn't justified. We're not overly bothered for that matter that it ruffles feathers or that it results in !@#$%* comics. A true 1v1? 45 Kashmir members, 1 million NS vs 45 SUN members, 1 million NS? Hah! But that's not what we got and there's no underselling tJL's and AI's contributions. We're prideful but not unappreciative. Ultimately we must be doing something right if Invicta, overwhelmed as they are, had to enter on this front and bring in the paper tigers with them. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Layton Posted November 30, 2014 Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 Yes we're prideful, so what. Not like it isn't justified. We're not overly bothered for that matter that it ruffles feathers or that it results in !@#$%* comics. A true 1v1? 45 Kashmir members, 1 million NS vs 45 SUN members, 1 million NS? Hah! But that's not what we got and there's no underselling tJL's and AI's contributions. We're prideful but not unappreciative. Ultimately we must be doing something right if Invicta, overwhelmed as they are, had to enter on this front and bring in the paper tigers with them. :) Well, I mean two Kashmiri plus a tiny ass micro like LN can defeat the GOONS lower tier and that's with all the GOONS receiving full aid slots every ten days and us receiving nothing. And I can post PMs too to show just how helpless they were. I shudder to think about what 50 Kashmiri can do with the help of all her allies. May the Lord have mercy on our enemies because we sure won't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted November 30, 2014 Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 I'm still unsure if this is Boyle or not ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik Shabazz Posted November 30, 2014 Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 Well, I mean two Kashmiri plus a tiny ass micro like LN can defeat the GOONS lower tier and that's with all the GOONS receiving full aid slots every ten days and us receiving nothing. And I can post PMs too to show just how helpless they were. I shudder to think about what 50 Kashmiri can do with the help of all her allies. May the Lord have mercy on our enemies because we sure won't. I took on GOONS entire lower-tier by myself until they sanctioned me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrash Posted November 30, 2014 Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 Ultimately we must be doing something right if Invicta, overwhelmed as they are, had to enter on this front and bring in the paper tigers with them. :) 1 defensive war this entire time, on the initial DS blitz. Not overwhelmed here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted December 1, 2014 Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 1 defensive war this entire time, on the initial DS blitz. Not overwhelmed here. If only all of Invicta could say the same. :ehm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.