Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Third King

Cordiality: Days of Future Past

Recommended Posts

Surely we won't see any stupid Lobster Party references in this thread. Oh, what's that? $%&@ off? Ok then.

Congrats on a game-changing treaty between two alliances who have either given up on game-changing or don't know how to do it.

 

The days of game changing are over. It is no more the fault of either of the 2 alliances than it is of the over 200+ alliances. What this is, is practical, and more clearly spells out what the future holds (at least in regards to the next war, if the trend continues, it will all change again before the subsequent one, we may never see a sphere win 2 in a row while at the pinnacle again.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The days of game changing are over. It is no more the fault of either of the 2 alliances than it is of the over 200+ alliances. What this is, is practical, and more clearly spells out what the future holds (at least in regards to the next war, if the trend continues, it will all change again before the subsequent one, we may never see a sphere win 2 in a row while at the pinnacle again.)

I'm not sold on this being a big deal at all. I'm not sold on it being the smartest thing. In fact, I'm almost sure that the more treaties with IRON a sphere has, the more likely it is that IRON attacks that particular sphere.

OOC: I wasn't referencing the actual meta-game, but the fact that people are pretending this is a big deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like you have to let the thread reach a dozen pages and have damage control done by bigger players before "a big deal" can be said to be being made of this.

'grats NPO, IRON.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About time this happened.

 

Gratz both of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You say NAP but I smell oDoAP. 

 

Letum's right; it isn't exactly hidden. And the original Cordiality Accords had an optional military clause in them as well. They were just signed in early 2007 before the names of treaties were standardized. ;)

 

 

Either way,

o/ IRON

o/ Pacifica

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This makes me feel all warm and fuzzy... oh wait, that's just radiation.

Things just getting back to normal. Move along, there's nothing to see here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lobster party's puppeteering bearing fruit. We welcome Letum into the fold.

 

Indeed. The reach of the great power grows.

Edited by Montosh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't wait for someone to test out the new and fully operational cordiality accords


The point is you surely felt the same way about the Forge Accords. Maintaining (as you are) or reestablishing (as NPO just did) ties with an alliance that crows about its stats which are a product of leaving allies out to dry reeks of desperation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point is you surely felt the same way about the Forge Accords. Maintaining (as you are) or reestablishing (as NPO just did) ties with an alliance that crows about its stats which are a product of leaving allies out to dry reeks of desperation.

There's also the fact that it wasn't even a year ago that IRON cut NPO because "their interests didn't align"

ie, NPO had to fight upper tier alliances with the edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also the fact that it wasn't even a year ago that IRON cut NPO because "their interests didn't align"

ie, NPO had to fight upper tier alliances with the edge.

give me whatever you're smoking please

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But... but... NPO was supposed to sign with TOP to roll IRON!

 

Congrats you 2. Make it right this time.

We can do better Rush. Shady Business II. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...