Rush Sykes Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Surely we won't see any stupid Lobster Party references in this thread. Oh, what's that? $%&@ off? Ok then. Congrats on a game-changing treaty between two alliances who have either given up on game-changing or don't know how to do it. The days of game changing are over. It is no more the fault of either of the 2 alliances than it is of the over 200+ alliances. What this is, is practical, and more clearly spells out what the future holds (at least in regards to the next war, if the trend continues, it will all change again before the subsequent one, we may never see a sphere win 2 in a row while at the pinnacle again.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 The days of game changing are over. It is no more the fault of either of the 2 alliances than it is of the over 200+ alliances. What this is, is practical, and more clearly spells out what the future holds (at least in regards to the next war, if the trend continues, it will all change again before the subsequent one, we may never see a sphere win 2 in a row while at the pinnacle again.)I'm not sold on this being a big deal at all. I'm not sold on it being the smartest thing. In fact, I'm almost sure that the more treaties with IRON a sphere has, the more likely it is that IRON attacks that particular sphere.OOC: I wasn't referencing the actual meta-game, but the fact that people are pretending this is a big deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkfox Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 The lessons of the past have not been learnt, and thus history will repeat itself... Only 3 more times apparently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 I feel like you have to let the thread reach a dozen pages and have damage control done by bigger players before "a big deal" can be said to be being made of this.'grats NPO, IRON. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Lobster party's puppeteering bearing fruit. We welcome Letum into the fold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Spanier Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 It's not exactly hidden. Well that's certainly news to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSoul Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Looks good, congrats folks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3mon Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 About time this happened. Gratz both of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edward I Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 You say NAP but I smell oDoAP. Letum's right; it isn't exactly hidden. And the original Cordiality Accords had an optional military clause in them as well. They were just signed in early 2007 before the names of treaties were standardized. ;) Either way, o/ IRON o/ Pacifica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeology Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 congrats IRON and NPO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lysistrata Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 This makes me feel all warm and fuzzy... oh wait, that's just radiation. Things just getting back to normal. Move along, there's nothing to see here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caladin Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Hail IRON! Hail Pacifica! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Three guesses how this is ending,... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Three guesses how this is ending,... Does it involve babies on spits? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Nahhh forget about it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Does it involve babies on spits? My Sunday? Hope not, its my off day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montosh Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 (edited) Lobster party's puppeteering bearing fruit. We welcome Letum into the fold. Indeed. The reach of the great power grows. Edited October 11, 2014 by Montosh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcrews Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Very nice to see. Congrats you two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muffasamini Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Does it involve babies on spits? We like to call it Korean BBQ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan100 Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Glad to see this posted o/ IRON o/ Pacifica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 I suspect that people begun to be nostalgic about cyberverse politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 Can't wait for someone to test out the new and fully operational cordiality accords The point is you surely felt the same way about the Forge Accords. Maintaining (as you are) or reestablishing (as NPO just did) ties with an alliance that crows about its stats which are a product of leaving allies out to dry reeks of desperation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 The point is you surely felt the same way about the Forge Accords. Maintaining (as you are) or reestablishing (as NPO just did) ties with an alliance that crows about its stats which are a product of leaving allies out to dry reeks of desperation.There's also the fact that it wasn't even a year ago that IRON cut NPO because "their interests didn't align"ie, NPO had to fight upper tier alliances with the edge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samus Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 There's also the fact that it wasn't even a year ago that IRON cut NPO because "their interests didn't align" ie, NPO had to fight upper tier alliances with the edge. give me whatever you're smoking please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltus Posted October 11, 2014 Report Share Posted October 11, 2014 But... but... NPO was supposed to sign with TOP to roll IRON! Congrats you 2. Make it right this time. We can do better Rush. Shady Business II. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.