Beauty Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 So far Pax Corvus has shown their not weak pussies to be rolled over, but for the sake of because I want to and am not sober, which neutral will be the next DBDC raid target most likely and what not? The only factors I can see if that DBDC will absolutely not raid WTF and GPA if they think GPA and WTF will fight back. They obviously won't fight OBR because Cuba would be butt rolled by Dulra so that's not even an option. Other than that there are a few where DBDC could come out on top without facing repercussions so who will they be? Vote above and whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krihelion Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 So far Pax Corvus has shown their not weak !@#$%*^ to be rolled over, but for the sake of because I want to and am not sober, which neutral will be the next DBDC raid target most likely and what not? The only factors I can see if that DBDC will absolutely not raid WTF and GPA if they think GPA and WTF will fight back. They obviously won't fight OBR because Cuba would be butt rolled by Dulra so that's not even an option. Other than that there are a few where DBDC could come out on top without facing repercussions so who will they be? Vote above and whatever. How can do you call 1 million NS loss to NS gain from DBDC not being rolled. We all know why Dulra won't get attacked, and its not because of the tech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groucho Marx Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 How can do you call 1 million NS loss to NS gain from DBDC not being rolled. We all know why Dulra won't get attacked, and its not because of the tech. If I get your reference right, yeah no kidding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted August 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 How can do you call 1 million NS loss to NS gain from DBDC not being rolled. We all know why Dulra won't get attacked, and its not because of the tech. Ok ok ok, it's because of the tech Cuba and DBDC would lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samwise Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 (edited) I voted for Grand Ole Party because I don't know who they are, and I think I want to. :ehm: Edited August 4, 2014 by Samwise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted August 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 I voted for Grand Ole Party because I don't know who they are, and I think I want to. :ehm: ;) Get em sammie sam :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 Dbdc did this war to open up more targets for them to attack. they won't limit themselves on neutrals. Once PC changes the top 250 nation layout they'll switch to a new target Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBRaiders Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 I voted someone else. Hope I am right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saladjoe Posted August 4, 2014 Report Share Posted August 4, 2014 Voted for backwards elevator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubaQuerida Posted August 5, 2014 Report Share Posted August 5, 2014 (edited) I'm still voting for Timmehhh (Or Oyababy if he doesn't drop under 30k infra) Edited August 5, 2014 by CubaQuerida Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2BKs Posted August 5, 2014 Report Share Posted August 5, 2014 You should've included an All The Above option Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garbunkel Posted August 5, 2014 Report Share Posted August 5, 2014 I'm going to vote for Pax...oh wait... :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tayloj7 Posted August 5, 2014 Report Share Posted August 5, 2014 what? no all of the above option? :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted August 5, 2014 Report Share Posted August 5, 2014 If the neutrals knew what was good for them, they'd sign paper recognizing and guaranteeing each other's neutrality. As is, it doesn't matter who the next target is, since they are all just being picked off as boredom allows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Buscemi Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 How can do you call 1 million NS loss to NS gain from DBDC not being rolled. We all know why Dulra can't get attacked, and its not because of the tech. Edited for clarity. :smug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 If the neutrals knew what was good for them, they'd sign paper recognizing and guaranteeing each other's neutrality. As is, it doesn't matter who the next target is, since they are all just being picked off as boredom allows. If they guarantee each others nuetrality then they guarantee they'll stay neutral when each other is rolled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helbrecht Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 Looks like it is to be jerdge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artigo Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 Looks like it is to be jerdge. Gaela is a peaceful nation. War is not an option since 8/5/2014. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelH43ID Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 Gaela is a peaceful nation. War is not an option since 8/5/2014. But let's not pretend this didn't happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 If they guarantee each others nuetrality then they guarantee they'll stay neutral when each other is rolled. No, it would mean that if you tried to roll one, the others would come to their defense, just as the nations within a neutral alliance defend each other. It has been done before actually, though typically the alliance making the guarantee wasn't another neutral. Neutral doesn't mean no treaties, ever. GPA and OBR signed treaties with other alliances in the past in order to have their neutrality recognized. Neutrality as we knew it is dead. That doesn't mean that neutral alliances have to wade into the pig pen of the treaty web however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prodigal Moon Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 No, it would mean that if you tried to roll one, the others would come to their defense, just as the nations within a neutral alliance defend each other. That was the argument I tried to make to some of them. Alliances are by definition a collective of nations defending each other, typically predicated on mutual adherence to a shared set of rules for conduct (charter). If different neutral AA's could establish agreement upon the code of conduct that warrants protection of their nations, then what difference would it make which AA they reside on? Nations within an alliance aren't neutral with respect to one another, they just choose to draw the line only around their particular AA instead of considering whether they could also draw that line around another (otherwise) neutral AA. Too bad they didn't go for it, or we would've rolled out 50 mil NS deep back when TDO got hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o ya baby Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 But let's not pretend this didn't happen. It did. So what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imperator Honorius Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 But let's not pretend this didn't happen.We're discussing this with the leadership of DBDC. We'll keep you all posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted August 6, 2014 Report Share Posted August 6, 2014 That was the argument I tried to make to some of them. Alliances are by definition a collective of nations defending each other, typically predicated on mutual adherence to a shared set of rules for conduct (charter). If different neutral AA's could establish agreement upon the code of conduct that warrants protection of their nations, then what difference would it make which AA they reside on? Nations within an alliance aren't neutral with respect to one another, they just choose to draw the line only around their particular AA instead of considering whether they could also draw that line around another (otherwise) neutral AA. Too bad they didn't go for it, or we would've rolled out 50 mil NS deep back when TDO got hit. They're scared if they did that they'd be more zealously targetted, and they may be right.. and they can't afford to be targetted because Infra > Everything to the neutrals. They will only fight to defend their own Infra. They care about nothing else. They will never lift a finger to help anyone else, not even a brother in neutrality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted August 7, 2014 Report Share Posted August 7, 2014 We're discussing this with the leadership of DBDC. We'll keep you all posted. Will be that before or after their second raid on GPA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.