dunhill2071 Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 I was looking at the crime index formula and I was wondering why isn't land in the equation? As it stands now the more infra you buy the more crime you'll have but shouldn't land IE population per mile determine that instead of straight population? The more spread out people are the less crime there will be... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted July 17, 2014 Report Share Posted July 17, 2014 There was some discussion on including land at the time, but there was a debate as to whether this would unfairly punish smaller nations (who have more important things to spend their small cash reserves on than land, and also because of their smaller amount of natural land growth). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dunhill2071 Posted July 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2014 (edited) Well smaller nations have low infra and thus land. Make it work off a system based on population density. Like between 0-25 26-50 and so on. I would love to purchase land but it seems to do so little at the moment. Currently my land strenght is only 2% of my NS, that is very disproportional; shouldn't land be more important? Edited July 18, 2014 by dunhill2071 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syracuse Posted July 18, 2014 Report Share Posted July 18, 2014 This is not a question. If you want to suggest it, please use the suggestion box.iLock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts