Jump to content

FARK in violation of treaty?


Opaque
 Share

Recommended Posts

According to a thread on their own forums, FARK possess an NAP with NATO.

 

And as we all know, FARK, as a part of XX, declared on NATO two days ago.

 

More evidence of treaty here.

 

So my question is this: do six year old treaties still matter, or is this a non-issue? Is a treaty a treaty? Are NAPs, even if they are active, irrelevant in the era of coalition warfare? What are your thoughts on this matter, Planet Bob?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloc treaties generally overrule NAP treaties-probably the main reason those treaties stop existing was people began to regard treaties as having a hierarchy, therefore they don't have to follow NAP when they have an MDP. 

 

Or more likely the relevant parties forgot it really existed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This didn't stop Fark from declaring on NATO in PB-NpO War. Imma guess it's just bad paperwork and probably got canceled ages ago back when dumping tons of NAP's was the *in* thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FARK has always been very big on Aqua unity and FARK, MHA, and NATO were in an MADP bloc called Trident for a very long time. Also, the three alliances were also signatories of several Aqua unity treaties back in the day. NATO's on Blue now and does not list that treaty on its forums so I'm assuming that this is just bad record keeping.

Edited by Monroe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Trident very well.

 

At least MHA and Fark have remained the same sort of. NATO kind of went Continuum to Hegemony Loyalist to Blue NATO to kind-of-quiet NATO.

 

It's sad how friendships change though. :( Never would have even suspected this in 2008.

 

Also I am pretty sure this was cancelled when NATO had to cancel all of it's treaties post-karma or some other time in quiet. I don't know, but I doubt it's still in effect.

Edited by Rotavele
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NATO are a good bunch, I know they caught a lot of shit for the RoK debacle, so I am  biased.. but so what...

 

I have many friends in FARK as well...I can only say, "Well duh. NAP vs. anything else?"..

 

Aqua love never left the launch-pad and NATO has always been tightest with NPO...it is what it is. Move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declaration 4 ? /unless it isn?t

This agreement becomes a worthless peace of ones and zeros if any signatory fingers get aggressively put into the collective arses of alliances that either signatory alliance has defense treaties with.

 

As NATO has, in the past, declared aggressively on our allies, as I'm fairly sure we've done to them, this treaty is not currently active.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Trident very well.

 

At least MHA and Fark have remained the same sort of. NATO kind of went Continuum to Hegemony Loyalist to Blue NATO to kind-of-quiet NATO.

 

It's sad how friendships change though. :( Never would have even suspected this in 2008.

 

Also I am pretty sure this was cancelled when NATO had to cancel all of it's treaties post-karma or some other time in quiet. I don't know, but I doubt it's still in effect.

I'm sure if you asked NATO, they'd say that Aqua changed and they didn't feel comfortable there anymore, so they moved to Blue where they felt they'd be more welcome.  

 

Also, MHA was in Continuum too and was treatied to NPO for a very long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure if you asked NATO, they'd say that Aqua changed and they didn't feel comfortable there anymore, so they moved to Blue where they felt they'd be more welcome.  

 

Also, MHA was in Continuum too and was treatied to NPO for a very long time.

 

Yes but we are talking about NATO not MHA. Also aren't NATO still allied to NPO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we are talking about NATO not MHA. Also aren't NATO still allied to NPO?

You're the one that implied that NATO had somehow changed, I was merely responding that it takes two people to break a relationship. I have a feeling that if you asked them, NATO would say that Aqua, including Fark and MHA, left them.

To address the initial point, Fark are one of the most independent and straight shooting alliances out there. They are extremely careful of the treaties that they sign and I don't believe that they would wantonly violate them. Most likely, this a paperwork error. Edited by Monroe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We aren't attacking NATO aggressively, so this treaty hasn't been violated.

We are tying cute little ribbons to all of our nukes before firing them.
We're also dropping hundreds of teddy bears along with our carpet bombing.

See? We're attacking them lovingly. Think Ike Turner, we just love them so much it hurts (them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...