IYIyTh Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I don't know but according to Berbers if those imbeciles in the winning coalition don't wise up soon they may very well win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Oh golly. TOP started a war based on a realistic chance of winning? What is this witchcraft?! Well, here's the rub, they didn't just start a war based on a realistic change of winning, they started one where everyone but them takes a shit-ton of damage :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I don't know but according to Berbers if those imbeciles in the winning coalition don't wise up soon they may very well win. There's charlie sheen winning and real winning. If TOP comes out with their normal 10-15% damage while their coalition mates take 25-30%, then TOP won more than others, won't you say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alyster Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Well, here's the rub, they didn't just start a war based on a realistic change of winning, they started one where everyone but them takes a !@#$-ton of damage :P You can change it. Bring more of your top tier out to play and inflict the damage up on us. Dear berbers, save TOP's reputation! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 You can change it. Bring more of your top tier out to play and inflict the damage up on us. Dear berbers, save TOP's reputation! Do we even have a top tier anymore? :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Do we even have a top tier anymore? :P You have 8 nations above 100k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the rebel Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I do find it humourous that some of the very same people who were slagging off IRON in this conflict are now using the "you won't hit TIO because of IRON" as a goad. Well, here's the rub, they didn't just start a war based on a realistic change of winning, they started one where everyone but them takes a !@#$-ton of damage :P So NPO and NG who declared on them and the alliances TOP have declared on wasn't enough to do a shit-ton of damage to TOP :blink: I don't know what you're trying to imply here, is it that TOP are gods of war or your coalition is concentrating its forces in the wrong places? Either way I'm sure the fresh forces at RnR could declare on them to stop your lame propaganda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShamWOW Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Pillage their villages. Slaughter their daughters. Leave nothing standing. o/ TOP/UMB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) Well, here's the rub, they didn't just start a war based on a realistic change of winning, they started one where everyone but them takes a !@#$-ton of damage :P Funny, as Polar would tell you that it was they who started the war. The only true question for me right now is why I'm bothering to respond to you. Probably it's because I feel sorry for you (and not in a good way). Edited December 14, 2013 by Crymson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted December 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 huh? Man your brain goes off into some weird tangents sometimes... My whole response to SB was that I agreed with him that TOP were worried about IRON so chose an easier target, which is their Modus Operandi. I don't think it was planned from the start, I think the way the war panned out caused a decision tree type situation within TOP, and as always, they chose the branch with the least risk and damage. Are you implying NATO is even more incompetent than TIO? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Funny, as Polar would tell you that it was they who started the war. The only true question for me right now is why I'm bothering to respond to you. Probably it's because I feel sorry for you (and not in a good way). Yeah TOP had nothing to do with the planning and execution of this war I am sure :/ Carry on feeling sorry for me, I feel sorry for anyone stuck fighting alongside you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Are you implying NATO is even more incompetent than TIO? TIO has allies that might take exception to hitting them, whereas NATO's allies are all at war on this side, under peace terms or most likely about to fight on the same side. The risk I refer to is pissing off TIO's MDoAP allies, listed here for your comprehension: LoSS, MCXA, IRON Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Centurius Posted December 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 TIO has allies that might take exception to hitting them, whereas NATO's allies are all at war on this side, under peace terms or most likely about to fight on the same side. The risk I refer to is pissing off TIO's MDoAP allies, listed here for your comprehension: LoSS, MCXA, IRON But your entire coalition made a point of shaming them for not defending MD allies. You can't have the cake and eat it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) But your entire coalition made a point of shaming them for not defending MD allies. You can't have the cake and eat it. WTF are you talking about?! I am describing two circumstances, one is hitting NATO whose allies are all fully invested already on the losing side, or hitting TIO who still has multiple allies that are not and in a position to do something if they get pissed off enough. How can you say one option is not less risky than the other? I'm not saying I believe TIO's allies are going to do anything about it, but the risk is there they could, which inherently makes TIO the riskier target. Unless you somehow think I am saying their allies should do something about it, which is not even remotely the point I am arguing. Edited December 14, 2013 by berbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 You can't have the cake and eat it. I don't think that berbers is intelligent enough to appreciate concepts of that sort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSoul Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 The amount of arrogance in this thread is palpable. I change my nomination for largest e-peen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 There's charlie sheen winning and real winning. If TOP comes out with their normal 10-15% damage while their coalition mates take 25-30%, then TOP won more than others, won't you say? There, there. I'd be jealous too if my coalition didn't have a few AAs destroying all the top tier nations on the other coalition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 There, there. I'd be jealous too if my coalition didn't have a few AAs destroying all the top tier nations on the other coalition. I must be posting gibberish because every response I get has nothing to do with what I was saying... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 The amount of arrogance in this thread is palpable. I change my nomination for largest e-peen. No one has a bigger e-peen than sengoku. No one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 No one has a bigger e-peen than sengoku. No one.seriously, do not even try. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 There, there. I'd be jealous too if my coalition didn't have a few AAs destroying all the top tier nations on the other coalition. to be fair they do have DBDC. The amount of arrogance in this thread is palpable. I change my nomination for largest e-peen. any thread I post in brings out the best in people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) Just got my money from winning the bet with TOP from NG who is paying Polar to send it. Feeling good. #SwaggingToTheBank #ThanksCenturius Edited December 14, 2013 by Rotavele Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Lord of Funk Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I must be posting gibberish because every response I get has nothing to do with what I was saying... I agree that Hitler was a fabulous decorator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingervites Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) When measuring the collective size of Sengoku's epeen, one finds that Auctor makes up only .034% Edited December 14, 2013 by Gingervites Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 When measuring the collective size of Sengoku's epeen, one finds that Auctor makes up only .034%you told me size doesn't matter! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.