commanderragnar Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 I lol'd, have fun getting slaughtered LoSS, it's about all you're good for, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyt2k Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Just in case anyone is confused, as many are, it goes: MI6 - oDoAP - NPL - oDoAP - LoSS - MnDoAP - MCXA - MDoAP - NADC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moufassa Posted November 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Just in case anyone is confused, as many are, it goes: MI6 - oDoAP - NPL - oDoAP - LoSS - MnDoAP - MCXA - MDoAP - NADC Yes sir. Looks like there are some tight friendships in those treaties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 another front LoSS? :awesome: I think the other front peaced out. o/ LoSS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevolutionaryRebel Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Hey, if we have you countered, will IRON get off it's rump and do something? IRON? Doing something? Why would that ever happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 (edited) IRON? Doing something? Why would that ever happen? >Does some of the hardest fighting in the previous war >Gets called lazy by a micro Edited November 12, 2013 by Commander shepard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Winters Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Yarly, I got to help beat down Gibs in that war. That was awesome. Good times, that war. I got to land 8 nukes on Gibs. 3 days in a row with the 1 nuke I was able to buy for the day. His SDI was govno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Yes sir. Looks like there are some tight friendships in those treaties. The only thing tight there would be the strings between puppets and puppet master. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Just in case anyone is confused, as many are, it goes: MI6 - oDoAP - NPL - oDoAP - LoSS - MnDoAP - MCXA - MDoAP - NADC I love how this keeps getting brought up as if it actually fucking matters. You, memoryproblems, and probably others have some weird hard-on over this. You realize that optional treaties are just as valid for entry into war as mutual treaties correct? If not, well that is your issue and I don't give a fuck. If you know, then shut the fuck up about it. Go cry somewhere else. You realize NG and NPO burnt through most of their political capital last war and this is the result of it. Just because TIO does not have the balls to do shit about anything, does not mean others will simply allow others to guide their alliance forever right? Good times, that war. I got to land 8 nukes on Gibs. 3 days in a row with the 1 nuke I was able to buy for the day. His SDI was govno. Hahahaha. Well this time around I am on the same side of Gibs, which is weird and kind of gives me the willies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoMercy Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Yes sir. Looks like there are some tight friendships in those treaties. It's called bailing out, not friendship. ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 The only thing tight there would be the strings between puppets and puppet master. Need to check you own back before checking others mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 I love how this keeps getting brought up as if it actually fucking matters. You, memoryproblems, and probably others have some weird hard-on over this. You realize that optional treaties are just as valid for entry into war as mutual treaties correct? If not, well that is your issue and I don't give a fuck. If you know, then shut the fuck up about it. Go cry somewhere else. You realize NG and NPO burnt through most of their political capital last war and this is the result of it. Just because TIO does not have the balls to do shit about anything, does not mean others will simply allow others to guide their alliance forever right? Hahahaha. Well this time around I am on the same side of Gibs, which is weird and kind of gives me the willies. Honestly, what we're doing takes more balls than just bailing on treaty partners to go join the winning side ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 I love how this keeps getting brought up as if it actually fucking matters. You, memoryproblems, and probably others have some weird hard-on over this. You realize that optional treaties are just as valid for entry into war as mutual treaties correct? If not, well that is your issue and I don't give a fuck. If you know, then shut the fuck up about it. Go cry somewhere else. And for some reason you have a problem with AE with their valid entry into a subsection of this war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Need to check you own back before checking others mate. /me looks.. I see noone there mate. As you might see for yourself if you look at all those counter we are enduring.. oh wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Honestly, what we're doing takes more balls than just bailing on treaty partners to go join the winning side ;) So, they follow treaties to join a war on the other side and you claim they are bailing? Again, your ally NPO burnt and shit on a lot of folks on this side of the war during eQ. Hell for that matter, they pretty much shit all over their own allies during that war. NG shit on a lot of people on this side of the war. NG for that matter tried to build a coalition to fight some alliances on this side. Bailing no. More like alliances not want to defend two alliances that have done nothing but shit and use them. It is called not allowing puppet strings to be attached mate. Be a good ally, DDL, that is fine. But don't claim people are bailing because they refuse to defend the likes of NPO and NG. Just cuz Steve stepped in and said some things, does not change all the shit NG has done. Actions have consequences and the amount of fucking whining coming from your side is hilarious. How did TIO enter eQ? Wasn't it on an oA of an MD? Yeah, funny how when TIO chains into a war, it is all good to go. Others, not so much. So can we please shut the fuck up about entries into wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 (edited) So can we please shut the fuck up about entries into wars. Make me? :P Please dont ghost DoW on us. :popcorn: Edited November 12, 2013 by Da DreadLord Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 And for some reason you have a problem with AE with their valid entry into a subsection of this war. Valid? Aren't they a protectorate of TPF who is hitting a small alliance that hit NPO? One that TPF has not hit. So, AE has no treaty ties to NPO and yet is defending NPO without even a ghost DoW from TPF to make it valid. Seriously, you say some of the dumbest shit sometimes but wow, this statement lacks any sort of fact-checking or research. /me looks.. I see noone there mate. As you might see for yourself if you look at all those counter we are enduring.. oh wait umm... wtf does counters have to do with anything? In fact, I was talking about checking your back for puppet strings and you are discussing gettin hit from behind. Two entirely different subjects mate. Should read the post of yours that I quoted instead of replying for the sake of replying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Make me? :P Please dont ghost DoW on us. :popcorn: <3 you DDL. Just tired of people saying stupid shit about idiotic things. So lets move on to other stuff. o/ LoSS welcome to the fight. Have fun fighting both NoR and TPF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 umm... wtf does counters have to do with anything? In fact, I was talking about checking your back for puppet strings and you are discussing gettin hit from behind. Two entirely different subjects mate. Should read the post of yours that I quoted instead of replying for the sake of replying. Cause puppets take targets and damage. If TIO was a puppet we'd be taking more than sparta lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Valid? Aren't they a protectorate of TPF who is hitting a small alliance that hit NPO? One that TPF has not hit. So, AE has no treaty ties to NPO and yet is defending NPO without even a ghost DoW from TPF to make it valid. Seriously, you say some of the dumbest shit sometimes but wow, this statement lacks any sort of fact-checking or research. Are you saying that the current global war is invalid? And no I did not say it was a valid treaty chain, don't know why you're having a go at your own idiocy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Cause puppets take targets and damage. If TIO was a puppet we'd be taking more than sparta lol. You realize Sparta is doing more damage to you than you are to them. You pretty much aren't worth the effort of hitting. I mean, if not for NATO, y'all would probably be far worse off. Are you saying that the current global war is invalid? And no I did not say it was a valid treaty chain, don't know why you're having a go at your own idiocy. wtf are your blathering on about? You said that AE had a valid entry, I showed you they did not. Now you talk about the global war being invalid? A valid entry is via a treaty, whether mutual or optional. Neither of which exist between NPO and AE. Read your own damn post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da DreadLord Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 (edited) You realize Sparta is doing more damage to you than you are to them. You pretty much aren't worth the effort of hitting. I mean, if not for NATO, y'all would probably be far worse off. Top 7 Day Smallest Alliance Gains 3) -1,272,825 Strength Change - Sparta Okaaaaay... Edited November 12, 2013 by Da DreadLord Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 wtf are your blathering on about? You said that AE had a valid entry, I showed you they did not. Now you talk about the global war being invalid? A valid entry is via a treaty, whether mutual or optional. Neither of which exist between NPO and AE. Read your own damn post. Yeah they had a valid entry, you interpreted that as me saying they had a valid treaty chain. Valid is not a word with a definition that implies it can only be valid if it used in conjunction with a treaty. Evidently pieces of crap can use treaties to enter a war, I would not call them entries valid by definition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Top 7 Day Smallest Alliance Gains 3) -1,272,825 Strength Change - Sparta Okaaaaay... Most coming from NPO and NATO mate. That much is also easy to see. Yeah they had a valid entry, you interpreted that as me saying they had a valid treaty chain. Valid is not a word with a definition that implies it can only be valid if it used in conjunction with a treaty. Evidently pieces of crap can use treaties to enter a war, I would not call them entries valid by definition. Without any treaty with NPO or ghost DoW from TPF, how do they have a valid entry? So, apparently you have no idea what valid means. Gotcha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Power Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Valid? Aren't they a protectorate of TPF who is hitting a small alliance that hit NPO? One that TPF has not hit. So, AE has no treaty ties to NPO and yet is defending NPO without even a ghost DoW from TPF to make it valid. Seriously, you say some of the dumbest shit sometimes but wow, this statement lacks any sort of fact-checking or research. umm... wtf does counters have to do with anything? In fact, I was talking about checking your back for puppet strings and you are discussing gettin hit from behind. Two entirely different subjects mate. Should read the post of yours that I quoted instead of replying for the sake of replying. This is your problem. Ghost declarations and convoluted treaty chains are ridiculous. If NADC was itching to fight alongside Mi6 against TPF that badly, why don't MI6 and NADC have a treaty? Sign it half an hour before the declaration for all I care. According to everyone from your pals in TOP to their new pal Schattenmann, treaties are political tools. Wouldn't the opportunity to join forces against a common enemy be the ultimate political tool? As for AE entering in defence of NPO, it's not exactly a secret NPO and TPF generally fight together. For one to lend some resources to the other, especially when the other is getting battered from all sides, makes plenty of sense. Or do you actually not think TPF signed off on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.