Jump to content

An analysis of Mushqaeda political dynamics


Recommended Posts

Although I appreciate the mass response by the many TOP members in this thread, my target was not TOP (or TLR). Rather, I had hoped to highlight what I believe to be the shenanigans of a few radical former MK members. It's unfortunate that TOP does not see eye to eye with me. However, I am still optimistic; now that the issue has been demonstrated, all eyes are on Mushroom Kingdom, watching to see whether my words will continue to ring true.
 
This should have a limiting effect on MQ's strategic reserve in MK, and I'm sure TOP will be applying the necessary pressure behind the scenes to reign in any more rambunctious actions from MK. This, after all, is my sole goal here: to reign in threats to global stability. That wars be limited, and prosperity be widespread for all worthy nations, including neutral nations.
 
As long as Mushroom Kingdom does not continue to send reinforcements or aid to MQ/Doombird/etc, I don't see any further issues. Let's all hope the following does not continue:
 
599289_621354331238503_1223856954_n.jpg
 
I do believe the highlighted MK nations are legitimate war targets for the neutral coalition?

Now that you've been educated on TLR/TOP's dual protection of MK's peaceful nations I hope you begin using (TLR/TOP or TOP/TLR) instead of just TOP.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Now that you've been educated on TLR/TOP's dual protection of MK's peaceful nations I hope you begin using (TLR/TOP or TOP/TLR) instead of just TOP.

I think we all know that TOP is the only one in position to protect MK.  Plus we all know where most MK nations are going that don't delete.  But nice try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I appreciate the mass response by the many TOP members in this thread, my target was not TOP (or TLR). Rather, I had hoped to highlight what I believe to be the shenanigans of a few radical former MK members. It's unfortunate that TOP does not see eye to eye with me. However, I am still optimistic; now that the issue has been demonstrated, all eyes are on Mushroom Kingdom, watching to see whether my words will continue to ring true.

 

This should have a limiting effect on MQ's strategic reserve in MK, and I'm sure TOP will be applying the necessary pressure behind the scenes to reign in any more rambunctious actions from MK. This, after all, is my sole goal here: to reign in threats to global stability. That wars be limited, and prosperity be widespread for all worthy nations, including neutral nations.

 

As long as Mushroom Kingdom does not continue to send reinforcements or aid to MQ/Doombird/etc, I don't see any further issues. Let's all hope the following does not continue:

 

"Look at me!  I'm preventing this thing that wasn't a problem in the first place!  You should all give me credit!"

Edited by flak attack
Link to post
Share on other sites


I think we all know that TOP is the only one in position to protect MK.  Plus we all know where most MK nations are going that don't delete.  But nice try.

Nice try? I was just pointing out that another alliance signed the same statement as us. You looking completely ignorant if you continue to bring our name up again, and again, and again and not mention the alliance whose name is beside ours. Edited by Feanor Noldorin
Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone has likely said this already, but as regards the OP, I think you're over-thinking this one. Some of it is feasible, though your (conspiracy) theory, as far as I can tell, sort of falls apart at the end. That's just me, though.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy gangbang batman, you guys aren't pulling any punches on the discredit wagon. We have half of TOP's membership on the job for this one. With some Jihadi cameos of course.

The people yearn for enlightened discourse and we deliver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we all know that TOP is the only one in position to protect MK.  Plus we all know where most MK nations are going that don't delete.  But nice try.

 

We enjoy you when you're friendly, but we learned years ago to tune you out when you're unfriendly. You'd be best off spending your time on other pursuits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We enjoy you when you're friendly, but we learned years ago to tune you out when you're unfriendly. You'd be best off spending your time on other pursuits.

Glad to see the complete and total condescending nature of TOP hasn't gone away.  I had thought you had moved on past that, but it's clear you haven't changed one bit.

 

Win or loss, I know NG signs treaties with actual friends, not just "strategic partnerships" as TOP does.  Glad to see someone is still playing though.  We'll see how that works out for you long-term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should have a limiting effect on MQ's strategic reserve in MK, and I'm sure TOP will be applying the necessary pressure behind the scenes to reign in any more rambunctious actions from MK. This, after all, is my sole goal here: to reign in threats to global stability. That wars be limited, and prosperity be widespread for all worthy nations, including neutral nations.

 

Well thank God we have someone like you out there to help limit the wars on Bob! If you believe so strongly in your cause you should join up with TDO and fight the terrorists instead of complaining about it to a bunch of people who don't give a shit about your opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to see the complete and total condescending nature of TOP hasn't gone away.  I had thought you had moved on past that, but it's clear you haven't changed one bit.

 

Win or loss, I know NG signs treaties with actual friends, not just "strategic partnerships" as TOP does.  Glad to see someone is still playing though.  We'll see how that works out for you long-term.

 

Oh hey, you are back to disliking us. Stop pretending your opinion of us is dependent on anything other than our political relations at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I am disappointed if this represents TOP's official position in light of recent events. Redirecting attention to me and my past does not make my argument invalid. I wish TOP the best of luck in the future and hold no hostility toward Paradox or any other alliance.

 

Your failure to address the criticisms of your analysis demonstrate the glaring wholes inherent therein, that you have persisted with it regardless demonstrates a state of cognitive dissonance. It's a nice theory buddy, and these types of posts should be encouraged, just remember it's OK to admit that you might not have got it quite right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we all know that TOP is the only one in position to protect MK.  Plus we all know where most MK nations are going that don't delete.  But nice try.

Almost as though there was a reason we had TOP AND TLR protect us. Our disbandment isn't meant to cause a war between our allies while people try to feed off nations that want to peacefully delete or move on. In addition suggesting TLR couldn't bring a boat load of shit down onto anybody who touches the MK AA is hilarious.



As to the rest of the thread. It has made all of this worthwhile and i'd like to say a sincere thank you to everybody who is still scared of us. It's truly been a pleasure.
Link to post
Share on other sites

There would be nothing to gain materially from MK disbanding, having many people join MQ to hit a neutral and get countered, and then reforming.  It would be a stupid waste of warchests and war potential if our intention was just to reform.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There would be nothing to gain materially from MK disbanding, having many people join MQ to hit a neutral and get countered, and then reforming.  It would be a stupid waste of warchests and war potential if our intention was just to reform.

 

Well, I dont think anyone is concerned about MK/MQ reforming now. :smug:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...