Xanth Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 (edited) Oh look insults that's so unlike you. Do you have anything of substance to actually post or are you just here to show how well you can defend rey when he does something dumb? Edited September 19, 2013 by Xanth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 And you've been doing what, if not trying to insult someone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 Oh come now rey you know I would never pass up a chance like this when it comes to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 Thanks for confirming that all you're doing is (poorly) mudslinging. Move along now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 All im doing is pointing out the flaws in your Dow, attempted coup and subsequent arguments against those. When you have something to say other than name calling and various other diversionary tactics to attempt to get me to rage in this thread I will be all ears. Until then my original stance remains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 Well after reading that my brain started a civil war, hemisphere vs hemisphere, and left me a vegetative state. I thought MagicNinja had set the bar for terrible posting yesterday, but the Rey/Xanth power couple just blasted right on through and are probably still going as I type this. Also, someone nuke Rey a lot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 (edited) Well after reading that my brain started a civil war, hemisphere vs hemisphere, and left me a vegetative state. I thought MagicNinja had set the bar for terrible posting yesterday, but the Rey/Xanth power couple just blasted right on through and are probably still going as I type this. Also, someone nuke Rey a lot ♥ and in sure nato would be fine with you raiding a rouge such as Rey. Edited September 19, 2013 by Xanth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 (edited) ♥ and in sure nato would be fine with you raiding a rouge such as Rey.  I had no idea that Rey was a member of the Khmer Rouge*. This changes everything.  *[spoiler]The Khmer Rouge is a right-wing communist group that exists within the nation of Lancashire.[/spoiler] Edited September 19, 2013 by Hereno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 19, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 I had no idea that Rey was a member of the Khmer Rouge*. This changes everything. *[spoiler]The Khmer Rouge is a right-wing communist group that exists within the nation of Lancashire.[/spoiler]I mean, if you want to call me a Rouge, I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xanth Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 Such a good thread made bad by lazy proof reading and cellular swype keypads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis XVI Posted September 19, 2013 Report Share Posted September 19, 2013 Almost all of TTE is in peace mode and the one member of TDO that wasn't in anarchy or peace mode that I found fell like a domino. Neutrals, amirite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 Almost all of TTE is in peace mode and the one member of TDO that wasn't in anarchy or peace mode that I found fell like a domino. Neutrals, amiriteGotta live with what we have, man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vellocet Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 What clownery. :mellow: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 What clownery. :mellow:TTE defends friends: Bravo!Defending my friends: What clownery.At least make the double standard less obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vellocet Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 TTE defends friends: Bravo!Defending my friends: What clownery.At least make the double standard less obvious.Going rogue and raiding a neutral alliance together with the Mushqaeda isn't moral. Furthermore, you are defending the aggressor who declared war with no valid CB. It's a lost cause. And keep your delusions to yourself, if you please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 Rey let's not start making stupid arguments  Don't get mad at Rey for the stupidity ITT, you brought a truckload of your own brand before he even got a chance to type. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 (edited) Going rogue and raiding a neutral alliance together with the Mushqaeda isn't moral. Furthermore, you are defending the aggressor who declared war with no valid CB. It's a lost cause. And keep your delusions to yourself, if you please.Is it truly moral to defend a neutral alliance, who should have far superior warchests? They should be able to withstand assault, given that they posted their own announcement claiming they will neither fail nor fold. I am here to help my friends, not to play your petty little game of "Who's Right?" as nobody else seems to care. I am here for my friends in Mushqaeda, whether you find the initial attack distasteful, wonderful, or bland.I have just as much right (more, actually, given DBDC's involvement) to be here as TTE, and am being far less opportunistic given that TTE declared on a "treatyless" alliance knowing full well the ties, including a bloc, they hold themselves. Edited September 20, 2013 by Neo Uruk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 To be fair, the infidel I'm slaying has 500 million dollars at 6k NS and hasn't done more than launch two cruise missiles at me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 Going rogue and raiding a neutral alliance together with the Mushqaeda isn't moral. Furthermore, you are defending the aggressor who declared war with no valid CB. It's a lost cause. And keep your delusions to yourself, if you please. A few things: Â 1. MK (and its members) isn't exactly known for its morality and following your silly rules. 2. A CB doesn't have to be valid. It's a casus belli, a reason for war. No one will ever be pleased with a CB. Mushqaeda stated why we're attacking TDO. You can accept it or not but it won't change a thing. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 To be fair, the infidel I'm slaying has 500 million dollars at 6k NS and hasn't done more than launch two cruise missiles at me.Open up your inbox, duder. Also, I've had one fight back and had one (well, two if you count para) attack me so far. I won't be able to declare on any others when my next slot opens because of nukes.PS potato ily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parandiac Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 nuclear anarchy is good for you, rey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smurthwaite Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 nuclear anarchy is good for you, rey. I just thought this was quotable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Zigur Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 (edited) A few things: Â 1. MK (and its members) isn't exactly known for its morality and following your silly rules. 2. A CB doesn't have to be valid. It's a casus belli, a reason for war. No one will ever be pleased with a CB. Mushqaeda stated why we're attacking TDO. You can accept it or not but it won't change a thing. Â Â I don't think you quite understand what a Casus Belli is. Casus Belli translates to "Case for war;" What sets aside a proper Casus Belli is that it lays out a moral, legal case for war based on the principle of national self interests. A good Casus Belli is lengthy and describes to all how the enemy continued to offend or threaten despite diplomatic efforts being made. Â To quote: "A nation's casus belli involves offenses or threats directly against it, whereas a nation's casus foederis involves offenses or threats to an ally nation or nations--usually one with which it has a mutual defense pact." Neither of these conditions were met in attacking TDO, because TDO never represented a threat to MK, or slighted MK in a materialist sense. Â This continues to highlight the differences between materialist philosophies like Francoism which endorses foreign affairs based on stability, and others including the "lulz" mentalities who exercise power without discipline and ultimately drown themselves in their own folly. Edited September 21, 2013 by Tywin Lannister Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parandiac Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 you can't quote wikipedia, man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster83 Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 I don't think you quite understand what a Casus Belli is. Casus Belli translates to "Case for war;" What sets aside a proper Casus Belli is that it lays out a moral, legal case for war based on the principle of national self interests. A good Casus Belli is lengthy and describes to all how the enemy continued to offend or threaten despite diplomatic efforts being made. Â To quote wikipedia: "A nation's casus belli involves offenses or threats directly against it, whereas a nation's casus foederis involves offenses or threats to an ally nation or nations--usually one with which it has a mutual defense pact." Neither of these conditions were met in attacking TDO, because TDO never represented a threat to MK, or slighted MK in a materialist sense. Â This continues to highlight the differences between materialist philosophies like Francoism which endorses foreign affairs based on stability, and others including the "lulz" mentalities who exercise power without discipline and ultimately drown themselves in their own folly. Â Ultimately it is all down to perceptions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.