Xanth Posted September 20, 2013 Report Share Posted September 20, 2013 (edited) you can't quote wikipedia, man what about if he is referencing the cnwiki? http://cybernations.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_terms_used_in_Cyber_Nations Edited September 20, 2013 by Xanth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parandiac Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 it's not really wikipedia, but i mean... when nations gonna raid... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted September 21, 2013 Report Share Posted September 21, 2013 I don't think you quite understand what a Casus Belli is. Casus Belli translates to "Case for war;" What sets aside a proper Casus Belli is that it lays out a moral, legal case for war based on the principle of national self interests. A good Casus Belli is lengthy and describes to all how the enemy continued to offend or threaten despite diplomatic efforts being made. To quote: "A nation's casus belli involves offenses or threats directly against it, whereas a nation's casus foederis involves offenses or threats to an ally nation or nations--usually one with which it has a mutual defense pact." Neither of these conditions were met in attacking TDO, because TDO never represented a threat to MK, or slighted MK in a materialist sense. This continues to highlight the differences between materialist philosophies like Francoism which endorses foreign affairs based on stability, and others including the "lulz" mentalities who exercise power without discipline and ultimately drown themselves in their own folly. Right. Our case for war is that we're tired of neutrals. Get it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted September 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 Right. Our case for war is that we're tired of neutrals. Get it?He really, really doesn't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louis XVI Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I don't understand why people defend neutrals. They shouldn't want you to, they're neutrals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 I don't understand why people defend neutrals. They shouldn't want you to, they're neutrals And if you're going to defend a neutral, do it. Don't half-ass your attacks and then call your friends in to help you when you can't handle things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 And if you're going to defend a neutral, do it. Don't half-ass your attacks and then call your friends in to help you when you can't handle things. I won't sit here and pretend I disagree with this, if you feel you should defend neutrals, pull every single string you have available to you, ensure that your ideals are those that actually occur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted September 22, 2013 Report Share Posted September 22, 2013 Lol have fun Rey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.