NoMercy Posted September 5, 2013 Report Share Posted September 5, 2013 DL was formed hailing the success of the RL DIE LINKE. So if sarcasm was intended, it's because you were 'oblivious' (which is quite understandable considering your alliance name).. OOC: There is no success. I am sorry to disappoint you. IC: Does that mean you guys are a completely peaceful alliance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azreal Posted September 5, 2013 Report Share Posted September 5, 2013 A bunch of alliances that refuse to give up their tiny poritons of power to remain "soverign" entities merge their FA departments and will now persue things by commitie. This is clearly a masterstroke and will not fail miserably at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes the wise Posted September 5, 2013 Report Share Posted September 5, 2013 Interesting development....Whose idea was this? Good luck to you guys, especially our friends in UCR :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Posted September 5, 2013 Report Share Posted September 5, 2013 OOC: There is no success. I am sorry to disappoint you. IC: Does that mean you guys are a completely peaceful alliance? I can't speak for the rest of DL, but yeah I'm aware of this. I'm pretty sure it was originally just an innocent translation of "the Left" into a cool-sounding language, which also happened to be the name of a political party. I pushed for the name to stick cause I study German and therefore like it when things revolve around the country. Idgaf about the real die Linke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 As I read this, I could almost hear NoR discussing plans of attacking this... I kid. Good luck guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Craig Posted September 6, 2013 Report Share Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) This looks like an evolution backwards towards the factions/parties that we experimented with in the LSF, somewhere around 2007 or so. It ended up causing a lot of discord when people began associate with the factions and not the alliance. They were eventually banned, as I recall. Maybe your will work out better because you're moving in the other direction... But my advice, for what it's worth, is to accelerate the merger process and work out the cultural issues (if any) that might divide you. Other people have already said it, but you will be stronger under one banner than you are under three. oh yeah, [insert obligatory splitters insult here] -Craig Edited September 6, 2013 by Comrade Craig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tehmina Posted September 9, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2013 <3 thanks for the advice Craig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.602c3e6dc1b979035ecb8d8ca2be9b8b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.