Holy Ruler Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 Beat me to it. That's pretty lame. I know, right. Why does the enemy have to keep track of the losses they are causing your coalition? Pretty lame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 I know, right. Why does the enemy have to keep track of the losses they are causing your coalition? Pretty lame. Is it for a personal pat on the back, or what? Mad war skills bro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 (edited) Is it for a personal pat on the back, or what? Mad war skills bro. You know, every time I read someone bragging about the "damage he inflicts" with such pride and (supposed) precission, I have a flashback to a certain comedy series... You scared? You should be, 'cause I'm Billy Reed. Do you know how many girls I've had sex with? [holds up four fingers] Four. Edited March 23, 2013 by Krashnaia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 (edited) If you were truly winning, you wouldn't have to bail your coalition partners out every other cycle and give CnG a breather. I'm not sure where you get the idea EQ willingness to distribute resources more effectively as the war progresses can be spun into anything negative for our side, but make up your mind on whether EQ is winning and using to much force, or if we're not really winning and should use more to win. Complaining about the former, then saying it shows the latter doesn't really make sense. If you guys complain so much about it, I think it only verifies the correct decisions were made and our side should do some more DoWs to really crush whatever hopes some on your side might have. So far I've seen complaints from you guys about, 1. EQ having more alliances than needed declare on some on your side. 2. EQ didn't suddenly stop doing DoWs due to the length of the war. Both of those things are just using good tactics, there is no reason to suddenly stop using tactics to bring victory faster and easier. That your side is complaining about EQ doing this, rather than also shifting NS to counter it just further shows the kind of position your side is in. Edited March 23, 2013 by Methrage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted March 23, 2013 Report Share Posted March 23, 2013 (Bolded) Do people actually keep track of their stats like this? It's really easy with the new war damage feature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holy Ruler Posted March 24, 2013 Report Share Posted March 24, 2013 It's really easy with the new war damage feature. And you had to tell them how to do it. :ehm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted March 24, 2013 Report Share Posted March 24, 2013 And you had to tell them how to do it. :ehm: Oh man, now we know. What luck. Anyway, I still don't see a purpose other than a personal pat on the back. Are you surprised it's above one when you can nuke multiple times a day and only receive one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the rebel Posted March 25, 2013 Report Share Posted March 25, 2013 (edited) Anyway, I still don't see a purpose other than a personal pat on the back. Are you surprised it's above one when you can nuke multiple times a day and only receive one? Cause they can't gloat about winning so need to gloat about something to keep morale up. Edited March 25, 2013 by the rebel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walshington Posted March 25, 2013 Report Share Posted March 25, 2013 Germans have always faired well against the Poles. I just read this whole ridiculous thread to see if ANYone responded to this. They did not, and thus I am compelled: I see what you did there. And I want to smother you for it. In gravy. Hating you because I didn't post it first, Walsh the Beloved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted March 25, 2013 Report Share Posted March 25, 2013 I did not see that post either. Quite a good post. Haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arentak Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 Germans have always faired well against the Poles. Except that one time.....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grunwald Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 When you have to go back 600 years to find a victory, it's a bad sign :s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted March 26, 2013 Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 An attack on one is an attack on all. Competence indeed. DoubleStandards Nations. Infowars.com. Chemtrails. Polaris prevails. MKarma is here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.