Rush Sykes Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Seriously... stop with this silly rhetoric urging the bulk of C&G forces out of peace mode and pretending like you are just lying in wait, licking your chops to decimate us when we do come out. You have ridiculous numerical superiority, and you run around on this forum like you are this well oiled machine of war and somehow our peace mode nations are preventing you from fulfilling your ultimate destiny. Well... there are about a zillion numbers threads, so I am now going to throw out some numbers that I too have collected. ODN --- 122 War Mode --- 366 Potential Defensive Slots --- 169 defensive slots filled GATO --- 51 War Mode --- 153 Potential Defensive Slots --- 23 defensive slots filled TLR --- 58 War Mode (counting those AA hopping, I wont tell you where to find them) --- 174 Potential Defensive Slots --- 120 defensive slots filled INT --- 35 War Mode --- 105 Potential Defensive Slots --- 48 defensive slots filled NG(only the AA proper) --- 51 War Mode --- 153 Potential Defensive Slots --- 75 defensive slots filled __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Surely with the statistical numerical advantage of the finely honed war machine that is SF-XX-Afterbirth, and given their constant clamoring for us to bring the tiers as yet unneeded out of PM, these paltry few are well covered. Surely they are? Total among bulk of C&G + NG 317 Nations in war mode 951 total defensive slots 435 defensive slots filled 45.7% of defensive slots filled __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Here is a thought to you inactive hunks of bloat in XX and you useless chunk of wastes of space in SF and you pathetic remnants of the female placenta following labor,,,, How about you 1st handle what is there before you before you demand more. The reality is, you are relying DR and the rest of EQ to elevate your sad little alliances to a seat at the big kids table through a long awaited victory that you have so longed after. How about you now stop your crying for more targets, and step up and do the job that is expected of you. Your collective incompetence literally knows no bounds, and you should all be ashamed of those numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luckao Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Take that, you useless, pathetic, insignificant, pitiful... oh! Cookies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Ahem. ~tHe CaLlOuT~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 OMG RUSH Y U NO BRING US DEFENSIVE WARS You did promise QH afterall... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shave N Haircut Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Ahem. The proper use of the word "Decimate" must have something to do with extracting a tenth of something or other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Hear Hear Gentle RushSykesAt least my sluts are kept filled... only way I'm gonna increase my casualty count ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Ahem. ~tHe CaLlOuT~ A pre-empted callout Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yevgeni Luchenkov Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 At least Rush's thread is relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsoxbronco1 Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 I'm excited to see what Commander shepard has to say about how this is really Umbrella and Doomhouse's fault for dodging wars in the past or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luckao Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 At least Rush's thread is relevant. Yet every new one is as insipid as the last. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 I'm pretty sure that individual alliances in the past have managed to to put out more wars than SF/XX are collectively putting at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itseZe Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 I'm pretty sure that individual alliances in the past have managed to to put out more wars than SF/XX are collectively putting at. Correct. Just a quick search shows that at least NG, NPO and IRON put out equal or greater numbers of offensive wars as recent as the last war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) GATO --- 51 War Mode --- 153 Potential Defensive Slots --- 23 defensive slots filled Is GATO coming out? Not really, 90 of those 153 Potential Defensive Slots are Nations that no one cares too much to complain about under 5k NS. ODN --- 122 War Mode --- 366 Potential Defensive Slots --- 169 defensiveslots filled ODN is much the same, ~210 of their defensive war slots are 10k NS and under. Much the same for the rest of CnG. Most of the relevant parts of the alliances are in peace mode, just under half of ODN is in peace mode and most of GATO is in peace mode. Now I know why it is Derp Rush Edited February 23, 2013 by Commander shepard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omniscient1 Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) (Since this isn't an IC forum, I'll refrain from pointing out how hilarious it is that ~your side~ has become the champion of peace mode considering the past 3 wars. ) Cool stats bro. I agree peace mode talk is dumb. Edited February 23, 2013 by Omniscient1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarquista Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 another good stats topic, although the numbers are skewed :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Is GATO coming out? Not really, 90 of those 153 Potential Defensive Slots are Nations that no one cares too much to complain about under 5k NS. ODN is much the same, ~210 of their defensive war slots are 10k NS and under. Much the same for the rest of CnG. Most of the relevant parts of the alliances are in peace mode, just under half of ODN is in peace mode and most of GATO is in peace mode. Now I know why it is Derp Rush /thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqaCrij7SLiidGxUVllNUDBWZndPNHZuTFE3MDdEMkE&usp=sharing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucovina Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 not to mention that: Damage done: EQ: 3,824,516 WE: 4,174,775 The numbers don't lie. Considering your large numbers..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADude Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) not to mention that: Damage done: EQ: 3,824,516 WE: 4,174,775 The numbers don't lie. Considering your large numbers..... "You have ridiculous numerical superiority" Numbers make perfect sense to me. Edited February 23, 2013 by ADude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Namayan Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqaCrij7SLiidGxUVllNUDBWZndPNHZuTFE3MDdEMkE&usp=sharing Those are very revealing stats. Isnt Equilibrium suppose to dominate 100k-80k NS? What is with the 0% defensive slots? From those stats, the focus of Equilibrium on this front is concentrated mostly at the 40-60k NS By correlating this stat from shinra:(http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/115443-upper-tier-tracking-thread/page-4), one can assume that the numerical superiority is suppose to dominate C&G and co. But the stats given by USmurf seems to otherwise contradict it, SF/XX/Aftermath and co. 120k+ - 12 (0) --> 12 (0) 100k - 20 (1) --> 20 (3) 80k - 97 (51) --> 84 (42) CnG and Co. 120k+ - 37 (23) --> 44 (30) 100k+ - 19 (11) --> 19 (10) 80k - 56 (14) --> 61 (17) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucovina Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 half of the bob declared on CnG, how can we have supperior numbers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon2269 Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Hear Hear Gentle RushSykes At least my sluts are kept filled... only way I'm gonna increase my casualty count ;) Either this is a brilliant typo or a very good use of wordage. Either way it made me chuckle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 half of the bob declared on CnG, how can we have supperior numbers?If I recall the opening stats correctly, even with half the world declaring on them, CnG still had the advantage in the upper tiers. CnG is fighting this war very smartly and should get credit for doing so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucovina Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Thank you. And that is why EQ stays in PM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 Hey Rush, remember the past two wars when you were calling out XX/SF to come out of peace mode? now you're on the losing side and get to experience the same thing, if it was ok for you to do it then, it is entirely ok for us to do it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.