Jump to content

Defendo nostrum Socius


Tiagoroth

Recommended Posts

What I love about this part of the war is that it started because alliances not treatied to NPO attacked one of NPO's allies (TLR). Now more NPO non-treaty partners are attacking another NPO ally (NG). I'm sure the NPO is absolutely thrilled about that.
 
I felt it necessary to mention this in very clear, plain language.
 


No matter what happens it'll be used as a criticism of Pacifica. If NPO responds, they just wanted to use SF and co as cannon fodder. If they don't respond they don't care about allies. The smart move would be to shit talk Polar, TYK, and NADC in back rooms and support the coalition in public. Personally, I think we should round up everyone putting themselves before the coalition and kill them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No matter what happens it'll be used as a criticism of Pacifica. If NPO responds, they just wanted to use SF and co as cannon fodder. If they don't respond they don't care about allies. The smart move would be to shit talk Polar, TYK, and NADC in back rooms and support the coalition in public. Personally, I think we should round up everyone putting themselves before the coalition and kill them.

How is defending an MDoAP putting yourself before the coalition? And don't get me going on the lack of communication. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is defending an MDoAP putting yourself before the coalition? And don't get me going on the lack of communication. 

You decided to draw in the one alliance the coalition had decided it didn't want in on the other side. You proceeded to then have someone counter that alliance.

But please continue showing why TTK is a bastion of excellence in CN.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You decided to draw in the one alliance the coalition had decided it didn't want in on the other side. You proceeded to then have someone counter that alliance.

 

And again I'll bring up "the lack of communication." Interesting how 3 blocs weren't notified to not counter TLR. We made it pretty obvious they were getting hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You decided to draw in the one alliance the coalition had decided it didn't want in on the other side. You proceeded to then have someone counter that alliance.

But please continue showing why TTK is a bastion of excellence in CN.

 


Clearly NADC is at fault for defending their ally. TTK is also at fault, they told NG to attack them and put themselves on "that side" of the coalition.

 

No
matter what happens it'll be used as a criticism of Pacifica. If NPO
responds, they just wanted to use SF and co as cannon fodder. If they
don't respond they don't care about allies. The smart move would be to
shit talk Polar, TYK, and NADC in back rooms and support the coalition
in public. Personally, I think we should round up everyone putting
themselves before the coalition and kill them.

 


 

Yes, You are right. TTK is responsible for being attacked by NG.

Edited by Rotavele
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'm a bit puzzled about the whining from everyone else. If Stewie is any indication, NG is more than excited about having a go at us, and everyone knows there simply haven't been enough slots to go around on the Equilibrium side. Somehow, I doubt that NG wants competition for our limited slots (unless of course, they came out of PM :p)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'm a bit puzzled about the whining from everyone else. If Stewie is any indication, NG is more than excited about having a go at us, and everyone knows there simply haven't been enough slots to go around on the Equilibrium side. Somehow, I doubt that NG wants competition for our limited slots (unless of course, they came out of PM :P)

 

 

Very bad strategy of a NADC chairman or for NADC as a whole.  Declaring war on an alliance who have limited or no war slots at an NS level you want to fight.  

 

Why not just get your top tier out of peace mode if you are so eager for war for defending an ally and dont care about strategy?  If this is about strategy, why declare someone with less war slots that TTK can fill up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very bad strategy of a NADC chairman or for NADC as a whole.  Declaring war on an alliance who have limited or no war slots at an NS level you want to fight.  

 

Why not just get your top tier out of peace mode if you are so eager for war for defending an ally and dont care about strategy?  If this is about strategy, why declare someone with less war slots that TTK can fill up?

 


Umm....

 

 

Your trying too hard, Just stop posting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'm a bit puzzled about the whining from everyone else. If Stewie is any indication, NG is more than excited about having a go at us, and everyone knows there simply haven't been enough slots to go around on the Equilibrium side. Somehow, I doubt that NG wants competition for our limited slots (unless of course, they came out of PM :p)


War Gud
Casualties Gud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...