Jump to content

Notice of Policing Action


Recommended Posts

[center][img]http://i.imgur.com/zh5UL.png[/img][/center]

Howdy all,

Just letting everyone know that Tetris will be perform a small policing action on the Peoples Republic Of Independent States. One of their nations rogued one of ours, and they have failed to respond to the ultimatum we issued.

We have also invited our allies to engage them at their will seeing as the alliance is all sub 7k NS nations.

In addition to this, we are issuing individual surrender terms to all enemy combatants. The terms are as follows:

[quote]
-Resign from the Peoples Republic of Independent States

-Change their alliance affiliation to "Tetris POW"

-In order to leave the Tetris POW AA, they must join an alliance of their choice that we approve of.[/quote]


Through this, we hope that the nations in this alliance can learn from their mistakes as well as join an alliance that will help them play and enjoy the game more. That is all.

signed for Tetris,

USMC123, Game Developer
Ali5541, Project Manager and Programmer of the Matrix
Kenfolk GTS, Programmer of Foreign Affairs
Hereno, Programmer of Game Patent
Tank4ever, Programmer of Line Completion and Components

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 434
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Doing this to a small alliance makes you feel important? Powerful? It just shows you lack size where it counts.

A rogue that is 1,199.474 NS and you're going all out with an announcement :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1337747773' post='2970841']
Next time you post a topic like this I want a bigger war. [img]http://mushroom-kingdom.info/boards/Smileys/kickass/colbert.gif[/img]
[/quote]

But last time they made a bunch of announcements and got a bigger war from it, they lost to The Legion. :unsure:

EDIT: Also, kudos on the impressive blitz, Tetris. :awesome:

Edited by Lord Boris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time people didn't post, people cried about it. Get over it.

e: It's a 14 man AA whose leadership disappeared overnight. Rather than have the nations all disappear from the game, we are attempting to help them have a real go at CN.

Edited by USMC123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Lord Boris' timestamp='1337747827' post='2970843']
But last time they made a bunch of announcements and got a bigger war from it, they lost to The Legion. :unsure:

EDIT: Also, kudos on the impressive blitz, Tetris. :awesome:
[/quote]

So clever and original!

e: Also for Christ's sake you people have no reading comprehension. Since when does an alliance hold the entirety of another alliance to INDIVIDUAL surrender terms?

Edited by USMC123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1337748283' post='2970850']
So clever and original!

e: Also for Christ's sake you people have no reading comprehension. Since when does an alliance hold the entirety of another alliance to INDIVIDUAL surrender terms?
[/quote]

You must think you're clever. You didn't really think this announcement was going to receive hails did you? You should just retract the entire announcement and deal with that "rogue" individually.

Try again.

Edited by garcia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='garcia' timestamp='1337748687' post='2970853']
You must think you're clever. You didn't really think this announcement was going to receive hails did you? You should just retract the entire announcement and deal with that "rogue" individually.

Try again.
[/quote]

Or we can proceed as planned. I like that idea more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1337748941' post='2970859']
Or we can proceed as planned. I like that idea more.
[/quote]
If the idea of making yourself and your alliance look foolish is an idea you like, then by all means proceed. You're doing a damn fine job of it.

Try again - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfmdBPl48uw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's still time, edit all of your posts to reflect that you are policing an individual rogue!

I know you think that you aren't "disbanding" an alliance (that is literally so small you can't disband them yourselves without help from allies with smaller members) just because you're asking all of the members to surrender individually and go elsewhere, but what is the difference? What was your ultimatum? I can't imagine that it was reasonable, since you admit that they are all tiny and have zero leadership. Just deal with your rogue instead of tacitly inviting raiders to do your work for you over what was probably more a reaction to a vulgar PM response than the actual rogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='garcia' timestamp='1337749276' post='2970866']
If the idea of making yourself and your alliance look foolish is an idea you like, then by all means proceed. You're doing a damn fine job of it.

Try again - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfmdBPl48uw
[/quote]

This is only mildly ironic.

-Blow a small scale war out of proportion - Check
-Cry about very lenient individual surrender terms so nations who don't want to fight don't have to - Check
-Take a dump all over your ally in public - Check

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1337749507' post='2970870']
-Blow a small scale war out of proportion - Check
[/quote]

[quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1337749507' post='2970870']
This is only mildly ironic.
[/quote]

don't need to say anything

Edited by Nikita Ilyich Lenin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this will work out very well for Tetris's PR.

edit: I can't even comprehend what you were thinking when you decided announcing this would be a smart move.

Edited by Mogar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='USMC123' timestamp='1337749507' post='2970870']
This is only mildly ironic.

-Blow a small scale war out of proportion - Check
-Cry about very lenient individual surrender terms so nations who don't want to fight don't have to - Check
-Take a dump all over your ally in public - Check
[/quote]
You blew a rogue out of proportion and turned it into a police action against that alliance.
Leniency is not disbanding that alliance and making all fight for the actions of one rogue.
You took a dump on your allies first with this announcement.

You really made my argument for me. You're not clever after all.

Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Don Chele' timestamp='1337749416' post='2970868']
There's still time, edit all of your posts to reflect that you are policing an individual rogue!

I know you think that you aren't "disbanding" an alliance (that is literally so small you can't disband them yourselves without help from allies with smaller members) just because you're asking all of the members to surrender individually and go elsewhere, but what is the difference? What was your ultimatum? I can't imagine that it was reasonable, since you admit that they are all tiny and have zero leadership. Just deal with your rogue instead of tacitly inviting raiders to do your work for you over what was probably more a reaction to a vulgar PM response than the actual rogue.
[/quote]

Nah. It was just ignoring our PMs altogether, and we asked for 50 tech (less than three mil, and not really unreasonable after the repeat attacks/lack of peace etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...