Jaiar Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 [quote name='potato' timestamp='1327693096' post='2908370'] Why would we want to roll RoK though? [/quote] Ask Leet. [quote name='Captain Flinders' timestamp='1327693297' post='2908371'] Even if we were to entertain your paranoia, I don't see how the treaty would help. Best case scenario, we get FARK and maybe XX help. This most recent war displayed quite handily how incapable they are on the battlefield. They would be of little help. Most likely scenario, they say "meh" and promise to rebuild RoK after the war. Basically, even if you're right (which you're not) the treaty is of little benefit to anyone. You should think your posts out before you make them. Don't just say stuff for the sake of saying something. That's stupid. [/quote] It's not paranoia. You should ask Leet about what he says because he most definitely had the idea in mind to roll Rok. That or he is just trying to cozy up to VE to mend strained relations and what better way to do it than propose to them the rolling of Rok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoomzoomzoom Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 Why does everyone assume we're done with SF/XX? History tells us you have to roll the same person at least three more times to be done with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1327694301' post='2908377'] It's not paranoia. You should ask Leet about what he says because he most definitely had the idea in mind to roll Rok. That or he is just trying to cozy up to VE to mend strained relations and what better way to do it than propose to them the rolling of Rok. [/quote] You obviously missed the point of my post. Additionally, a funny thing happens after you get rolled hard. You stop caring about the possibility of getting rolled. This happened to me ages ago. I heard NPL took a bit of a beating in this war. You'd think you would have chilled out a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1327694301' post='2908377'] Ask Leet. [/quote] I'm asking YOU since YOU are the one claiming MK wants to roll RoK. Edited January 27, 2012 by potato Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geerland Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 task force 6-26 roll out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Londo Mollari Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Bob Ilyani' timestamp='1327615568' post='2907596'] Yeah for sure this is totally happening And, if I may add a little bit of clarification, Hoo resigned from Ragnarok maybe 2 months ago and joined his own AA, The Bear Cavalry. Kait posted in Ragnarok's forums the intention of joining her husband after the conclusion of the war with CSN. Now that the war has been concluded, we consider Kait's words to be in effect and thus she is no longer a member of Ragnarok. Her remainder on the Ragnarok AA is not approved nor permitted by Ragnarok's government, and we do not hold any sort of protection over The Bear Cavalry. [/quote] [s]This is NOT how you treat someone who served as leader of your alliance.[/s] EDIT: I see that I've not been paying attention AT ALL for some time. Edited January 28, 2012 by Londo Mollari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeeeet Ronny D Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 Congrats to Fark, on dropping the on going Trainwreck of Awesome that is Rok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xR1 Fatal Instinct Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Bob Ilyani' timestamp='1327615568' post='2907596'] Yeah for sure this is totally happening And, if I may add a little bit of clarification, Hoo resigned from Ragnarok maybe 2 months ago and joined his own AA, The Bear Cavalry. Kait posted in Ragnarok's forums the intention of joining her husband after the conclusion of the war with CSN. Now that the war has been concluded, we consider Kait's words to be in effect and thus she is no longer a member of Ragnarok. Her remainder on the Ragnarok AA is not approved nor permitted by Ragnarok's government, and we do not hold any sort of protection over The Bear Cavalry. [/quote] Considering they just got things to calm down in their household, you typically wait til a resignation is posted to remove membership status (or the removal of Alliance Affiliate status). "Afer the conclusion of the war" is very vague and could have meant in a month or in a few days after the war. Both Hoo and Kaitlin were the leaders of Ragnarok and it saddens me to see you throw them under the bus so quickly. Albeit, yes that can be taken as a void of membership, you could have contacted her in such regards. None the less it is you, so I can't expect much else. Edited January 27, 2012 by xR1 Fatal Instinct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gobb Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 Before, I did overlook decided aspects drastically, but I overtly do admit: demonic Bob is, obviously dreaded and... devilish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikita Ilyich Lenin Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1327694551' post='2908378'] Why does everyone assume we're done with SF/XX? History tells us you have to roll the same person at least three more times to be done with them. [/quote] It will be a glorious slaughter... over.. and over... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted January 27, 2012 Report Share Posted January 27, 2012 (edited) In any case I'm happy this treaty is done for. I would've expected RoK to cancel on FARK instead of the other way around. It's good to see tables turned on FARK. Sweet justice. Yeah I thought it was common knowledge why we gave FARK such an easy surrender. [spoiler] So that we could bang them again after they repurchased[/spoiler] Edited January 27, 2012 by kriekfreak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1327704429' post='2908464'] In any case I'm happy this treaty is done for. I would've expected RoK to cancel on FARK instead of the other way around. It's good to see tables turned on FARK. Sweet justice. Yeah I thought it was common knowledge why we gave FARK such an easy surrender. [spoiler] So that we could bang them again after they repurchased[/spoiler] [/quote] Does this mean a year of "we'll roll you soon!" posts ala TOP? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1327694301' post='2908377'] Ask Leet. It's not paranoia. You should ask Leet about what he says because he most definitely had the idea in mind to roll Rok. That or he is just trying to cozy up to VE to mend strained relations and what better way to do it than propose to them the rolling of Rok. [/quote] What is it you that think you accomplish here with your constant blathering that nobody listens to? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kongo Jack IV Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 I really love you, bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Arcturus Jefferson' timestamp='1327713000' post='2908536'] Does this mean a year of "we'll roll you soon!" posts ala TOP? [/quote] No, NG & allies will just roll them every 4 months like clockwork. Means we will be ready for a new enemy by next year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1327684132' post='2908297'] Fark is too busy hunting Nazis to move closer to MJ [/quote] They're still jealous. I was surprised Fark kept this treaty as long as they did. I can only presume it was in hopes that it may help stave off their rolling and now that it obviously didn't work, it's time to cancel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krack Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1327717748' post='2908559'] They're still jealous. I was surprised Fark kept this treaty as long as they did. I can only presume it was in hopes that it may help stave off their rolling and now that it obviously didn't work, it's time to cancel. [/quote] Well, it was either that ... or Rok got a new d-bag head of state and it's bad form to start dropping treaties in the middle of a war. One or the other. Edited January 28, 2012 by Krack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgrum Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Krack' timestamp='1327721018' post='2908574'] Well, it was either that ... or Rok got a new d-bag head of state and it's bad form to start dropping treaties in the middle of a war. One or the other. [/quote] Its the new !@#$% bag head of state, dont mince words its unbecoming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Krack' timestamp='1327721018' post='2908574'] Well, it was either that ... or Rok got a new d-bag head of state and it's bad form to start dropping treaties in the middle of a war. One or the other. [/quote] Oh boy, personal attacks. Bob must have really struck a nerve with this. I hope he keeps it up, if for no other purpose than to upset you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1327737133' post='2908716'] Oh boy, personal attacks. Bob must have really struck a nerve with this. I hope he keeps it up, if for no other purpose than to upset you. [/quote] It appears Rok may not allow that to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1327737133' post='2908716'] Oh boy, personal attacks. [/quote] The height of irony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melancholy Culkin Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 Best intentions obviously didn't affect decisions... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1327769624' post='2908793'] The height of irony. [/quote] Oh Schatt, digging up the past as usual. You find anything interesting down there? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 I wasn't aware that current events are categorized under "the past" but if you want to be cute, that's your call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EgoFreaky Posted January 29, 2012 Report Share Posted January 29, 2012 [quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1327787211' post='2908940'] Oh Schatt, digging up the past as usual. You find anything interesting down there? [/quote] *Facepalm* You might want to think 10 seconds before posting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.