King Xander the Only Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 (edited) [center][img]http://images.wikia.com/cybernations/images/f/fa/Ngwar.png[/img] [img]http://www.non-grata.net/uploads/Bannerlion-eagle.png[/img][/center] Non Grata today offers the nations of SOS Brigade the following terms for individual surrender: [QUOTE]SOS Brigade nations wishing to surrender to Non Grata agree to abide to the following terms: I. Military Decom 1. Decom all military improvements (except those required for the Strategic Defense Initiative), soldiers to at least 25% of population, and all tanks, planes, nukes, and naval ships. 2. Change Alliance Affiliation to “NG POW” You may change your AA at the conclusion of the war after terms in section II are completed. 3. Place “Protected by Non Grata” in nation bio. 4. Post “I (ruler name of nation name) surrender to Non Grata” in the following topic on the CN forums. http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=213 II. Monetary Reps 1. You agree to pay Non Grata the following amount of reps at the conclusion of Non Grata's war effort. NG triumvirs will inform you of your aid target. a. Nations 15k NS and below – 0 reparations b. Nations above 5k tech - 200 tech c. Everyone else - 3 million/50 tech Non Grata has the right to attack you should you fail to comply.[/QUOTE] It should be noted that these terms are not offered to those nations that just left peace mode yesterday. We thank you all for your continued support. Edited October 23, 2011 by King Xander the Only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 You are too nice for this world Non Grata. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feestaap1 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Like Kriek said... you are too nice for planet bob! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 So are reps in individual terms like a thing now or what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katy Perry Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Non Grata are horrible and are killing this game. This is extortion! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1319402578' post='2831039'] So are reps in individual terms like a thing now or what? [/quote] I surely hope so. Deserters shouldn't be able to come out clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jtkode Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Reps=Fail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1319402578' post='2831039'] So are reps in individual terms like a thing now or what? [/quote] It's not like war deserters are gonna be welcomed in too many places. Reps will at least clean up a slim bit of that tarnish! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locke Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1319402634' post='2831041'] I surely hope so. Deserters shouldn't be able to come out clean. [/quote] I always thought that the purpose of individual terms was to encourage enemy nations to desert, and thus make the fight easier. What encouragement do you offer them with these terms? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artigo Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Good. Since they aren't fighting back the least they can do is pay up some tech since we can't steal it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rampage3 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 NG...Like a Boss. Carry on. And my take is that NonGrata doesn't care IF anyone surrenders, but they plan to make them pay for the privilege of desertion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeR Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Haha, how embarrassing it would be to surrender, even more that you would have to pay to surrender. Cool style NG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccabal86 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1319404486' post='2831068'] What encouragement do you offer them with these terms? [/quote] None? hint hint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1319404486' post='2831068'] I always thought that the purpose of individual terms was to encourage enemy nations to desert, and thus make the fight easier. What encouragement do you offer them with these terms? [/quote] Are you implying that this costs more than a war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MitchellBade Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Katy Perry' timestamp='1319402580' post='2831040'] This is extortion! [/quote] Yes, initiating an aggressive conflict and then demanding that the defenders then pay you reparations for the war fits the exact definition of extortion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dejarue Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 I hope you guys get wiped out off the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1319402578' post='2831039'] So are reps in individual terms like a thing now or what? [/quote] Looks like they will be in curb stomps. I do not expect to see that trend in closer or larger wars when the goal is to knock out enemy alliances as fast as possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCrotch Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 Good job NG, keep pounding the weeaboos for all they're worth. Surrender is for chumps anyway. This thread needs more tears, by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='dejarue' timestamp='1319405308' post='2831089'] I hope you guys get wiped out off the world. [/quote] Too bad we have certain alliances as higher priority! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Neo Uruk' timestamp='1319405810' post='2831095'] Too bad we have certain alliances as higher priority! [/quote] Which ones? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Xander the Only Posted October 23, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='dejarue' timestamp='1319405308' post='2831089'] I hope you guys get wiped out off the world. [/quote] Cute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1319405854' post='2831096'] Which ones? [/quote] Use your intuition to figure it out; the writing has been on the walls for months so to speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1319405854' post='2831096'] Which ones? [/quote] The ones that are going on the way out on their own? Or the ones we maybe have to force out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Chocolate Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1319404486' post='2831068'] I always thought that the purpose of individual terms was to encourage enemy nations to desert, and thus make the fight easier. What encouragement do you offer them with these terms? [/quote] Non Grata is 226 nations strong. SOS Brigade is 22 nations strong. Non Grata has NO motivation to give easy individual surrender terms whatsoever. Who cares if all 22 keep fighting forever. It's already a curb stomp and always has been. No way it can get any easier for Non Grata. So the only motivation here that I can see is to be able to tell anyone who has a problem with how long this curb stomp has been going on, "we offered surrender terms to people who want out." So, to me anyway, the question is are these terms a fair trade for peace to the SOS nations who originally were not involved for the reason for the curb stomp in the first place and just happen to be in SOS Brigade when Non Grata attacked them? Edited October 23, 2011 by White Chocolate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted October 23, 2011 Report Share Posted October 23, 2011 [quote name='Owned-You' timestamp='1319406343' post='2831101'] Use your intuition to figure it out; the writing has been on the walls for months so to speak. [/quote] I don't want to put words in other peoples mouths. [quote name='Neo Uruk' timestamp='1319406454' post='2831103'] The ones that are going on the way out on their own? Or the ones we maybe have to force out? [/quote] Why would alliances going out on their own be higher up on your priority? Doesn't make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.