The Ace of Aces Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 (edited) I only added some alliances that had more than 80 nations. I did not even add some alliances, that had more than 80 nations. But you can request you alliance to join the web by filling out this form Alliance name: Alliance abbreviation: list of MADPs,MDPs,and MDoAPs number of nations: nation strength: You can also request to add new treaties and remove treaties just tell me what two or more alliances. This was made to last a long time and be updated. Thanks for your time and God Bless. Look at a circle follow that line from that circle to another circle that a treaty.... [img]http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc383/somebody141/TreatyWeb.png?t=1318124820[/img] Edited October 9, 2011 by The Ace of Aces Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 the 3D one looks better, we have too many alliances to manage the 2D webs anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Boris Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1318125288' post='2821221'] the 3D one looks better, we have too many alliances to manage the 2D webs anymore. [/quote] It's not just the number of alliances, though. A lot of it is the raw number of treaties and blocs floating around. If we had the current number of alliances but most retained a much simpler treaty roster, it would be far easier to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merk Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Nice work Ace. I understand why you didn't want to include alliances with less than 80 members, but those alliances not on here really change things up quite a bit. Still though, you did more than I would have bothered to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew734 Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 ummmmmm yea, no unless im missing some of our own treaties, we are not allied to FOK or MK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted October 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 I went by cybernations wiki... So update that please... Ill edit it tomorrow Ill edit it once a day or so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmia Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 What..? I've already spotted some errors. IRON isn't MDoAPed to either FOK or MK. Also, number of members doesn't mean irrelevancy, that is going to leave out quite a few alliances that matter today and inherently flaw this treaty web. If someone can't find the chains to smaller alliances then they can't figure out the connections to the larger ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted October 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Like I said if you want your alliance request it to be added and I went off of wiki. Ill update it later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom Zak Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 ^Other people already said it. Not allied to FOK! or MK. I don't think TOP is allied to FOK! either. Also, our wiki is updated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facade Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 TIO is also MDoAP'ed to LOSS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 [quote name='The Ace of Aces' timestamp='1318125686' post='2821227'] I went by cybernations wiki... [/quote] That was your first mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted October 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Thats is also why I said that I want people to tell me where I messed up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seerow Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Wait CN Wiki says MK is treatied to IRON? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wishywashy Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Are there really two sides connected by only two treaties? Damn feel bad for that side on the right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigrun Vapneir Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Sorry, Bob's is much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ernesto Che Guevara Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1318129304' post='2821271'] Wait CN Wiki says MK is treatied to IRON? Really? [/quote] The treaty is so secret, even MK doesn't know it exists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Sorry to say, it is missing too many alliances to be really of use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 This is a good start. Although I like using the 3D web to see how things cluster in general, I feel that a well-designed 2D web can give the viewer a clearer picture. I might suggest that a 2D web makes the most sense when drawing out the two sides of a potential war. Then, viewers can visually ascertain how the two factions are tied to alliances within their respective factions and who might be called upon to fight a war for an alliance multiple chained separations away, but you could also see how the two factions could technically be tied to each other. So... what could be fun and interesting might be drawing 2D webs starting from a simple premise: Alliance A attacks Alliance B. Then draw all of alliance A and B's treaty partners and connect the lines. Then draw the treaties of the treaty partners, and so forth. Possibly the web will contain all of CN anyway, but it could be interesting to see a few of those... Maybe even Bob Janova's treaty compendium/3d web could have its program modified to also spit out 2D webs based on scenarios such as the one described above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beau Vine Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1318129304' post='2821271'] Wait CN Wiki says MK is treatied to IRON? Really? [/quote] No, not really Our wiki is up to date, last edit was on 1st October to reflect IA ministerial switch. Since your page is up to date as well, I don't know where that came from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted October 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 Sorry I know where that came from now... And I want more alliances added in the web that why I put that application on the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusty Juggler Posted October 9, 2011 Report Share Posted October 9, 2011 I don't remember ever adding FOK and MK to our wiki treaty list :3 Have you thought about coloring the lines differently for MDPs, MADPs, and MDoAPs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ace of Aces Posted October 10, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2011 Again sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 Sadly, we also have a MDoAP with VE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodger Waldie Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 (edited) hey wut about FOK / GO we love R&R also Edited October 12, 2011 by Rodger Waldie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMC123 Posted October 12, 2011 Report Share Posted October 12, 2011 Man, If this web was how the game really was divided and there weren't smaller alliances making other connections, all we'd need to do is have NSO and TPF cancel, and GOD and ARES cancel, and we'd have our next war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.