The Big Bad Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 I do not have any issues with this. Although why give them a chance to surrender at all? Live and die as one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micheal Malone Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 Fair terms. [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1317359683' post='2812452'] As far as you posting your nation link: If you're man enough for a 1 v 1. 7 day war, one round. My defensive slots protected so no others will mettle with our affair. Then, I'm your huckleberry. That's just my game. You up for it Ringo? [/quote] If Ringo ain't, look me up. Ask berbers, I'm fun for it. You just lemme know if you're down and we'll throw blows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 [quote name='Ashoka the Great' timestamp='1317427690' post='2813036'] Because I have no clue what it's about. And I don't really care, either. Enough people have told me it's a lie that I believe it to be a lie. Hell, notice that on that very same page you see Slayer defending Martens. If you knew anything at all, you would instantly suspect something was wrong with the accusation being made. I guess what I'm trying to say is.... [u]You weren't around[/u], f-tard, so I honestly have no idea how you believe you can possibly have one goddamn clue as to what you're talking about. For now, though, your desire to defend your ally four years after the fact with 'information' that is complete nonsense is noted. Thank you for making a complete ass of yourself. Again. Truly it is a skill. If you wish to continue to dredge up two or four year old arguments, go have a chat with Xiphosis. If you catch him when he hasn't taken his anti-paranoia medication he can really get a good froth going. The two of you can sit around and spin complete lies and then congratulate each other for being right. But in the meantime, bask in the superior morality of your pal, Xychosis: And now we're done. Take this argument elsewhere, stfu or go eat a knife. Whatever it takes for you to understand that this is neither the time nor the place to re-hash four-year-old events that, as I noted, [b]you know absolutely nothing about[/b]. [/quote] This is a pretty offensive rant even by your standards Zog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hecate Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 [b]Let's get back on track, folks, this thread isn't about GOD and NoR.[/b] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan King Posted October 1, 2011 Report Share Posted October 1, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1317426075' post='2813018'] Has anyone ever charged reps for individual surrender terms before? This war is just so ... full of [i]interesting[/i] precedents. [/quote] Well, people charge reps for a tech raid so it's not unheard of. As for reps for individual terms, I honestly have no idea. I know that I've never personally voted to authorize them in an alliance war. I'm just popping in to say that these surrender terms are reasonable and don't put any unreasonable restrictions on the surrendering nations. I especially appreciate the lack of wonder decommissionings. Edited October 1, 2011 by Duncan King Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.