mmansfield68 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 This is a press conference, and I have two (VERY IMPORTANT) questions for STA at this time: 1. STA, lay it on the line - cake or pie? 2. Tyga, as a fat cat, what is your favorite flavor of ice cream? Marked URGENT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 (edited) When a global war comes along, do you think if an alliance without treaties declares on someone to assist the smaller side, do you think they are a rogue? Also do you agree with the intent of the Moldavi Doctrine that anyone can come to the assistance of someone at war without a treaty and providing that assistance would be a valid CB, as a treaty isn't needed for optional defense? Edited September 16, 2011 by Methrage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Ah, Methrage....always seeking justification for his actions from any source possible. It wasn't found in the original threads, so might as well seek it elsewhere, eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 [quote name='mmansfield68' timestamp='1316139924' post='2801250'] This is a press conference, and I have two (VERY IMPORTANT) questions for STA at this time: 1. STA, lay it on the line - cake or pie? [/quote] Depends on what sort of pie or cake you are offering. [quote] 2. Tyga, as a fat cat, what is your favorite flavor of ice cream? [/quote] Cookies and cream. [quote name='Methrage']] When a global war comes along, do you think if an alliance without treaties declares on someone to assist the smaller side, do you think they are a rogue or an alliance doing something good sticking up for the outmatched side? Also do you agree with the intent of the Moldavi Doctrine that anyone can come to the assistance of someone at war without a treaty and providing that assistance would be a valid CB, as a treaty isn't needed for optional defense? [/quote] I'll ignore the first part of your post as I've been through this with you a number of times and will not indulge your nonsense again. As for the Moldavi Doctrine, I do agree that any alliance has the right to defend any alliance they wish regardless of treaties as I believe that optional defence is the standard agreement between all alliances without the need to put it in writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 (edited) That's it, you're off the Christmas card list. On a serious note, if you could draw a circle around you, NpO, ect. who would fill this de facto bloc? Often a friend of a friend is an ally, but sometimes they are not and you would prefer to exclude them. STA's thoughts? Edited September 16, 2011 by Kzoppistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted September 17, 2011 Report Share Posted September 17, 2011 [quote name='Kzoppistan' timestamp='1316213826' post='2801811'] On a serious note, if you could draw a circle around you, NpO, ect. who would fill this de facto bloc? Often a friend of a friend is an ally, but sometimes they are not and you would prefer to exclude them. STA's thoughts? [/quote] To be honest, I haven't looked at the treaty web in well over a year so have no idea who'd be in that circle or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.