Jump to content

WAPA/TLR Whisky Accords


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1309650469' post='2747202']
I see no no-chaining clause.

Isn't WAPA in a MDAP bloc?
[/quote]
Thus the comment on the terrible wording. This essentially means any action taken by TLR, AZTEC has to support, and AZTEC was not even told about the signing of this treaty beforehand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' timestamp='1309652147' post='2747216']
Thus the comment on the terrible wording. This essentially means any action taken by TLR, AZTEC has to support, and AZTEC was not even told about the signing of this treaty beforehand.
[/quote]

I knew about this many months ago. Congrats on the signing.

My recommendation is that you adopt the acronym TlR to avoid any confusion going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Penlugue Solaris' timestamp='1309652147' post='2747216']
Thus the comment on the terrible wording. This essentially means any action taken by TLR, AZTEC has to support, and AZTEC was not even told about the signing of this treaty beforehand.
[/quote]

If I were AZTEC, I'd be putting an immense amount of pressure on WAPA to either downgrade (they are a protectorate of Legion) or at the very least, add a no-chaining clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1309654674' post='2747243']
If I were AZTEC, I'd be putting an immense amount of pressure on WAPA to either downgrade (they are a protectorate of Legion) or at the very least, add a no-chaining clause.
[/quote]
AZTEC treaty text has provision to handle external chaining links. ^_^

Edited by shahenshah
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Lemax' timestamp='1309652956' post='2747223']
I knew about this many months ago. Congrats on the signing.

My recommendation is that you adopt the acronym TlR to avoid any confusion going forward.
[/quote]
I'm sure :P

And Jgoods, which?

Edited by Penlugue Solaris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't quite grasp a protectorate signing mutual defence treaties. If you're capable of fulfilling the obligations of an MDP level treaty, then surely you don't need a protectorate anymore. Your treaty with Legion should've been upgraded or cancelled before you commited to this treaty.

I mean, I think TLR are ok, but I find that bizarre and can't see a way for you to honor this treaty with your current commitment to Legion.

To my knowledge, no member of AZTEC has a treaty without a non-chaining clause, which enables us to properly discuss and make a unified decision on which direction we're defending during war time. At the very least, WAPA should probably look into correcting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mayzie' timestamp='1309778411' post='2748298']
I can't quite grasp a protectorate signing mutual defence treaties. [u]If you're capable of fulfilling the obligations of an MDP level treaty, then surely you don't need a protectorate anymore[/u]. Your treaty with Legion should've been upgraded or cancelled before you commited to this treaty.

I mean, I think TLR are ok, but I find that bizarre and can't see a way for you to honor this treaty with your current commitment to Legion.

[/quote]
don't you think we are correcting that very soon? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...