KainIIIC Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 Why oh why didn't you move on in WPE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pansy Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 [quote name='kulomascovia' timestamp='1303247562' post='2693906'] Why didn't you guys talk to AcTi instead of attacking them? [/quote] I have merely given them the facts that diplomatic channels are open if they wish to find an end to this. War is a part of CN just as much as talking, the war option was taken initially, does not mean we are not willing to talk about a peaceful resolution with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Rahl Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 [quote name='Teddyyo' timestamp='1303237482' post='2693747'] [b]To the group of nations which refer to themselves as 'Thriller':[/b] [/quote] I don't get it. Are you implying that Thriller doesn't actually exist? Or that they do not thrill, as has been claimed? Why the use of quotes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 [quote name='Richard Rahl' timestamp='1303249319' post='2693932'] I don't get it. Are you implying that Thriller doesn't actually exist? Or that they do not thrill, as has been claimed? Why the use of quotes? [/quote] His claim is that they are not a legitimate alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 How on earth do Bat/Ted come to be in charge of over 40 nations and nearly 2m NS? How does that even happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiderJerusalem Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 <Teddyyo> Fine, I wanted to leave my options open <Teddyyo> but if you're so damn insistent <Teddyyo> sure i'll go out of hippy I hope that you're true to your word... Unlike your boss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted April 19, 2011 Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 (edited) Talks with Teddyo were in #thriller a short while ago. Edited April 20, 2011 by wickedj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facade Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='kulomascovia' timestamp='1303247562' post='2693906'] Why didn't you guys talk to AcTi instead of attacking them? [/quote] I didn't attack them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred von Tirpitz Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 I dont know what people's grievances are with either Teddyo or Battalion but after reading two announcements of such caliber in two days from the both of you I rather wish your member-base would impeach you and then proceed to have you drawn and quartered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Trail Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Alfred von Tirpitz' timestamp='1303265266' post='2694176'] I dont know what people's grievances are with either Teddyo or Battalion but after reading two announcements of such caliber in two days from the both of you I rather wish your member-base would impeach you and then proceed to have you drawn and quartered. [/quote] Me either can somebody recap on what the hell happened? Edited April 20, 2011 by The Trail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Systemfailure Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303265493' post='2694180'] Me either can somebody recap on what the hell happened? [/quote] they are so fail if we didnt roll them their membership would have....oh wait not with those warchests they wouldnt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omniscient1 Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 Damn the models!!! Full speed ahead! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 Using the NPO guide to war are you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoindotnler Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='Teddyyo' timestamp='1303238996' post='2693781'] All justification I have heard regarding the attack has been levied against Batallion and myself. I have seen numerous statements from nations in 'Thriller' and others blaming the war on past grievances against us. The statement, 'This is a war targeted at AcTi and not targeted at its leadership', is false. [/quote] [center][img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4237780/svg/Ussrflagr.png[/img] [size="6"][b]An announcement from the Geconfedereerde Socialistische Staten van Rjvkmsc[/b][/size][/center] Greetings ladies and gentleman of planet Bob, it also has come to my attention that Thriller has declared war on AcTi. As a peace mode warrior I demand that the force of Thriller and AcTi stand down immediately and work to a peaceful coexistence with out grudges to each other. If you do not I will be forced to intervene probably by means of a pillow fight. [i]Signed,[/i] Xoindotnler, [i]ruler of Geconfedereerde Socialistische Staten van Rjvkmsc province of the kingdom of Avalon[/i] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin32891 Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) [quote name='The Corrupt Teacher' timestamp='1303246183' post='2693884'] Obligatory sinking model ship. I'd mess with it and put Acti on the side but ship propaganda is pretty lame so I didn't bother. [img]http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/cbolego/Yamato/50.jpg[/img] [/quote] [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4LyoUGxVd8"]Some music to go with that picture.[/url] Edited April 20, 2011 by kevin32891 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddjob Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='Jaymjaym' timestamp='1303237552' post='2693749'] This definitely needed a new topic. [/quote] Of course it did. More drama in the OWF = More drama in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Trail Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303270459' post='2694240'] they are so fail if we didnt roll them their membership would have....oh wait not with those warchests they wouldnt [/quote] So you have no cassus belli? classy. I had no idea cyber bullying is back. The last time that happened was 2007-2008 I think during the WuT era Edited April 20, 2011 by The Trail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Systemfailure Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303304978' post='2694568'] So you have no cassus belli? classy. I had no idea cyber bullying is back. The last time that happened was 2007-2008 I think during the WuT era [/quote] please stop your making me nostalgic , i didnt say we have No CB but frankly are you really going to make a big deal about that given the recent turn of events? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Trail Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) [quote]I didnt say we have No CB[/quote] I see [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303305241' post='2694571'] but frankly are you really going to make a big deal about that [/quote] Contradiction? If you didn't say it in the past you sure as hell just did then Given the recent events yes I am still going to make an issue out of it. If teddy or the other dude are at fault here you should have attacked them not the others in the alliance. Maybe it is too hard for you to grasp this but im sure there are people in that alliance that are in there that are innocent and just want to build their nations? Having no warchest or having no spies or having no forum to communicate with is not a valid CB to declare war on an alliance for. And if you have trouble with the leaders then you target them. Especially when this alliance as you have shown has no representation on any sort of forum (meaning the members have no idea whats going on) I am not sure what the recent turn of events are (just that you split of from your alliances and made an AA with the sole purpose of attacking an alliance you dont like) Edited April 20, 2011 by The Trail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Systemfailure Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303305566' post='2694575'] I see [/quote] cool [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303305566' post='2694575'] Contradiction? [/quote] Nope, we have a CB, but why make a big deal about it since there are plenty of wars already doing it and the agruemnets for and against have already been given i have nothing new to say on the subject. [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303305566' post='2694575']If you didn't say it in the past you sure as hell just did then[/quote]umm what? [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303305566' post='2694575'] Given the recent events yes I am still going to make an issue out of it. If teddy or the other dude are at fault here you should have attacked them not the others in the alliance. [/quote] We would have but they ran and left their "friends" to fend for themselves. [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303305566' post='2694575'] Maybe it is too hard for you to grasp this but im sure there are people in that alliance that are in there that are innocent and just want to build their nations? Having no warchest or having no spies or having no forum to communicate with is not a valid CB to declare war on an alliance for.[/quote]Nations are held accountable everyday for their leader actions..how is this different?, no forum no means to communicate..except for in game, IRC and its not our fault that dont have forums. [quote]And if you have trouble with the leaders then you target them. Especially when this alliance as you have shown has no representation on any sort of forum (meaning the members have no idea whats going on)[/quote]your repeating the last 2 points again but thats ok. [quote] I am not sure what the recent turn of events are (just that you split of from your alliances and made an AA with the sole purpose of attacking an alliance you dont like) [/quote]yeah im sorry i didnt clarify what i ment, i mean given that the past 2 major wars have been built on a fake CB(please dont bother telling me about whos right or wrong in the past PBvNpO war i dont care) or none at all (thumbs up MK and Doomhouse stay classy). oh and for the record my own personal reason for this war is 1. I can. 2. Why not. 3. I resent anyone failing more then me at any given time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Velox Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303306173' post='2694582'] cool Nope, we have a CB, but why make a big deal about it since there are plenty of wars already doing it and the agruemnets for and against have already been given i have nothing new to say on the subject. umm what? We would have but they ran and left their "friends" to fend for themselves. Nations are held accountable everyday for their leader actions..how is this different?, no forum no means to communicate..except for in game, IRC and its not our fault that dont have forums. your repeating the last 2 points again but thats ok. yeah im sorry i didnt clarify what i ment, i mean given that the past 2 major wars have been built on a fake CB(please dont bother telling me about whos right or wrong in the past PBvNpO war i dont care) or none at all (thumbs up MK and Doomhouse stay classy). oh and for the record my own personal reason for this war is 1. I can. 2. Why not. 3. I resent anyone failing more then me at any given time. [/quote] DH+PB had a CB. You do not have a cb and it's ridiculous that many of Thriller's members are the ones who formerly criticized DH+PB's wars as unwarranted aggression. "Hypocrisy kingdom" riiiiiiiiiighttt. Edited April 20, 2011 by Lord Velox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Trail Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='Systemfailure' timestamp='1303306173' post='2694582'] Nope, we have a CB, but why make a big deal about it since there are plenty of wars already doing it and the agruemnets for and against have already been given i have nothing new to say on the subject.[/quote] Still havent seen said CB (unless you refer to the NoCB is a CB now) [quote]umm what?[/quote] [quote]If you didn't say it in the past you sure as hell just did then[/quote] was a reference to your contradiction [quote]yeah im sorry i didnt clarify what i ment, i mean given that the past 2 major wars have been built on a fake CB(please dont bother telling me about whos right or wrong in the past PBvNpO war i dont care) or none at all (thumbs up MK and Doomhouse stay classy). oh and for the record my own personal reason for this war is 1. I can. 2. Why not. 3. I resent anyone failing more then me at any given time. [/quote] I dont really care who is right or wrong either. The PB-NpO war CB was solid. And even the DH-NPO war had a pointed out CB that basically implied that DH was pre-empting NPO to prevent them from interferring in the other war. The CB for this war I havent seen from either side or even a neutral party yet. Anyway good luck in your Raid fest hope you have fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burnsey Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='Teddyyo' timestamp='1303237482' post='2693747'] They will stop at nothing for the chance to attack and destroy Batallion and myself. [/quote] I think you're thinking too highly of yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Enema Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 Wut?? I was under the impression this was some sort of organized raid/troll/boredom relief sort of thing. Why would anyone need a CB to raid an alliance to relieve boredom? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Systemfailure Posted April 20, 2011 Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303306615' post='2694589'] Still havent seen said CB (unless you refer to the NoCB is a CB now)[/quote] its in our DoE 3 post i think [quote name='The Trail' timestamp='1303306615' post='2694589'] was a reference to your contradiction[/quote]i said i didnt mention No CB and then asked why IF i had it would matter given the current stance on CB's. [quote] I dont really care who is right or wrong either. The PB-NpO war CB was solid.[/quote] you dont care who was right or wrong but VE was right and NpO was wrong? [quote]And even the DH-NPO war had a pointed out CB that basically implied that DH was pre-empting NPO to prevent them from interferring in the other war.[/quote] a war thats over already but NPO remains at war because..oh thats right now it because they are a threat and must be destroyed(not that i have a problem with that) good thing DH packed that backup CB in case NpO peaced out [quote] The CB for this war I havent seen from either side or even a neutral party yet. Anyway good luck in your Raid fest hope you have fun [/quote] thanks although if this was a raid we wouldnt be using CM's or bombing runs, or even institute a first strike policy..wow its almost like this is a war and look theres peace terms and if you ask nicely theres even a cut off date for this war but that a Thrilling secret Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.