Jump to content

FOK Announcement


ArneS

Recommended Posts

[quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1301002740' post='2675062']
My objective is to reduce and conclude this war as quickly as possible. Such is in the interest of all, though foes refuse to recognize it. We will structure incentives and forces toward this end.

To not do so would be the greatest evil.
[/quote]
No one's buying your pseudo-moralist crap, mostly because your giggling prominent posters can't keep it together for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 404
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1300999836' post='2674998']
Let's go ahead and get this out of the way using mode as predictor and save time in the future, but beware, spoiler:

[spoiler] [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100123025319/cybernations/images/thumb/0/09/Flag_of_FOK.svg/360px-Flag_of_FOK.svg.png[/img]

FOK demands 30,000 tech in tribute from TSI [/spoiler]
[/quote]

In all fairness to FOK, I don't think they demand much (if any) reps for their wars.

Unlike us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1301002740' post='2675062']
My objective is to reduce and conclude this war as quickly as possible. Such is in the interest of all, though foes refuse to recognize it. We will structure incentives and forces toward this end.

To not do so would be the greatest evil.
[/quote]

Of course it is, you are so kind sir, sorry for thinking the worst of you...


[spoiler]Sometimes I wonder if you really believe in what you are saying, I hope not.[/spoiler]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1300999836' post='2674998']
Let's go ahead and get this out of the way using mode as predictor and save time in the future, but beware, spoiler:

[spoiler] [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100123025319/cybernations/images/thumb/0/09/Flag_of_FOK.svg/360px-Flag_of_FOK.svg.png[/img]

FOK demands 30,000 tech in tribute from TSI [/spoiler]
[/quote]

Actually, FOK hasn't demanded nor received any reps for over 2,5 years now, but don't let that get in the way of your little theory.



In actuality though, this is more about allies requesting our help and:


[quote name='Scorponok' timestamp='1300999845' post='2675000']
FOK sure does love war :P
[/quote]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='wickedj' timestamp='1301003049' post='2675072']
Shame, FOK, lost alot of respect for you this war
[/quote]
You're breaking my heart J. :(

Also, I believe the reps issue is something that can (and should) be discussed in a seperate thread, as it has little, if anything, to do with our DoW.
Please take it elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1301002740' post='2675062']
My objective is to reduce and conclude this war as quickly as possible. Such is in the interest of all, though foes refuse to recognize it. We will structure incentives and forces toward this end.

To not do so would be the greatest evil.
[/quote]
So adding more alliances to the war=reducing the war? Doomhouse's rationale gets better by the hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Timberland' timestamp='1301002465' post='2675051']
Heres for the poor assumption ?
[/quote]
I hardly see how one line of text means the NADC "has continued waffling with regards to peace and wasted our time on multiple occasions".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1301002893' post='2675068']
No one's buying your pseudo-moralist crap, mostly because your giggling prominent posters can't keep it together for you.
[/quote]

"The new test for seriousness is no longer based on alliance rank but giggling prominent posters" - Schattenman

Rich, Schatt. Real rich.

Edited by tamerlane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Kajdav' timestamp='1301003228' post='2675079']
I hardly see how one line of text means the NADC "has continued waffling with regards to peace and wasted our time on multiple occasions".
[/quote]

It's idiotic to talk about peace at all if you have no intentions of peacing. It's a waste of time to have a meeting just to say "haha guys we're staying in and we're winning."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1301003542' post='2675087']
I am giggling like mad right now

[/quote]

Don't do that! You'll undermine Ardus' pseudo-moralist crap!!!

What have you done?!

Edited by tamerlane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Antoine Roquentin' timestamp='1301003439' post='2675085']
It's idiotic to talk about peace at all if you have no intentions of peacing. It's a waste of time to have a meeting just to say "haha guys we're staying in and we're winning."
[/quote]It's idiotic to offer peace on multiple occasions, even when you know it's going to be rejected, only for the sake of being able to jack up terms and claim that your opponent continues to waffle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='tamerlane' timestamp='1301003679' post='2675093']
Don't do that! You'll undermine Ardus' pseudo-moralist crap!!!

What have you done?!
[/quote]

ardus is a big dummy why does he pretend that he's not afflicted with severe ADHD and is ten years old like literally all of doomhouse

I mean really, who are we fooling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Horatio Longworth' timestamp='1301003559' post='2675089']
Bandwagon much? :unsure:
[/quote]
It's not really a bandwagon when we're calling people in to help in desperation with our losing war. FOK did enter because we were losing this right?

Edited by neneko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Tromp' timestamp='1301003149' post='2675075']
You're breaking my heart J. :(

Also, I believe the reps issue is something that can (and should) be discussed in a seperate thread, as it has little, if anything, to do with our DoW.
Please take it elsewhere.
[/quote]


Part of the rationale being presented by those on your "side" for your entry is the unwillingness of the alliances you hit to accept terms that were already on the table for them.

So in this sense, the terms presented have a direct correlation to your DoW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Kajdav' timestamp='1301003750' post='2675096']
It's idiotic to offer peace on multiple occasions, even when you know it's going to be rejected, only for the sake of being able to jack up terms and claim that your opponent continues to waffle.
[/quote]

TOP has never approached NADC about surrender terms, I waited for your gov to come to us

Edited by Timberland
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...