Jump to content

muffasamini

Members
  • Posts

    295
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by muffasamini

  1. This game is very flexible. If you want to see it played differently, start a new alliance and play politics in a new way. I would love to see an alliance try and play a little differently.

     

    However, I would recommend you join an alliance (any alliance) to help learn how the mechanics work first. Half of this game is the internal logistics of coordinating an alliance.

  2. [quote name='JoshuaR' date='16 February 2010 - 12:50 AM' timestamp='1266303022' post='2185085']
    I like the responses asking how it could hurt GOD to take the reps anyway.

    Other than the possibility that alliances at war with GOD will now attack the NPO for war-aiding and thus force GOD and 14 others to now come directly to NPO's defense and if they cannot then they fail to fulfill their own surrender terms thus freeing Pacifica from its own obligations...
    [/quote]

    shh, your giving away the whole plan! Only one alliance didnt see through our plot and your about to ruin our chances!

    [quote name='Earogema' date='16 February 2010 - 12:52 AM' timestamp='1266303169' post='2185090']
    According to the wiki, Tromp is FOK's DMoFA and he said you hadn't spoken to them in this very thread.

    Though it is possible to chalk that up to communication error. I have no idea m'self.
    [/quote]

    Because whatever has happend just now in this thread is the only thing to have happened. I learned that in peek-a-boo. I'm sure once Tromp talks to the rest of his gov he'll see that we have indeed talked to them, its just a miscommunication.

  3. [quote name='WarriorConcept' date='16 February 2010 - 12:08 AM' timestamp='1266300511' post='2184959']
    Asking an alliance to hold its end of surrender terms it agreed to in order to get an edge in a war? You're somehow calling that a [i]bad[/i] thing?
    [/quote]

    No, were going to pay them their terms as due. I'd say its a "[i]bad[/i] thing" to try and justify their choice by saying they aren't the only ones who choose to (which isnt even true) or that its ok because the NPO is evil, instead of admitting why they did it, To be petty and piss off the NPO in any little way they could. Too bad they are the only ones with such odd priorities, It's obvious they were expecting others to join them.

  4. Wait wait..

    Xiphosis/GOD acts like an arrogant vindictive jerk, then says that its ok because the NPO committed <insert just absolutely horrible act> years ago?

    This is my shocked face:
    [IMG]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a325/MuffasaMini/Ca.jpg[/IMG]

    No matter what you try to say, the fact remains that you are the sole alliance to demand the NPO continue the minimum rep payments during war.

  5. [quote name='Gairyuki' date='06 February 2010 - 01:15 PM' timestamp='1265483749' post='2164896']
    I like this war. So much destruction, so many treaties broken.

    When we emerge from this cluster$%&@ (if we emerge from it), CN will be the closest it has ever been to garnering a clean slate. The playing field has been leveled.
    [/quote]
    Dont be fooled, thats what people said about Karma. The field is not bieng leveled, it never will be. Were simply in the process of replacing one set of prejudices and alignments for another.

  6. I, as I said before, dont believe for a moment that TPF is being hung out to dry by their allies, I believe their allies are making a viable war plan.

    Well, then I'm glad Athens was the first and only to volunteer the for the crushing, infra-destroying task of waiting around for an unexpected counterattack. Very dangerous.

  7. First your having 'wonderful' elections, then I'm loling, then your disbanding, then your just bieng couped, now your cancelling treaties. I just dont know what to think.

    I was hoping to be able to say something to the effect that you failed because you didn't join Red Dawn like a sensible alliance, but I cant, its not true. This is just your fault KDII. You were funny, now your gone. I for one wont be recognizing the UED remnants, just like I never recognized you as a competent alliance leader. Bye.

  8. In any orderly system, stability relies on the stratification of responsibility to guide, the rigidity to deflect doubt, and the cement of our common ideals. Though you may drape your governments in different facades, your systems, your governments, your charters, it is all the same. In order to quell anarchy, one must impose order. One must relinquish some rights in exchange for stability. Valhalla and any other alliance does it every day. Though you may argue that on this spectrum, between order and chaos, we go to far, it is amoral to demand the stability and structure we do. I say it is amoral to allow the doubt and chaos one must embrace to avoid it.

    Francoism is an eddie of strength and order in turbulent waters.

×
×
  • Create New...