Coloradia

"Well, here at last, dear friends, on the shores of Bob comes the end of our fellowship in Cybernations. Go in peace! I will not say: do not weep; for not all tears are an evil.” In two weeks I will have reached six years of STA membership. I can't think of anywhere else I'd rather have spent that time. Thank you to all Tigers past and present. We truly have been one of a kind. Za Sibir!

In the STA it's a twinkie eating contest, nobody has ever managed to come close to Tyga.

Good god. That you and Samus are all RON can usually muster to even attempt a defense of itself on the OWF is embarrassing. I understand why NG took you back now. Absolute pity that your alliance mates were saddled with the two of you as public voices.

Would require people with balls. Most of those left are just pixel huggers.

Depends if you consider IRON fitting NG's head up their rear while removing the knife from NG's back to be impressive on the part of IRON, or just sad on the part of NG.

1. Wait, so I rip on IRON for lacking the balls to fight a war in which they aren't guaranteed the win. Samus counters with Bipolar. Isn't the main TOP/IRON whining point about Bipolar that they thought they had it in the bag before the whole Bipolar part of Bipolar? So Samus' counter argument to me stating that IRON won't fight a losing war, is to bring up a war they would never have fought if they knew they might lose? And then IRON and the CoC in Karma, I think we all know how that went. 2. WarriorSoul has it covered. 3. Yes, I'm sure you battled long and hard for all 3.6 million casualties that you have. 4. I only lost about 20k tech, although I'm not sure anyone expects anything resembling reality from you in the first place nowadays. You see, I'd happily go to ZI/ZT fighting a good stand up fight burning all the NS I can off of scum like RON. You cannot abide the concept of losing pixels and you attribute your fear of losing pixels to others.

This is complete bollocks in the current era of SDI/MP saturation. You've got an advantage for the first week at best, beyond that you're not landing a daily nuke, you're the target of downdeclares and perma staggers by a competent enemy, you're navy-less meaning no battle support, and your enemy is picking targets meaning they not only are larger than you on a nation to nation basis, but they can target select and coordinate while you're left hoping to coordinate with up to a half dozen allied nations that can all have different activity times leading to you being SoL on coordinating. The only way to honestly believe what you have said is complete and utter intellectual incompetence. Having said that, you're Samus, you're in IRON, and you and your alliance are some of the biggest bootlicking pixel hugging cowards on Bob. You wouldn't know the first thing about being in a losing and massively outnumbered war as you'll backstab, scheme, and betray to avoid anyone mistaking you for having balls or honor.

You, NSO, and Nordreich were in that war till the end, TPF did more damage per nation in their half of the war than every other alliance on our side (bar GATO and STA) did in the entire war. !@#$%*ing about them peacing out is just revisionist history because the rest of our side was incompetent $%&@s or barely engaged even if they were "at war" for a longer period of time. Regardless of how long they fought for they dealt (9th) and took (6th) most damage per nation on our side. They dealt (4th) and took (3rd) most damage per war on our side, so they were engaged in the upper tiers heavily, they just didn't stick around for the flailing dicks 20k NS vs 20k NS crap as the war wound down. Do you really have substance to your argument or are you like the liberals of Coloradia who rely on emotional appeals because they don't have a leg to stand on factually?

He doesn't really have a leg to stand on in terms of substance, he has to revert to the childish "lol u n00b we won". I don't think he realizes how his inability to converse without snide attempts to brag drives home our argument that RON are cowards who will do anything to avoid losing pixels.

Yeah, so sad that we have honour and fidelity. What's really sad, and just as predictable, is your lack of both.

RON has been terrible for a long long time. Cowards, bandwagoners, pixel huggers, etc. They hate us because we call them out on it. We don't play the PC game, we just call things as they are. They do what they can to take a shot at us when possible and then talk big about being on the winning side of 10:1 or worse matchups. You can tell they're a little sensitive to the truth. Heck, letting IRON hit us on a 3?4? oA chain was the only way NpO's side could lock down RONs loyalty during Disorder. It's honestly a little embarrassing how much irrational hatred they focus on little old STA considering how high and mighty their egos are.

Nah, keep the same nations in. Infra from 0-> 20k is cheaper than 15k->20k 4x.

I can acknowledge your good intent amidst the naivety. Civility and respect is for the friends>tech>infra, death before dishonor types though, not whatever you choose to call those who inhabit the Oculus alliances.

This has me terribly sad as you and Yehom passed me in the last 2 days for that 4th spot :(

Don't scare me like that!

I was replying to Shepard who *gasp* wasn't around for either of those. Thank you for displaying the resounding idiocy common amongst your kind though. :wub: I can at most give you a D+ for the effort. :facepalm:

Defender's are favored, slightly, for the first week at best. You'll be out of nukes before the end of the first cycle and any decent group of opponents will have succeeded on 80%+ of their ground and air attacks, with naval support, with a modicum of cooperation. The freebie ground and air attacks alone from 2 foes over that first week can almost match whatever extra nukes you may manage to hit. The instant you pass the first war cycle the advantage is heavily in favor of the attackers, who can select their targets, down declare, always land a nuke, etc. Please continue to enthrall me with your expert assessment of CN warfare though.

I'll take as gospel the word of one whom has never fought a defensive war in their CN history, only participating in predetermined victories with enormous numerical advantages, never knowing what it is like to be staggered or actually run out of nukes. Not. I mean STA pulled a 1.06 damage ratio on the losing side while IRON only managed a .96 on the winning side when we fought last. Head to head stats from last time STA fought IRON. Total wars - 267 IRON Damage Dealt - 1,465,896 STA Damage Dealt - 1,625,653

Rebuying to 5k infra daily just to farm casualties a little more, managed 2.55 million so far. Number of Soldiers Lost: 4,892,764 Attacking + 7,729,533 Defending = 12,622,297 Casualties Casualty Rank: Ranked #56 of 7,232 Nations (Top.77%)

Isn't it kind of sad that they trot out fools to spout this line over and over? Everyone knows the truth and everyone also knows how this war will be going down. They should save themselves a shred of dignity and stop this pathetic spin.

Google Docs Spreadsheet for more in depth breakdown. All data from RI5 Link Copy/Pasted most over from the last wars spreadsheet so may have missed some formatting errors or missed some deletions, just shoot me a PM or post here if you find something.

Precedent being it gets played however the winning side wants to play it at the time. Might makes right and all.

Za Sibir! The Phoenix shall not burn alone.

Aye, I think Tyga missed that he's in FTW not ODN. There's a reason FTW never struck me as an alliance of worth.

Casualties > Moralism?