jaaku

Voted TOP. Obviously.

There hasn't been an interesting time since Karma. Most of us just don't care that much anymore, and are merely going through the motions because we don't feel like losing the communities we belong to.

god dammit. why is LF back in gov? Well, we're boned. Congrats to my fellow paradoxians elected. May you lead, and serve, us well.

Friends > infra this rule can also be applied when losing infra to meet new friends. We certainly found that out with the alliances we now call friends.

[quote name='Locke' timestamp='1295606767' post='2588972'] It's not their fault some people put them in a terrible position; they took that position and ran with it. [/quote] They took it, assumed it, twisted it on it's head, and are thoroughly enjoying it.

[quote name='nhojnosnom' timestamp='1295591189' post='2588635'] its an affectionate name Goons gave us back in the day. Anyways yay war and what not. [/quote] Affectionate is one way to put it. Not sure if it's the term I'd use. But I'll go with it. Also, o/ LoSS and whatnot. Go have fun guys.

[quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1292729165' post='2543623'] The only thing that could be less of a surprise is the NPO treaty you're coming out with soon. [/quote] Kindly keep our secrets off the OWF please

best I could give man. Wish I could have done more.

[quote]Really? Nice to know we were not friends. Glad TPF never went out of its way to lookout for you all... oh wait. Real classy LoSS.[/quote] With all due respect TBB, aside from Caesar, who else was in true contact on a gov to gov level with LOSS and TPF? Let alone a member to member level. Although I will agree, DR's post is a little...backhanded. [quote]Echelon = Jaaku was really the only tie to them. There wasn't much communication outside of him with them.[/quote] this is true. I <3 Echelon, but that treaty should have been reviewed way before it was. At least in an effort to boost relations. [quote]Valhalla = never should have happened. I think we had two guys that were friends with them and the rest of the gov either didn't care or didn't want them.[/quote] It was exactly two. And one of the people who set the treaty up on their end left. I think the logic of signing that treaty was "we're going to end up defending them anyways" [quote]Zenith = Never should have happened. Again it was one or two guys that were friends with them and the rest of gov didn't care. What got this passed was they had Duncan King. That was the only person anyone really knew.[/quote] Odd, I seem to remember the majority of gov wanting to keep that treaty. [quote]Aboooe: I don't know if the word stole is the right one. Maybe bribed with lots of cookies fits better. Jaaku always finds his way home, where ever that may be.[/quote] This is disturbingly true. Then again, I just can't resist the sexiness of CGB :awe: Ok, I'm done with the nostalgia, questions. Who's the current MoG? what alliances are you currently looking at extending relationships with? will you sell me tech? When will your economy on the boards be fixed? and will you ever break into a serious sanction competitor?

[quote name='kencojenko' date='08 March 2010 - 10:13 AM' timestamp='1268061500' post='2218004'] I haven't been drunk since i started doing a large amount of FA work. [/quote] I have yet to be sober when doing FA work. If I'm going to lose IQ points, I might as well go all the way.

[quote name='Lord Stark' date='02 March 2010 - 01:23 PM' timestamp='1267554483' post='2211497'] Couldn't vote because neither option is correct. The bottom line is that the reps are just asking for what has been lost by CnG et al. as a result of the aggressive actions by TOP. They are higher then reps in the past but more has also been lost in this war then wars in the past. We didn't declare this war we just want to be compensated for our loss as a result of the war of aggression launched by TOP. With the said I'll happily keep fighting. As TonytheTiger points out TOP has bigger war chests and more nations in the 10k infra + then CnG does. Since we have such a numbers advantage though we can continue to deplete TOPs money and infra by spreading it over more nations causing less loss for us. Continue fighting and reps wont go away, but your only advantage will. So quite frankly - Please keep fighting. What we have offered is fair and there is no 'extortion' because we only ask to have returned what we have lost thus far in this horrible war that didn't even need to happen in the first place. [/quote] Paying reps to what CnG lost? Sure, I could understand that argument. Paying reps to everyone else because they decided to join in on a beatdown? That's not something i could agree with. To allude to whoever posted that medical bill analogy. I'm pretty certain that TOP is willing to pay some cash to who they punched. But when the rest of their buddies at the bar decide to join in and want cash for their bloody knuckles, they can keep on walking.