Jump to content

WorldConqueror

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,937

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by WorldConqueror

  1. WorldConqueror
    You know how ridiculous you look when you post that stuff in OOC areas right.
  2. WorldConqueror
    And passivity here means either being a follower or being a footnote in history. Funny though that you applaud those 'passive' alliances on your side while 'follower' was your flavour of the month insult for those aligned with DBDC a while back.
  3. WorldConqueror
    gosh i hope polar wins this war otherwise that guy taking a dump in his power armour will look mighty silly!
  4. WorldConqueror
    It's pretty bad when Legion only enters against micros.
  5. WorldConqueror
    u go girl
  6. WorldConqueror
    Not really! but if that's the way they want to see it i hope every legion member cries irl
  7. WorldConqueror
    one of these is not like the others...
  8. WorldConqueror
    Shard and President Ron of SUN coordinated against me very well, so kudos to them.
  9. WorldConqueror
    There's better ways to make your point though. Scalpel rather than sledgehammer and all that. Anyway, send 'em down to my range NSO.
  10. WorldConqueror
    It is cool to see the data laid out like that, kudos Evil0ne.
  11. WorldConqueror
    Shall we go through all the occasions that GOONS has called in allies? At least the alliance we called in an ally on actually has more NS than us (and we've done more damage to each alliance fighting us than they've done to us, bar Invicta). Amazing that GOONS tolerates such a !@#$%* poster representing them. Enjoy sitting on the sidelines while half your allies roll the others.
  12. WorldConqueror
    Thanks for the help doods! Those Italian guys have been diverting our attention somewhat.
  13. WorldConqueror
    I doubt it, unless it was one of my facetious uncapitalized misspelled posts.
  14. WorldConqueror
    It was a short and jocular conversation. But no you're right, I did overstate my point a bit. Just found it funny that she was asking Rush to approach her in a query instead of responding with something of substance here.
  15. WorldConqueror
    Surely it is up to you to rehabilitate your own image, people really aren't likely to come to you seeking it.
  16. WorldConqueror
    I'm not talking about coalitions, I'm talking about specific alliances. Losing alliances on peripheral fronts are sometimes able to gain themselves an early peace. You are right in that there are sometimes certain conditions, I suppose what I meant by surrender was accept an arrangement with the victors whereupon peace is agreed. The acceptance of such arrangement by the losing alliance, whether it includes a simple withdrawal from the wider war or reps or whatever, still boils down to their cost/benefit analysis of fighting on or peacing out. E: By peripheral fronts I was thinking of the wars emanating from SUN.
  17. WorldConqueror
    I don't know where you're pulling that bolded line from so I can't speak to that, for my part I was referencing posts I thought you guys made near the start of the war. Not sure how any of this is making SW look like an idiot though. You may have fought 4 month long wars in the past, the timeframe of such things is usually dictated by your willingness to surrender I would have thought.
  18. WorldConqueror
    wow they surrendered and everything!
  19. WorldConqueror
    Nice to see the Gen[M]ay imagery again. Enjoy yourselves Umb, always fun to watch your performance in wartime.
  20. WorldConqueror
    SNX is more than welcome to surrender to the forces of SHUT UP. I know enough to know that any worthwhile alliance would defend its members from attacks from Polar and would likely call in allies if need be.
  21. WorldConqueror
    Not sure how time works in Mogarland but the war has been going for just over a month from my perspective. Admittedly the slow rate of expansion may mean that the war necessarily drags on longer than most, but the blame for that falls on both coalitions. All the talk of excessively long war comes from your side, with 4 month engagements (Invicta) and eternal war (Polar) being thrown around from the start.
  22. WorldConqueror
    o rite i forgot about u and zoskia messin with our brain pieces
  23. WorldConqueror
    Man it sucks being out of the loop.
  24. WorldConqueror
    I was being sarcastic. At the conclusion of this war where a large proportion of the world is arrayed against you, even if you are not forced to drop your DBDC tech policy explicitly through terms you will be unable to apply it to anyone bar neutrals without kicking off a new alliance war. So if you want to set the record for shortest time between surrenders for an alliance, go for it.
  25. WorldConqueror
    That's true, though treaties are always selectively activated in these situations. But I'm not going to go down the rabbit hole of how much you owe mutual allies and allies of allies in wartime. Enjoy the war.
×
×
  • Create New...