Jump to content

WorldConqueror

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,937

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by WorldConqueror

  1. WorldConqueror
    The reasons do not matter. You initiated that conflict. Which is to say you were on the offensive. There can be no debate on that point. As for the rest, you keep trying to move the goalposts but the ridiculousness of your initial statement is already clear to all. I also think you will find it was you who first alluded to the merits of long over wars as some kind of grand statement of NpO's moral superiority. And no one cares about NONE or Vox.
  2. WorldConqueror
    There has been nothing that states what NpO is being punished for nor whether it is indeed a 'punishment' rather than a culture clash or whatever else. Funny though that you now claim to be mere babes while just previously recalling your comrades affiliations with years dead organizations. You demanded an example of an offensive war, not any of these things you list. Ask the question you want answered.
  3. WorldConqueror
    Yes yes, behold Polaris, pure as the driven snow. The last one springs to mind. No wait, that was 'preemptive retroactive defense' right.
  4. WorldConqueror
    Hmmmm. You could also read Starfox's original posts on the matter. You're eternally behind, aren't you Tywin.
  5. WorldConqueror
    My point was that taking the simple number of wars without context and extrapolating from that that certain alliances are gunning for or have a grudge with NpO seems like a rather kneejerk response which is surprising given how long you've played. That or it's a propaganda ploy.
  6. WorldConqueror
    Pretty naive take on things from you Starfox.
  7. WorldConqueror
    Your flag question is quite a good one. The lower centre part reminds me of the wolf head on the BFF flag from the silhouette, and the top part seems to be some kind of shield or coat of arms. Maybe it was getting too busy so it was all coloured red and used as a centrepiece. Either something like that or it's Tweety Bird, that's the only thing I can think of with wings and a deformed enough head.
  8. WorldConqueror
    That in no way counts as leverage over him you fucking idiot.
  9. WorldConqueror
    Alliance consolidation is always good, good luck in your new home.
  10. WorldConqueror
    ` That too, it does get tiring hearing it every war. There's perhaps a few specific instances where PM barbs would be justified, this isn't one of them. MK never had a problem finding new and creative insults!
  11. WorldConqueror
    It does seem a bit disingenuous to criticize an alliances use of peace mode when you aren't keeping the ones they do bring out at war.
  12. WorldConqueror
    My point though was that you accepted a restriction on your freedom of action. I'm not having a go at your war performance or your reasons for entering or exiting, just addressing the argument I'm seeing pop up this war regarding winning and losing and formal surrender.
  13. WorldConqueror
    You'll definitely fit right back in with todays TPF then.
  14. WorldConqueror
    Well, Tom Brady was in original GOONS wasn't he?
  15. WorldConqueror
    Guys GOONS are obviously conserving their strength for the GOONS civil war with Neutral Shoving.
  16. WorldConqueror
    We know. I'm sure you often fantasize about waking up and being in CN.
  17. WorldConqueror
    You mean exactly like your previous post?
  18. WorldConqueror
    If you were not beaten, why did you agree to not reenter the war.
  19. WorldConqueror
    Your posts will win the war yet!
  20. WorldConqueror
    My point would be exactly what I stated. The original subject of this thread is more than pointless so I took the opportunity to present my position on Kashmir-GOONS, since it was already under discussion. I made no mention of your choices for worst alliance and whatever else you're going on about. As for the rest, you do that little buddy.
  21. WorldConqueror
    Most of us really have no problem with GOONS. I even think that that message from you, about allowing your guys to get their fill of being nuked before peacing, was the right course for you to take. But we did find it amusing that you got all pissy about information that is shared amongst our membership, and obviously we react when threatened. There's really very little cause for friction between us, but you can't seem to get over your embarrassment.
  22. WorldConqueror
    o no what a sick burn by the master poster
  23. WorldConqueror
    So how'd that 'swamp Kashmir to force them out early' work out for you Legion? All that NS and you still can't manage to do anything meaningful with it. As for SUN, I'm sure we'll be seeing you again.
  24. WorldConqueror
    Indeed it was, yet Polar members still crow about it. My point was that \m/ was at least told they would not be granted peace, Polar just made it up for themselves.
  25. WorldConqueror
    I agree, it's a misused term, I tacitly acknowledged that in my use of the qualifier 'here'. Any concession as a means to peace is a surrender of some degree. Whoever dubbed peace and no re-entry as white peace definitely knew what they were doing in terms of perception.
×
×
  • Create New...