Jump to content

Lord Bwalla III

Members
  • Posts

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lord Bwalla III

  1. I don't think so. At first I supported nukes, but when I changed my government position, my income skyrocketed so i doubt it. experiment with it as you can change your government position whenever you want.
  2. i can't imagine just spending real money just to make young nations strounger
  3. I don't see why anyone may not have at least 3 in color trades. Hell if all 5 trade slots are in color trades, then that's plus 10 dollars income, which i'll take anyday.
  4. ehhh...i kind of agree, but I don't really think it's that important at the moment. Every nation has access and no access to to certain resources within their country, so it's kind of realistic like that.
  5. unless instructed to do so by my alliance, never.
  6. It may be effective but it is NOT necessary. If nations don't really want to be involved in nuclear war, they should be able to choose so.
  7. yeah...no. don't like this idea at all. in real life, a nation doesn't have to "wait a while" to change their defcon level. They can implement it as soon as they would like.
  8. yeah. i believe it's the happiness you want to worry about the most. Although it doesn't really effect happiness that much either.
  9. i can tell you though, it's going to be a disappointment once the event ends.
  10. ehh. I don't like them too much. I receive about one per month and used to receive a lot. Even when they are good events I don't like them. because, once the month is up, all the benefits your nation receives goes away, which gives you a feeling of annoyance and disappointment
  11. ehhh, raids are only good for tech and land. Overall you may actually gain tech and land. However, when it comes to money profits, the amount of money you loot does not exceed how much money you lose from how wartime effects your nation.
  12. it's effiency because i have a 50% ratio, and i lost an environment point.
  13. http://www.mrfixitonline.com/cyber_nations...pcalculator.php
  14. red. all five trades. getting hard to find the ones i want though.
  15. I think tech requirements should go down and infra should go up. actually...it doesn't even have to be like that. i would just like a tech-infra ratio to pace myself off of.
  16. yeah but you can't destroy EVERYTHING. in the end the leader is always going to survive (unless CN adds an "assasination" feature). And the leader may or may not possess the knowledge of "technology". But on CN, whose the dictate that? for the most part...i don't like this change. infra was good enough. Once you're ZI'ed, technology doesn't really matter until you get aided.
  17. we'll get over it and get used to them.
  18. nation strength shown promotes competition. and competition is good.
  19. i just think the the tech requirements shouldn't have changed so drastically. other than that i'm okay with it.
  20. only change i didn't agree with was the aircraft change...but in the end i just said "whatever" i agree everything you said for the most part.
×
×
  • Create New...