Jump to content

Crowdog07

Members
  • Posts

    817
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Crowdog07

  • Birthday 04/11/1989

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Crowdog Damnation
  • Alliance Name
    Dumbhowce.
  • Resource 1
    Aluminum
  • Resource 2
    Furs

Recent Profile Visitors

841 profile views

Crowdog07's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1340771769' post='2997931'] Supporting MK by saying other people is taking things too seriously, is just ridiculously backwards. There may be no other alliance here that takes CN as seriously as MK. [/quote] I can give you the link to my casting session last night that shows me playing CN while playing starcraft and casting it. You seriously have no idea how hard I was focusing on CN.
  2. Thank you for not making it weird for me to declare war on you.
  3. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1328586201' post='2915880'] As Hal said: But given that (to my current knowledge) neither Kait nor Hoo intend to exist as soon as possible, it is, as I said, not really all that surprising that RoK took the easy road. Given their nordic volksgeist, it's not really that odd that they'd take her slots as opposed to letting MK have them. It's not that big of a leap, Blacky. We're talking about people that put their dead on boats and then set the boats on fire. [/quote] Hoo can delete whenever he wants. Literally nothing is stopping him. I don't see how they both want out asap when he has an open door. It's not as if he's a knight in shining armor for quitting a week or two before Kait.
  4. [quote name='King Wally' timestamp='1328505406' post='2915284'] I think your both at fault. I'm just pointing out that RoK could be trying to lay out spin if they wanted to (ie. Bob's verdict that Kait was a ghost was made for illegal OOC reasons against the RoK charter and as such she was never a ghost and that new RoK gov could be claiming to not reinstate her memebership but instead rule that Bob's original claim of non-member status was never legitimate to start with as a result Kait was always a member). I wouldn't like their spin any more then yours to be honest though. Valid Comparison? Well I honestly think both parties are at fault and have accepted in nations at war to be honest. Both MK and RoK should have cleared up a peace plan for this war before either AA declared the combatants to be full members in my opinion. [/quote] But we didn't accept a member at war. We had a member go to war. How many times do you need to hear that they were still in MK before you understand that? Would it require us to abandon the entire MK AA just to show you that MK exists beyond the in game screen?
  5. [quote name='Krack' timestamp='1328232643' post='2913495'] 72 hours since the first time I asked ... 24 hours since the second time I asked ... ... and not one single RoK member spoke up in defense of Bob or Joe (including the guy who appointed Bob in the first place). I think that speaks for itself; they are both alliance [s]puppets[/s] leaders without an alliance membership to lead. [/quote] None of this has been debated or relevant since the time you asked it. Move on man, like I did with your mom.
  6. [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1328084456' post='2912441'] Issues relating to the charter are a matter for RoK's membership to determine, and I don't see any RoK members other than Joe disputing the change of leadership. So that leaves the final issue, which is the very issue that RoK is willing to [i]discuss[/i] with (is that better Jacapo?) MK, if MK gives it the opportunity. Any ongoing "damage" to RoK relates to the [i]perception[/i] of instability resulting from this 33-page [i]discussion[/i] largely between parties external to RoK, and not by the new incarnation of RoK. [/quote] 2) -605,358 Strength Change - Ragnarok As I was leaving your mom's house the other day, because I was done with her, she told me I was reminding her about all of those guys in Rok who left. My point being all those people that left have voiced their dispute over the change, albeit they have gotten their point across better than you or myth or the other NPL guy.
  7. I'd bet if the govt. of Rok didn't consider Kait a member, we wouldn't say anything about her fighting back. A tech raid is a tech raid and would be treated as such. But when you accept Kait as part of Rok with support from the alliance, it becomes a sanctioned action to attack MK as a member of Rok. Whereas MK was only attacking someone not affiliated with an alliance. So really its pretty easy to understand the options are to either continue considering her a ghost at her own peril, or talk to our gov the necessary actions for us to grant her peace. It's odd that this took 15 pages to convey.
  8. [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1327900776' post='2910277'] Believe it. I've known, worked with, and called Bob a a friend for a long time, but his and Joe's actions along with MK's are beyond the pale. [/quote] What the $%&@ did we do? Joe you have my support.
  9. [quote name='NoFish' timestamp='1324011585' post='2879570'] I thought attacking the ally of your ally was generally frowned upon, these days. Or have I gone and missed something, here? [/quote] You mean attacking an ally of an ally of an ally? We aren't hitting MHA, just their allied ghosts. We all know 3 allies out is always an enemy.
  10. The government should subsidize the tears of our enemies. Really, you're getting nothing for them.
  11. Way too much to write for the intended purpose. But as a terrorist I don't care. I don't have feelings.
  12. [center][img]http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff195/CommisarGaunt/oldtimetoad.png[/img][/center] The Oldfag Society, while not particularly concerned with the manners of the Jihad, will too stand behind our friends in the Mushqueda. Legion have too long been allowed to attempt to prosper, wot wot. May the Legion find the consequences of religious intolerance, and may their coffins be comfortable pip pip. Duke Crowdog - Representative of the Oldfag Society
  13. [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1301292584' post='2678902'] [color="#0000FF"]Sort of the same for me, but I chose a few on the "other side," just to round things out. But honestly some of the worst are on our side, unfortunately. Not that the other side doesn't have terrible posters. Lord knows they do. I think that terrible posters just come out to shine more when they're on the losing side. When MK/VE/Co. are on the downside, I know their idiots will shine the brightest. But yeah, the competition is not really that biased. Everyone nominated and in the running pretty much deserves to be there. You've all earned it. Be not proud.[/color] [/quote] You are a GOONS member now. The terms "other side" and "our side" have switched. You so silly, RV.
×
×
  • Create New...