Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Crowdog07

  • Rank
    I had a joke but it was censored
  • Birthday 04/11/1989

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Crowdog Damnation
  • Alliance Name
  • Resource 1
  • Resource 2

Recent Profile Visitors

763 profile views
  1. [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1340771769' post='2997931'] Supporting MK by saying other people is taking things too seriously, is just ridiculously backwards. There may be no other alliance here that takes CN as seriously as MK. [/quote] I can give you the link to my casting session last night that shows me playing CN while playing starcraft and casting it. You seriously have no idea how hard I was focusing on CN.
  2. You speak most reverently of the GOONS alliance.
  3. I hope you watched the AZ/TX game. That was a crazy ending! Same with Duke/Michigan too but especially the last 30 seconds of AZ/TX
  4. [quote name='TonytheTiger' date='01 April 2010 - 02:26 AM' timestamp='1270106762' post='2243445'] I hope we reform the Initiative and crush you all over again. [/quote] 0 for 1 so far.
  5. [img]http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y281/Anomaline/LUEshianity/lueshianity3r.jpg[/img] Always wanted to be in the original.
  6. [quote name='Sal Paradise' date='07 March 2010 - 09:23 PM' timestamp='1268018914' post='2217555'] Sexism is no laughing matter. Starts off as an off-colour joke around the office, and next thing you know Mary gets passed over for emperor, SkyGreenChick can only become Grandmistress when someone quits, and the rest of the women of the Cyberverse toil away in middle management blinded from the glare of refracted light coming through the glass ceiling. Disgusting. [/quote] If it's not funny, why do you make me chuckle? Calm down brah. There's a difference between sexism and a chivalry joke.
  7. [quote name='Duke William I' date='06 March 2010 - 03:51 PM' timestamp='1267912547' post='2216282'] So TOP has the option of 1)having to pay reps to CnG for who knows how long (and as result only being able to regrown Infar not tech) 2) nuking CnG all that time and taking negligible damages(there is only so far you can beat down a nation before it stops mattering) Something tells me they will go for the nuking. [/quote] I currently have 69 infra left. Nuke away. You're spending minimum 500,000 on a nuke to take off the cheapest infra I'll get. We're in the same position of nukes not hurt
  8. I hate that NUTS is becoming the new meme. But these reps offered are even more retarded so... NUTS
  9. [quote name='TonytheTiger' date='02 March 2010 - 03:04 AM' timestamp='1267520966' post='2211118'] Why would an alliance that has been preparing to be on the wrong end of a curbstomp since the WUT started turning on itself pay record setting reps? The fact is that a month on, TOP is still giving as good as we are getting, still has over 1k nukes, and still has warchests which will last us for many months more. Why should TOP peace out when we are just that well suited to a long war? It's getting to the point where CnG is just wagging a war of tech extortion. A loosing war, I might add. As
  10. So what you're saying is that you should screw everybody and not get what you deserve because you want to be the best? Well !@#$, sorry ODN, you get no reps from this because MK has to be better prepared to fight against you.
  11. [size="7"]They didn't have to accept the reps if they felt they were so unjustified. [/size] Anyone and everyone complaining about harsh reps is an idiot because these weren't required to be accepted. These are likely (I say likely because I won't pretend to have been in the discussions) the result of negotiations and offers/counter-offers.
  12. [quote name='Instr' date='27 February 2010 - 12:27 AM' timestamp='1267252274' post='2206098'] DEATH TO MUSHROOM KINGDOM! VOTE INST FOR OMBUDSMAN 2010 MAR, ON THE CAMPAIGN PLATFORM OF DRIVING MK INTO THE GROUDN [/quote] :runthis: [img]http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/7146/take1.jpg[/img] It was fun fighting you Canik. I'm glad you finally took my advice.
  13. [quote name='x Tela x' date='25 February 2010 - 11:28 AM' timestamp='1267119105' post='2203174'] You're right. It used to be that way. That doesn't mean it always has to be that way, and what Ivan and NSO are doing here is a huge step in the right direction, a step that the Karma coalition had a chance to make, but failed to do so. I'm not saying that was the goal of Karma - just that they had the chance to make this change and they didn't. Look, I'm sorry about what happened to EoTRS, and the numerous alliances in the past that gave up under harsh restrictions and terms, but repeating past
  14. [quote name='x Tela x' date='25 February 2010 - 06:56 AM' timestamp='1267102788' post='2202943'] Lack of humiliation does not equate to a compliment. So, let me answer your question with another. Since when is the purpose of surrender terms to humiliate your opponent? [/quote] It's been that way for a while, it's just everyone is getting numbed to the idea of being an !@#$%^&. Most original surrender terms from a while back included something near disbandment.
  15. [quote name='x Tela x' date='25 February 2010 - 01:51 AM' timestamp='1267084484' post='2202842'] Even so, Fark's terms are absolutely ridiculous. They serve no point but to humiliate their opponent. [/quote] Since when is the purpose of surrender terms to compliment your opponent?
  • Create New...