Jump to content

Hunterman1043

Members
  • Posts

    804
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hunterman1043

  1. To the OP: Oh quit your bitching, it's not like you are getting PZI'd like in the olden days..... Fight your war, take it up your rear, and then recover after it's over. Take it like a man.

    Also one man alliances will never get you far.... After this conflict is concluded and all debts are paid, look to a real alliance.

  2. "Pseudo" is because you, and other associated "alliances" have revolving-door membership policies with one another.  I don't really recognize you as distinct entities.  Having a distinct banner is irrelevant.  You are part of the same entity.

     

    Lolok well I'm glad if gives you enjoyment to bust our balls over a well established policy. I'll say this for the millionth time, dual membership has been a thing for a long time and is not new as you should know. At the end of the day DBDC doesn't tell us jack about who or who not we can have our LAN parties with, we can do that on our own, don't insult our intelligence. Furthermore, I don't need to convince closed minded individuals of that truth to make that a truth. It's the god-honest truth; ask them. Are you convinced? :o :(  ;)

     

    Just FYI, we were here first, so technically DBDC is our satellite. lol

  3. Why not just treaty DBDC instead of one of their satellite pseudo-alliances?

     

    What exactly in your definition is a "satellite pseudo-alliance" anyway? lol Satellite...... I could certainly understand from a limited point of view, but pseudo? Come on man, that's just mean. lol. Our nukes are as legit as legit comes. Remember that. ;)

     

    ANYWAY

     

    o/ DT

    o/ NPO

     

    Glad this happened. At first, I'll admit I opposed this treaty but after a couple of months dealing with the new government, I have to say that they won me over. Here's to a long fruitful relationship...... And epic LAN parties! lol

     

    Also, shout out to anyone who can remember the game these cheats go to: laimlame lapostal lamaxout

  4. Yea I'm not a cheater and never have been. That's not my interest. I made my nation to where it's at through my own hard work and determination.

    But my point has been made that even legitimate players will get questioned because so many people have abused the system by lying.

    I'm not willing to take the risk of us getting deleted so I'm going to continue to tell her to stay out.

  5. Ever since the introduction to the new rule that supposedly allows for multiple players on the same IP as long as no interaction happens, it just seems that more and more people are getting deleted for, at least claiming, exercising that rule.

    My question would be in more along the lines of how this is getting determined on who is cheating and who is legitimate? I ask this because my sister, who also plays a lot of online games, is finally interested in CN. However, I have instructed her to NOT create an account for fear that my current almost 6-year nation will get deleted.

    Do we have to be on separate computers? Is the mod team investigating via individual MAC addresses per device or just the IP?

    Not that I want to be the guy to question the mods, it's just that I'm curious to see if those guys that were deleted were actually operating multis or if the new rule is just a ploy to cull members, and like I said, how it is determined.

×
×
  • Create New...