TehChron
-
Posts
5,851 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by TehChron
-
-
Ah, I see that your reading comprehension skills are lacking then.yep
Who said anything about being done?
Well you didnt say there were going to be anymore parts, so I guess I have something to look forward to tomorrow.
-
NSO not doing things for great Justice?That last sentence says more than anything. Schemes. Not justice. Lies, not the truth. There is no interest in such noble virtues as truth and justice between the pathetic alliances of the WCE.Unpossible.
Hate doesn't show up spontaneously, you know. But I guess you could try the "lol jealous :trollface:" response, as cliched as it would be.There is just hate, hate of us, which unites them. As they scramble over each other, fighting endlessly, seeking a CB, we only gain in strength, and laugh at their pathetic attempts.
Yes, because every single person in that channel appeared to be stupid regardless of how you framed those logs.Their hate strengthens us, and their apparent stupidity merely pushes more intelligent alliances more in our direction.Honestly, now you've gotten sloppy with this. What a letdown, considering I was expecting a grand finish from you.
-
Me too.I'm really looking forward to this.
The funny thing about having logs is that you literally dont have to leap to conclusions about what people meant, as you have their words right there.Love the sparta-bashing behind their back, and the assumption that we make enemies faster than we make friends.
I only said you guys would simply piss off more people.
Then again, if you stop doing the crap you've been doing to piss people off to begin with, thus denying people a justification for activating treaties, you'll only enable this WCE to win in the end. Without firing a shot, I may add.
-
TehChron and Schatt, together, they will make up a CB the world has never seen before, how could GOONS stand up to spin of such magnitude?
INDEED HOW CAN YOU?!
But sadly things were not to pan out as was intended.
-
\m/ fearing GOONS? nah, we may not be BFF's but we don't fear them, and they don't fear us.
OR SO THEY THOUGHT
STAY TUNED
Hehe.
Should never let your guard down.
-
With RV and myself present, the set is complete.
With my wingman we begin to turn that ragtag bunch of misfits into a hardened military machine capable of destroying GOONS utterly because of the obvious lack of any real opposition to our goals.
Right?
-
LOL. I love you Sardonic.
"01[19:23] <%TehChron> Im speaking realistically
[19:23] <@Cookavich[NpO]> cut it, then"
hehe
Im frankly shocked that that was the one and only time anyone ever found cause to tell me to shut it that entire conversation.
-
I couldn't tell if you were being ironic or not when you were commenting on my musings in that channel.
Ill just assume you were being sincere and your inability to twist it into some kind of an insult made you come across as slightly bitter.
But its nice to see the main character finally got on the stage.
-
I just finished reading over the logs in their entirety. The entire thing is in a bad light.
Hurr let's roll gons over nuffin durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Please <redacted> harder.
Thats not a "bad light", thats just folks griping about wanting to find the right way to take down a group they dont like.
So its pretty horrible for some people to not like another group of folks?
-
Then they obviously did not believe in what they were doing.
"I dislike these guys" isnt really much of a motivation to begin with, so you have a point there.
-
It's fun to troll people anonymously when you know who the other is.
Yeah, but then they don't know who's trolling them. I guess I just don't understand the appeal of trolling when they have no idea who the one beating them over the head is.
Meh.
-
Well, I'm not saying it'd guarantee success. I'm saying I'd respect alliance more if they went to war for the real reason they feel war is warranted rather than jumping through silly hoops to convince everyone else they have a legitimate reason to go to war. I'd rather lose a war standing for something than win one over nonsense.
Well, the folks involved in the planning had something of a healthy fear of the aftermath of them taking a stand and failing.
Respect is good and all, but it doesn't help you advance much politically when you're under the jackboot of those that you declared war against openly.
-
Well, it depends on how much they want to fight said alliance in comparison to their own sense of Stat-well-being.
It all comes down to self-interest, really.
-
Not necessarily. If you have a sufficient number of alliances in agreement with you over a threat or general disliking of an alliance then you can win a war based on no CB (in the Cybernations sense).
Bah-dum tsh.
I suppose most people want to come up with a CB in order to reach that sufficient number, since most folks simply arent interested in a massive, full scale war for the sake of someone else's grudge.
-
A forum for people to release fake logs and screenshots, troll each other ~anonymously~ and occasionally stumble across a half truth: http://s4.zetaboards.com/Worry_Free_CNTALK/index/
Why would you troll anonymously? Doesn't that defeat the point? Although I can see the appeal of the latter two, meh.
Thanks for the link.
God damn I can not type tonight.
-
So you shared the logs with *~some people~* who then put it on WFCN. Seeing as you were the sharer it does point to you leaking them in some capacity
Eh, I suppose I am culpable somewhat from that perspective.
Looks like I'll have to re-evaluate my circle of friends.
Wait, whats WFCN?
-
Were they found on paste-bin or something?
-
Your hard drive has a leak.
*sigh*
Clearly someone I shared them with was the leak? Im not going to point any fingers, but as I wasnt in the channel for the parts that are currently up on the blogs, its safe to say they had resources aside from myself.
-
I didnt leak the logs, but I did record them.
Huh.
And I wasn't there for the stuff that's up now.
-
LOL
Really? Where was this?
-
What if the situation would appear just as negative if the analysis wasn't present? I read the whole thing, sans comments, and it looks just as bad, if not worse, than what we see here.
Now thats spin right there, once again. It starts off...Well interestingly enough, but it gets significantly better in the latter portion of the conversation, when anything of relevance is discussed.
-
Point out the spin.
Opinionated analysis of any situation done in such a way as to portray the opposing "side" in a negative light is literally what spin is.
-
Get to the main characters intro already.
-
Doesn't matter what non-buyers think.
A turd is a turd, it may not matter what non-buyers think, but you know what you're selling when you try to convince some random idiot that the stench he smells is merely "authenticity".
How disingenuous of you.
Highlights from WCE: Part 11
in The Goon Experience
A blog by Sardonic in General
Posted
Go on. Im sure that with you can mine plenty of examples of my deceit and hypocrisy.