The Big Bad
-
Posts
3,931 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by The Big Bad
-
-
2 hours ago, brucemania said:
Lol ... maybe that is a problem you are having now ..... you had no direction to follow so you needed to go back in the past to bring back ..... oh never mind ..... they say if u keep doing the same things (like bringing in the past) over and over expe ring a different result but things,remain the same that is a,definition and insanity. Thinking ur britches are bigger than u think like always u will get burned agian. Good luck
I would rather do something than nothing. Sitting around and watching NPO rot away with no control of its own destiny is pathetic. You have had that carcass IRON rotting on your doorstep for a decade as you roll along while Doom runs the show. Does anybody even know who the Emperor of the NPO is? I assume you still have one? Who would have thought in the final days Pacifica would be a non-factor.
-
14 minutes ago, brucemania said:
We are over it... under it ... and laughing at the water wash the sponge has cast over the don't know who we freinds with persona of being in bi polar
I do not think you all are anything about anything. You just exist. You are just sort of a meat shield at this point while others do things. It is kind of sad, maybe you can get Ivan to take back over and breath some life back into you all. Because at this point you might as well be Clawa.
-
Now, Ivan is here as well? Planet Bob has become one big AARP gathering. Ivan go ahead and park your walker between Sponge and Tyga.
-
37 minutes ago, brucemania said:
Delusional bi Polar thinking I would say.
You all turn on all your allies anyway, this just makes it easier for you.
-
10 hours ago, jerdge said:
"Shantamantan" and "Grubby" are the two best names there, both the individuals and your silly way of calling them.
On a different note, I'm amazed that visible kindness somehow found a way into your aging heart... I'm shocked, actually. Can't we literally count on anything anymore, for heaven's sake?
You can count on me to ever be an arrogant, self-aggrandizing, not so bright troll. Also ES has always been this way in private, just more growly in public.
-
On 9/11/2022 at 8:21 PM, janax said:
I AM RAMIRUS REBORN
Oh man, that guy was something. He ruined the whole, I never met a member of Grams I did not like rule.
-
33 minutes ago, DavidMustaine said:
Oh I'm sure you of all people would know stupid.
You would be correct. Hello stupid.
-
4 minutes ago, janax said:
!@#$? We did?
I mean, it's not nearly as sexy as it was when I ran it. Way too many weebs and less dick jokes, but I didn't think it was as bad as disbandment.
Now I'm questioning everything. Is anything real? Did Oswald act alone? How many licks DOEs it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop?
I may need a few minutes.
You are in Gramlins not Argent. I think you are just getting old and confused like the rest of us.
-
35 minutes ago, Rebel Virginia said:
Zigur is at least a memorable and unique fool. This one will be easily forgotten about in a few days. Just like Argent.
Argent disbanded a long time ago. I think Jonny Reno just uses that tag for fun when posting stupid things and then claiming posting stupid things was a plan to get people say, hey that was stupid.
-
38 minutes ago, LittleRena said:
You know when you go fishing, and every fish is just biting? Great day.
o7
Yes saying something stupid tends to get responses. You can be the new Zigur.
-
2 hours ago, iamthey said:
Because all of us make our decisions to please or spite the fifteen people who post on this forum.
Not all, just the smart ones.
-
6 hours ago, LittleRena said:
Expected, but still cowardly.
It is clear you do not know what any of those words mean.
-
-
1 hour ago, monkbonk said:
Not at all true. I had been an active, participating member and gave more to the cause than I received. Reading comprehension not your strong suit?
Talk about reading comprehension. What is not true at all? What are babbling about? Please pay attention. Your stupidity here in public means any alliance that is active enough to see this nonsense is not going to take you. Go find some inactive alliance will be to lazy to look into your background before taking you. That or change your name and never admit this was you.
-
47 minutes ago, monkbonk said:
What train wreck of an alliance accepts your nonsense? Another I would like to avoid.
I think you it would be a safe bet to avoid any alliance that is active enough to read any of this.
-
8 hours ago, Lord Windmark said:
Firingline,
I give up. You really dont have a clue what your talking about. You lost me at The Legion being "firmly in NGs sphere". Have fun!
brgds,
LW.
You know he is not trolling he really is that confused and boring. He claims that this is not act.
-
51 minutes ago, firingline said:
Attacking alliance X to draw their partner into a war without directly attacking said partner is, like, Planet Bob 101. How can you not understand that?
Yeah so here on Planet Bob people learned long ago they could use treaties in ways so others could not manipulate them. Half the time people preempt others or attack other fronts where no treaties are in play while not activating others to avoid being where they do not want to be. Unless you think the leadership of CLAWS is too stupid to know this. Which may be the case, I do not know them. But, you really should not be publicly shaming them like this.
-
25 minutes ago, DavidMustaine said:
If you're going to debate with those two you might need these:
Those are for Marines I am retired Army.
-
16 minutes ago, firingline said:
No, you just don't like what I said.
That's not the same thing as it being idiotic or incoherent.
Over a decade later and you're still unable to understand the distinction. Some things never change.
No it is idiotic. You clearly have no idea how wars have been on Planet Bob for a decade. "FTW indirectly attacked CLAWS" has to be one the dumb things I have ever seen here.
-
40 minutes ago, firingline said:
Context matters. Let me break this down for you.
FTW indirectly attacked CLAWS (an RFI member) by attacking 3 treaty obligations of theirs with no CB. They knew it would drag them into a war and provide just enough cover for you to play stupid since they weren't directly attacked. Just three of their allies, with no CB.
You quickly jumped onto their side of the war, and told the rest of RFI to pound sand. You offer no assistance to RFI as they fight a war that was brought to them by the people you purport to 'defend'.
Supremacy clause or not, it's highly unusual to side against your bloc when it was your bloc that was among the primary groups targeted with no CB (the others being NPO and Doom).
"But they weren't directly attacked so..." just isn't a very compelling argument. Yes, your entry on the side of FTW is justified based on precedent - treaties have been gamed for a very long time, it's part of the strategy of a war. You can execute the defense portion of your treaty with FTW.
That changes nothing.
Big picture: you chose to side with the aggressors who targeted your bloc. And as I pointed out earlier, you could at least make some token effort to activate RFI and help in some way through article IV. But you've chosen not to. And that's no mistake.
With GATO essentially nonexistent and you clearly firmly in NG's sphere, it really makes one wonder why RFI even exists anymore.
What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may Admin have mercy on your soul.
-
6 hours ago, jerdge said:
Hey I thought you were pretty new here.
I had to check my calendar when I saw your posts.
What's next, a Walford appearance? Doitzel?(Too bad for the ones we know can't show up again though.)
I have always thought of myself as new as I missed the first Great War.
-
41 minutes ago, firingline said:
Actually, yes, it is. "But we have alliances that raid!" really has nothing to do with anything - that's simply not how logic works.
There were several oddities during a time where even dreaming of fighting Pacifica could get you rolled and there were curbstomps every couple months - people who would stay aligned until they finally had an opportunity to fight back, for instance. But it remains quite rare to join in on the side of the aggressors (with no CB) against your blocmates, of your own free will when there was never a gun to your head.
Silly noob.
You do not even know what is going on this war much less the past. What alliance do you think attacked its own bloc? We can do this in single syllable words if it helps you. You are the Charlie Kelly of Planet Bob.
-
12 minutes ago, Van Hoo X said:
Just ... HAD to bring up CDT, huh?
Sorry old buddy.
-
1 hour ago, Shimmer said:
Hello TBB.
Hey Tim long time no see. Good to see all kinds of old timers wake up for this war.
A Message of Love from Polaris
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
I do not think it would be hard at this point, join NPO, be active enough to post once a year. Neither is mandatory, You can take the job if you want it.