Dagrr

This is amusing. Mainly due to the reasons why we're still fighting this war that should have entered its final phase oh...2 weeks or so ago. Or was it 3? Whatever. Happy 3 month war anniversary.

[quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1303534105' post='2697451'] Listen all you NPO idiots stop wasting time in this thread and get back destroying VE and GOONS at my behest. [/quote] Aye aye my captain.

[quote name='HeroofTime55' timestamp='1303533719' post='2697438'] Someone who *really* hates you. I mean really, really, really loathes you. My guess is someone in MK cooked this up and posted it to one of those secret spy forums. MK has demonstrated a deep love of cooking up false intel, perhaps someone didn't realize it's a bad idea to do so on behalf of the other team? [/quote] Look at the bright side. We all get to read another thread about the NPO. Don't even have to change the subject this time.

Well this is interesting. Who in DoomHouse wrote this fine piece?

If the Titans draft Mallet, I'm done. I think we can get Ponder in the 2nd round. Maybe Devlin later.

I'm going to steal a line from Dajobo... Your efforts could be spent in better places besides ODN Schatt. I will await VE declaring war on me.

I'll be back tomorrow then.

Not really sure what the need for this is. We already have a war going on, just join one side or the other if you are bored. Yes, Battallion is a boob but so is most everyone here. And yes, more people would care if acti was better connected.

>GPA

"Serving 1 to 30 of 71 Nuke Success Records" I think I've dropped 46 successfully in the past two months. Prior to that maybe 25 or so between 2/25 and the start of war. 12 offensive wars, 4 defensive. Lost track of nukes dropped/taken in my nations history. If I had to guess, it would be around 150-175 or so.

[quote name='NorthernLights' timestamp='1303095991' post='2692274'] I'm already in love with this thread. [/quote] As am I, though I suspect for different reasons. So is CnG AFK this weekend or what?

[quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303094920' post='2692232'] Have you seen the amount of nations we have below 40k compared to Legion? [/quote] You are aware that all of CnG is already at war with Legion surely? Not enough nations for you?

Well, this is amusing.

Actually this whole down and up thing helped with my attacks tonight. Thanks admin!

Poor MK.

Well, at least you can always use it as part of a CB later.

Anytime love.

Some of you people are taking this !@#$ way too seriously. [img]http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o102/soontir/datsdi2.png[/img] My contribution, over 9000 hours in MSPaint.

Congrats TOOL. There is always another day.

Fine you !@#$%^&. edit: now in millions of NS

Yeah, the type of google doc graph I was using didn't allow me to label the axis. I changed it to a new one, but I still kinda of prefer the old. The ten of thousands thing is a little awkward, but google docs wasn't letting me set a minimum value for the y axis. Doing it by the actual raw NS wouldn't fit on one screen correctly. But millions of NS...cmon. Maybe thousands. Ten of thousands is a nice compromise I think.

https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AprwA4GlvgCxdDdfRFhKUzU4RjFTZDZLLXhzSnpmZEE&hl=en&authkey=COma5s4F Added table of all alliances engaged, their starting NS on their day of declaration, current NS, and the percentage lost. A couple of the smaller alliances I couldn't get stats for because they weren't big enough for UE to track. There is an error with the NPO's side's NS, because I used the 1/24 numbers instead of the actual date they DoW'd. I'll fix it later. I've been thinking about adding all the alliances on the entire front to the graph, but it won't be for every single day of the war. Just the starting NS and the current NS. I'll probably do it next week. Until then hurr durr Pacifican propaganda graphs.

Congrats RIA

And Legion is actually added on there later, when they started fighting MK around mid March.

Please stop trying to start an argument because of my AA. I explained exactly why I organized things this way. The graph is centered on alliances engaged with NPO most directly. The revisionism and !@#$%*ing I'm referring to is over topics not relating to these stats. If I tracked GOONS, I would have to track all the alliances heavily engaged with them. If I added Umbrella, I would have to add Molon Labe. If I added NADC, I would have to add FOK and VE, etc. It's not designed to "prove" anything. It just means less work for me. If you want to track all of them, feel free. If I wanted to engage in real revisionism, I would have just put GOONS and Umbrella on there and left the alliances attacking them off.