Kristospherein

I came crawling out of the netherworld to support WAR with Umbrella. This will be fun. o/

Good point. I instead meant to say they think they're special rather than they say they are special. There is obviously a distinction.

What is it about Karma alliance members and their perception the NPO is throwing away "goodwill" daily by "speaking of eternal war" and of saying how outrageous and ironic the reps we have been offered are? Also, I do personally believe we think of ourselves as being more special than we should. However, I can say the same for several Karma alliances. Saying that we are "no longer special" after a nearly 200 page thread was maintained regarding our desire to not accept the reps Karma offered us is a bit asinine. Your mere participation in a thread solely about our future seals this fate at the present. The Karma coalition and Irony, oh how they love each other so. Edit: Grammar

Yes. Yes they are the bad guys when they offer reps like the ones they offered. Before that, they were definitely not "bad guys."

That would make for great PR.

It can be both. I just feel the desire for revenge here is so great it smothers any other emotions that might be lying around.

I disagree. The focus of the majority of this thread has been on making us pay for our past transgressions not on a concern about how we'll storm back from the dead and take everyone out. Yes, there have been a few comments here and there about it, but I feel the reps are more about revenge than they are about any concern of us coming back and hunting Karma down.

How about you read the OP. Yes we increased a certain part of the overall terms. However, we asked certain parts (the worst parts) to be removed in doing so. Therefore, the ultimate goal was to decrease the terms in one section but increase them in another. The resulting set of reps would have been lesser than the current ones offered. Also, just because you have been posting on the CN forums, as you state it, "forever," doesn't mean it has been intelligent posting.

I already did. i stated the one sentence summary was one-sided. This thread is two-sided, to say the least.

You guys always threaten the increase in the amount of the terms from where they are now. if we didn't accept them in their current form, what on God's green earth would cause us to accept reps that are worse? This reeks of idiocy.

I've read the majority of them and I think it is ludicrous to think you can sum up 200 pages of information into a single sentence.

Oh it will happen.

How exactly could you sum up 200 pages of opinions from 2 mainly divergent sources into a single sentence that comments only on one side of the argument? I tend to disagree.

I can say the same for the karma camp. Thanks for all of the idiocy.

nor you.

See you guys are just proving my point. Thanks.

I can tell just by the reps shown in the OP of this thread and all of the circular reasoning you guys are throwing around trying to keep us amused.

You were a special situation. We really really like you.

I didn't vote for a single one cause they're all just terrific people.

How about you go back, oh about 162 pages, and read the OP. This is already covered. Moo stated that term was never enforced and apologized for it.

You are obviously referring to both sides of this useless argument.

And that's assuming we would ever accept any such "draconian" terms.

Please humor me.

To you perhaps.

Much more as in what exactly?