Jump to content

Starfox101

Members
  • Posts

    6,789
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Starfox101

  1. he said your cybernation is too small
  2. Growing out of this post: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/126434-the-big-boss/?p=3378153 I will now assign you a WWF wrestler that suits the way you act in CN if you request it. Starting it off, Tywin Lannister is Eugene. At the end, Franz is going to write up an RP of wrestlemania 1 (aka GW1) using CNers. He doesn't have a choice in this. Myself, rey, and franz will be your official assigners.
  3. Gotta throw "and friends" in there lmao.
  4. Starfox101

    The 'C' word

    Good luck brother, I know you'll be alright in no time.
  5. Finally, someone acknowledges the most important number. :awesome:
  6. I dominate the Merrian(?)-Webster, you're saying?
  7. If you really thought you were getting away with that one, you're horribly optimistic. ;) Anyway, you guys used the term "brunt", not me. I actually think Sparta is a good alliance at warring. Do I, however, think you were the backbone of our coalition's war efforts? No.
  8. How dare you beat me to it... Brunt? Polar lost over 10 million NS last war...and has topped the charts along with NPO in total wars the last two times we rolled out. Did you guys fight a different war than the rest of us? Taking the brunt of the damage and dominating the entire mid-tier.
  9. I'm not even sure I was around at that time, honestly. I'd love to hear you elaborate on that one. Who exactly do you plan on fighting? GPA? There aren't many non-allied nations up there my friend.
  10. I think at the time, both sides even admitted it was done solely for realpolitik reasons. Sparta has actually sewn quite a bit of animosity with their former allies, even threatening to roll us at one point. They've also tried to sell us on a long-running friendship with DBDC. Besides, that move created a new super-coalition and some new drama. This just adds another weapon to DBDC's arsenal and will aid stagnation. A healthy opposition is always good. Aren't you aware, IRON is infallible? Back on topic: I really want to hear Alexandros o Megas and Justin666's opinion on this one.
  11. Honestly after the past 2 wars, I think there are quite a few to see Sparta gone. However, doesn't change the fact that it is a bit ridiculous to have an ally turn around and ally the people who attacked you a few months prior. Enjoy Sparta.
  12. Sparta's government has been attacking WTF for weeks now.
  13. Now, we have to decide just who exactly is Val Venis?
  14. To be of any assistance to DBDC, you'd need an upper tier, Sparta. Unfortunately, you lost your entire upper tier in repeated unprovoked attacks courtesy of DBDC over the last year. So...
  15. You had me laughing out loud with this wrestling RP. Please make every post in this manner. Also, a return of Vox has never been off the table. You just need the right people, as it would not work otherwise.
  16. That's not best for business. Stephanie McMahon (mods) and Triple H (admin) are not going to stand for Shawn Michaels (Bloodpack) putting his boss McMahon (DBDC) through a table, and for stealing the belt from the clutches of Cena (WTF). As a result you will now find yourselves in a HELL...IN A....CELL MATCH against BROCK LESNAR (NPO), SETH ROLLINS (Umbrella), DANIEL BRYAN (IRON) and a SURPRISE ENTRANT, KURT ANGLE (Vox Populi) WHO IS MAKING HIS RETURN TO WWE (CN) to rid WWE (CN) of heel Shawn Michaels (Bloodpack). I AM HERE FOR YOUR BODY
  17. Sign agreements to guarantee safety? That would do what, exactly? Every neutral alliance in the game has been hit by someone. Every protected alliance above a certain NS level has been dragged into something at a certain point. They didn't need agreements in the past because it was a gentleman's agreement that we would not hit them and they would mind their own business. If I've been involved in any curbstomps that could be at all compared to attacking a neutral alliance with a bunch of mercenaries, please let me know. The last time a neutral alliance was attacked, I was put to PZI for a year by the NPO for getting involved. Seems to be the opposite of a curbstomp, though. Lethargy is a bit too dominant from everyone, though. Oh, and you are on a mission to rid the game of inactive nations? You seem to be awfully selective and ineffective in that role. You're ignoring entire webs of nations and only target nations who don't seem to have MP's. If you really feel you are on a heroic mission to save CN from itself, you might want to do a better job. Maybe you should attack me because I could be considered inactive in alliance affairs. You are just not doing a very good job at putting forth an effective argument to support your actions, and you may want to abandon your talking points, and just admit you're a follower trying to win some favor in the mold of Sparta. To put it into something you'd understand, Bloodpack is like the 3rd man in a 3 man handicap match setup by Vince McMahon (DBDC) on poor John Cena (WTF), who just refuses to put any of you over. Stop being a heel Shawn Michaels. ;)
  18. Unfortunately for your little fantasy, it's already been stated that DS/DK will defend anyone who hits Bloodpack by DS government. In addition, if a rival brigade was formed, there would be far more nations pouring to your side and it would be a massive waste of time and pixels from everyone involved. There's also the issue that anyone not allied to the web of stagnation just took a massive beating. That's just what happens when a dominant web of alliances that are currently in power join together to form a mercenary brigade. Plus, you have vaunted alliances like Sparta on your side. Some of us just simply couldn't fathom fighting a resolute power like Sparta. You can sit here and act like you'd welcome any 1v1 challenge when in reality you already defeated your own argument when you stated that you waited for numbers before making your move. You are actually attempting to argue this raid is good for WTF. I'm sure their upper tier nations enjoyed losing 30k tech and having numerous friends delete. Some people just don't want to play the political game, and some just like to build. I don't know why you can't understand that. Like I said before, I can respect DBDC for moving on an alliance that to an extent was quite formidable in their tier. I have no respect for those who join along and attempt to earn some sort of goodwill from DBDC, or are attempting to just kick someone while they are down. It takes no skill to team up with a ton of other nations and attack a neutral alliance. The people you are currently fighting aren't even fighting back. I'm not sure where the glory is in beating a few inactive nations into deletion.
  19. Honestly just drop the tough act. If you were actually as tough as you'd like to pretend you'd have made the move on WTF before they were hit by DBDC and their clingers. It's just embarrassing to see you act like you are a hero. Limited? Not quite. They've organized a front of allied nations to launch illegitimate attacks because WTF won't cave. They've sanctioned WTF nations. The only reason nobody else has been called in yet is because nobody wants to melt their mid-tier on a neutral and the important alliances wouldn't go along with it. It's just simple politics. Killing the upper tier accomplished their mission, and there is no reason to call in backup. So, I'm not ready to give them credit for a "limited" engagement. Fight for what you believe in? Which is what, exactly? I'd love to see you break this one down. Bloodpack is a protected alliance, and anyone attacking them has already been threatened by DS (DK?), and they are connected to quite a few alliances. It's quite clear anyone forming a similar brigade would face a massive repercussion. Otherwise, it would have happened. Fair enough, NPO and MK were equally bad. DBDC absorbed some of the negative elements from MK, and I won't even discuss the fact that they've gotten away with so much in-game. Although, that particular issue is not solely limited to DBDC by any means, and they may well not be the biggest abuser. Back in the day alot of this stuff would have been handled differently, but at this point the people who run the game and the people who play the game are so lethargic it doesn't even matter. Edit: Just want to laugh at the post above me. Spare us the moralist bs when you were attacking WTF nations right alongside DBDC. At least they admit to it. Nothing is worse than a snake that thinks they are a lion.
  20. DBDC isn't really a problem to 75% of alliances in the game. The problem is the other alliances that are so quick to jump to their defense in the hopes their top tier's are never raided. There has never been a group that has gotten away with as much stuff, IC and OOC, as DBDC. So, the amount of support they have is kind of surprising. At this point it honestly doesn't matter though. The entire top tier has allied eachother except for GPA and those random others with 1-2 nations up there. The real politics will once again be focused around the mid-tier, which is currently dominated by Pacifica and IRON, the most powerful grouping in CN at the moment. The fact that you are out of the top tier will actually allow you to go back to doing what you did before, WTF. Nobody will waste their mid tier grinding a neutral down, so it's a pretty safe position compared to before.
  21. Backstab the mall? I knew NPO were monsters, but please don't destroy Hollister and Vans Store
  22. I hope this wasn't your big move, Hershey.
  23. This makes about 3 treaties between each alliance. Anyway, congrats for the stagnation this will surely bring.
  24. I have to say, you are making all the right moves, Pacifica. Forget about DBDC, I need to focus on this new hegemony. :p Congrats, guys.
×
×
  • Create New...